rotheram labour rape gang councilor holds diversity nhs role

What like Anne cryer? Or the women who spilled the beans on the rochdale gang  Who now a labour coucilor In rochdale

Wikipedia and Fullfact and various other sources state Starmer was appointed DPP and head of the CPS in 2008 and held that post until 2013, whereupon he departed to begin a career as a politician gaining a seat in 2015

One of his first dodgy cases was of course Ian Tomlinson and one has to ask how the dodgiest of forensic scientists with a clear directive never to be allowed to work alone on post mittens again after his previous clusterfuck was allowed, indeed specially called in, to destroy the crucial evidence in that PM

The allegations of child abusers enjoying themselves in Rochdale coincided with Starmers appointment and under his watch the allegations were ignored and the abuse allowed to continue for another two years until a new appointment in the local area l d to the resurrection of the abandoned investigation in 2011. So that’s three years under Starmers watch when fuck all was done and indeed allegations were ignored and victims considered unreliable witnesses (source Manchester Evening News)

In OXFORD systematic sexual abuse from 1998 to 2012 were investigated in 2011 leading to ten arrests and subsequent investigations in 2015 convicted twelve more. Reports in 2015 showed around 300 girls were probably abused while the police force ignored their complaints.

Again, Starmer was in post for 3 years before anything started to be done and nothing as fine under a Labour administration.

(Source Wikipedia)

The Rotherham abuses started in the late 1980s and continued right up to Starmers departure in 2013.

(Source Wikipedia and Andrew Norfolk)

I know Starmer boasts of prosecuting rapists but he seems to have done rather less than what he boasts of doing while collecting a tidy sum as DPP

No it's a fact.  Your buddies got their arses sued for misaccusing Naz Shah and she won winning substantial damages.  As TTL's link proves

here have another link that proves same:  news.sky.com/story/leave-eu-apologises-to-labour-mp-naz-shah-for-calling-her-grooming-gang-apologist-12086617 

Up to Tinculin if he wants to run similar risk.  And remember it's not his rule per se, it's this site's host's rule.  www.proboards.com/community-guidelines 




  

I presume you mean Naz Shah and her famous twatterings or actually re-twatterings of something posted by an Owen jones spoofer

You need to remember that the left must be forgiven for their errors and foibles. Oh and their suggestion acid is better than milkshake

Only the right can be crucified for statements made 40 years ago

How uninformed of the way it works are you allowed to be ?

Absolutely sure John, it still works here but Sky links do have trouble with some cookies. Here have the Beeb link www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-54373013

Anyone with any honesty and sense would see that she saw the original tweet as sarcastic and 'liked it' and as soon as it was explained to her she removed that like. This whole story and line of thread just shows how desperate some people are to find anything no matter how false they can throw at those politicians they disagree with.

Do you need a list of people convicted of no crime but either removed from their posts, being forced to resign or not been taken on in the first place due  to some small social infraction sometimes just belonging to a legal political party or like Ron Atkinson speaking out of turn, or Frank Ellis for agreeing with the Bell Curve, Kathleen Stock for holding views at odds with 'transgender rights'. There are many more.