|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 22, 2022 12:15:29 GMT
Yes, Steve but you keep wittering on about a large number of tablets... The article clearly refers to a large number of tablets going missing and stealing 'only on prescription' drugs bypassing prescription procedures is a serious issue. When the court clearly accepted that she was not responsible for those thefts. Except they didn't and you just made that up. Seems you still have difficulty reading that article, Specsavers do home visits now you know
' The magistrates granted her a 12-month conditional discharge, meaning she will not face prison unless she commits further offence within a year. She was also ordered her to pay £144 in costs and victim surcharge.' |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Dec 22, 2022 12:18:37 GMT
No I'm just not thick so always read articles before I start threads based only on reaction to click bait DM headlines. I don't. I have learnt anything from the Daily Mail is just not worth the effort. I used to be on a forum frequented by a few cultists trying to disseminate brainwashing material. The stock reply was, well you can't criticise unless you have read all his books. The thing is with the Daily Mail is it has already made its money as soon as you click the link. The DM & DE are guilty of misleading headline grabbers, once you start reading them they have different connotations to the headlines.
I tend to go straight to the 'people's comments', you get more sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 22, 2022 12:20:43 GMT
BS ^ Seems you didn't read this in the article 'Morgan pleaded guilty to two offences of theft by employee.'So only an idiot would believe she could then be acquitted I don't give a flying fuck if she stole a couple of headache tablets or not.
Working in the NHS and having to deal with the shit they deal with I'd need headache tablets, it's the perk of the job.
I don't care if she pleaded guilty or not, it is NOT a dismissal offence.
I thought it was 'tablets' as in ipads, well of course that would have been a different theft.
FFS how many times will I have to repeat this before it sinks in.
I DO NOT CARE IF SHE STOLE A COUPLE OF HEADACHE TABLETS.... GOOD ON HER.
Well she's free to take her case to an employment tribunal. Don't hold your breath waiting for that. The conviction has to be based on either a guilty plea (as in this case) or proof beyond reasonable doubt. But dismissal only has to be based on a reasonable belief of serious misconduct. The bypassing prescriptions for prescription drugs alone is such but clearly the employer has a reasonable belief she was responsible for most if not all of the 'large number' of tablets that were going missing. The employer would also have to have used a fair procedure where she would have had the right to have her union present. Do you really think that wasn't used? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Dec 22, 2022 12:42:48 GMT
I don't give a flying fuck if she stole a couple of headache tablets or not.
Working in the NHS and having to deal with the shit they deal with I'd need headache tablets, it's the perk of the job.
I don't care if she pleaded guilty or not, it is NOT a dismissal offence.
I thought it was 'tablets' as in ipads, well of course that would have been a different theft.
FFS how many times will I have to repeat this before it sinks in.
I DO NOT CARE IF SHE STOLE A COUPLE OF HEADACHE TABLETS.... GOOD ON HER.
Well she's free to take her case to an employment tribunal. Don't hold your breath waiting for that. The conviction has to be based on either a guilty plea (as in this case) or proof beyond reasonable doubt. But dismissal only has to be based on a reasonable belief of serious misconduct. The bypassing prescriptions for prescription drugs alone is such but clearly the employer has a reasonable belief she was responsible for most if not all of the 'large number' of tablets that were going missing. The employer would also have to have used a fair procedure where she would have had the right to have her union present. Do you really think that wasn't used? As I said I don't care, she took some drugs that weren't illegal in their own right, and staff should have access to non-addictive pain killer's, it probably costs the tax payers tens of thousands of pounds for cases like this, when the value of the drugs was probably a few pounds. It's yet another example of how the NHS waste money, and I hope she gets reinstated, with compensation. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Dec 22, 2022 13:20:25 GMT
I don't. I have learnt anything from the Daily Mail is just not worth the effort. I used to be on a forum frequented by a few cultists trying to disseminate brainwashing material. The stock reply was, well you can't criticise unless you have read all his books. The thing is with the Daily Mail is it has already made its money as soon as you click the link. The DM & DE are guilty of misleading headline grabbers, once you start reading them they have different connotations to the headlines.
