SNP trans reforms risk attracting sex offenders to Scotland,

Sorry mate, but if you think that is evidence you need to get out more.


I'll give you an example closer to home. There was a rape on a ward in an NHS hospital - the NHS denied that a rape had happened as there were no men on the ward. What the NHS failed to mention was that a transgender woman who biologically a man was on the ward, and had attacked another patient.

When Government Departments claim they have had no issues with 'male' predators then you really need to treat their suggestion with a great deal of suspicion.

As I think I have said somewhere before, I am not going to engage in any such behaviour with or for you. All that does is give an impression that there might be some credibility to your wriggling and squirming, when there is none whatsoever.

However, your last paragraph above is sound advice - so you should take it.

NO DIGNITY...NO HUMILITY...NO INTEGRITY..........NO WRIGGLEROOM!

I'm pointing out that government departments are quite willing to lie about the size of the problem. If you are going to base your argument on statistics produced by organisations who are actively promoting these policies then I would suggest you be a tad more skeptical.

With regards to Scotland specifically - the SPS does not hold information on whether any incidents have occurred of transgender prisoners who have transferred to woman's prison facilities going on to commit violence against female inmates, which is considered ‘a matter for the Procurator Fiscal’.

If you are not recording any instances of attacks or harassment then for sure the statistics are not going to show any attacks or harassment.

Hi pacifico

How do you know that they're linked to pro transgender movements? One is Time magazine.

I also cross referenced to other sources in other countries and the evidence all pointed one way.

But if you're sceptical then prove me wrong give me links to big numbers studies, from countries that has passed this legislation, showing an increase in predatory activities, following the legislation. I'm fairly certain you won't find it. Because I've tried and failed to find it. Sometimes what you can't find tells you as much as what you do.

I've been all over the feminist sides that tried to block the legislation, and their evidence is individual examples. Nothing else. Even examples that have dubious connectivity with this issue. For example linking peadophiles with transgender issues. Which just throws bogeymen in.

I can give you links galore if you want.

Despite all I have written, I'm going to concede something. All my evidence will not stop many women FEELING less safe, if this legislation eventually gets through. That feeling may not be based on much, but it will still be there. How much weight you put on that, I don't know.

Finally, on rereading one of my links, something struck me. Some states in the USA have this type of legislation and some don't, and they appear to handle it. Makes one think about the UK government objections?

Rapist Adam Graham will not be imprisoned in a women's prison despite claiming to be transgender, changing his name and putting on a wig and makeup.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-64413242

Hi vinny


Yet another individual example. That doesn't prove anything