I tend to go straight to the 'people's comments', you get more sense.
That is priceless. Whilst the 2 publications are of arguable quality, I don't think that the quality of their avid fans is much in doubt! 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Dec 22, 2022 13:25:59 GMT
The DM & DE are guilty of misleading headline grabbers, once you start reading them they have different connotations to the headlines.
I tend to go straight to the 'people's comments', you get more sense.
That is priceless. Whilst the 2 publications are of arguable quality, I don't think that the quality of their avid fans is much in doubt! 😂 If you read their comments most of them are slagging the papers off. |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Dec 22, 2022 13:29:31 GMT
She pleaded guilty as charged , why should she be reinstated Medication which we pay for was being stolen, perhaps not all down to her but possibly other members of staff have now got the message don't do it, she was trusted and she broke that trust.
|
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Dec 22, 2022 13:30:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 22, 2022 13:51:18 GMT
I don't. I have learnt anything from the Daily Mail is just not worth the effort. I used to be on a forum frequented by a few cultists trying to disseminate brainwashing material. The stock reply was, well you can't criticise unless you have read all his books. The thing is with the Daily Mail is it has already made its money as soon as you click the link. The DM & DE are guilty of misleading headline grabbers, once you start reading them they have different connotations to the headlines.
I tend to go straight to the 'people's comments', you get more sense.
The comments can be fun. They are rated as number of likes, and separately, the number of dislikes. The game is to think of the comment that wins the prestigious position of most hated, because if you view the comment on most disliked you will come top of the order. To do this one has to be aware anything insulting their intelligence blatantly will be removed, so you can't just mouth off at them. The trick is to think of something that will instantly cause a knee-jerk reaction, but in a way where anyone with any intelligence can see you are winding them up. Competition is fierce for the most hated, so it's a real challenge and something of a national sport. There have been some absolute corkers in the past. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Dec 22, 2022 13:55:08 GMT
NHS nurse is SACKED after being caught stealing two tablets from hospital pharmacy to treat her headaches while she worked.
Makes you wonder whether there was something else going on. I mean, being sacked for talking a couple of Paracetamol sounds unduly harsh to me. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Dec 22, 2022 14:00:45 GMT
NHS nurse is SACKED after being caught stealing two tablets from hospital pharmacy to treat her headaches while she worked.
Makes you wonder whether there was something else going on. I mean, being sacked for talking a couple of Paracetamol sounds unduly harsh to me. Exactly, hardly the crime of the century is it. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Dec 22, 2022 14:15:19 GMT
Makes you wonder whether there was something else going on. I mean, being sacked for talking a couple of Paracetamol sounds unduly harsh to me. Exactly, hardly the crime of the century is it. Maybe someone was jealous because she's a bit of a babe. I mean I would, wouldn't you? ![]() |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Dec 22, 2022 14:19:04 GMT
Exactly, hardly the crime of the century is it. Maybe someone was jealous because she's a bit of a babe. I mean I would, wouldn't you? ![]() LOL  you might have a point.
She's probably earning thousands on OnlyFans or hotbabe channels
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Dec 22, 2022 14:21:13 GMT
NHS nurse is SACKED after being caught stealing two tablets from hospital pharmacy to treat her headaches while she worked.
Makes you wonder whether there was something else going on. I mean, being sacked for talking a couple of Paracetamol sounds unduly harsh to me. The way the NHS mamagement splash out on drugs mate fucking paracetomol should come with a hallmark |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Dec 22, 2022 14:24:42 GMT
Exactly, hardly the crime of the century is it. Maybe someone was jealous because she's a bit of a babe. I mean I would, wouldn't you? ![]() Maybe the fact that over a certain dosage it is a controlled drug. Maybe the fact that she is a nurse and a controlled drug affects your ability. Maybe the fact that theft is theft. Now in the army I was in. A conviction of theft and you were out the door. Far less taking a controlled drug. But what the hell. |
|
you might have a point.