|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 26, 2022 21:41:26 GMT
Sandy you asked ' can people in this country in law be discriminated against to their specific disadvantage based solely on their ethnicity? '
You got a full unambiguous and further detail answer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Dec 26, 2022 21:44:43 GMT
Look you asked a question and you got a clear and relevant answer with an illustrative example. Seems you didn't want to ask that question at all but don't blame me for that. I asked a question you dodged, are you also dodging this one. You know very well what I was asking in furtherance of my point. What  Steve dodging a question? Surely not. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 26, 2022 21:48:39 GMT
And indeed not as those that can read can clearly see
|
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 26, 2022 21:49:15 GMT
Sandy you asked ' can people in this country in law be discriminated against to their specific disadvantage based solely on their ethnicity? 'You got a full unambiguous and further detail answer. However you gave an answer concerning a disabled man. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 26, 2022 21:58:17 GMT
Sandy you asked ' can people in this country in law be discriminated against to their specific disadvantage based solely on their ethnicity? 'You got a full unambiguous and further detail answer. However you gave an answer concerning a disabled man. Give me fucking strength You asked ' can people in this country in law be discriminated against to their specific disadvantage based solely on their ethnicity? 'I answered: 'Yes' To help you understand further, I added 'and their gender etc. A white bloke with a stutter and a gammy leg stands no chance of getting the lead part in a Supremes tribute act, quite legally.'One would have to be quite extraordinarily dim to think that was only about the disabled so I can only conclude you are trolling again. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Dec 26, 2022 22:05:18 GMT
And indeed not as those that can read can clearly see What on earth was that^ I trust stopper is off the decanter. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 26, 2022 22:07:31 GMT
However you gave an answer concerning a disabled man. Give me fucking strength You asked ' can people in this country in law be discriminated against to their specific disadvantage based solely on their ethnicity? 'I answered: 'Yes' To help you understand further, I added 'and their gender etc. A white bloke with a stutter and a gammy leg stands no chance of getting the lead part in a Supremes tribute act, quite legally.'One would have to be quite extraordinarily dim to think that was only about the disabled so I can only conclude you are trolling again. Well give a clear and unambiguous answer to the next question. I will make it easy for you, can a person be legally discriminated against for employment or training based solely on his ethnicity? |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Dec 26, 2022 22:38:40 GMT
Give me fucking strength You asked ' can people in this country in law be discriminated against to their specific disadvantage based solely on their ethnicity? 'I answered: 'Yes' To help you understand further, I added 'and their gender etc. A white bloke with a stutter and a gammy leg stands no chance of getting the lead part in a Supremes tribute act, quite legally.'One would have to be quite extraordinarily dim to think that was only about the disabled so I can only conclude you are trolling again. Well give a clear and unambiguous answer to the next question. I will make it easy for you, can a person be legally discriminated against for employment or training based solely on his ethnicity? Yes - is this news? |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 26, 2022 23:45:30 GMT
Well give a clear and unambiguous answer to the next question. I will make it easy for you, can a person be legally discriminated against for employment or training based solely on his ethnicity? Yes - is this news? Quite. Sandy clearly can't read and process the already given answer. Truth is he keeps asking the wrong question but after the litany of his recent posts, I'm not going to help him. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 27, 2022 16:16:57 GMT
Quite. Sandy clearly can't read and process the already given answer. Truth is he keeps asking the wrong question but after the litany of his recent posts, I'm not going to help him. You never do but then we do not deem to be here to debate and consider positions it seems to be one must win, which is a shame. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 27, 2022 20:25:54 GMT
No Sandy you asked a question, you got a clear unambiguous answer. I wasn't playing your silly games again
|
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 27, 2022 22:15:04 GMT
No Sandy you asked a question, you got a clear unambiguous answer. I wasn't playing your silly games again The denial of a person's human rights is a 'silly game'? At least we know where we stand. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 27, 2022 22:23:46 GMT
No Sandy you asked a question, you got a clear unambiguous answer. I wasn't playing your silly games again The denial of a person's human rights is a 'silly game'? At least we know where we stand. And there he goes again  You were proved wrong on your delusions about denial of human rights, you in denial you got your question answered and frankly Sandy this line of yours is a great big pain in the neck of false allegations. You were wrong, live with it. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 27, 2022 22:30:51 GMT
The denial of a person's human rights is a 'silly game'? At least we know where we stand. And there he goes again You were proved wrong on your delusions about denial of human rights, you in denial you got your question answered and frankly Sandy this line of yours is a great big pain in the neck of false allegations. You were wrong, live with it. I am glad to see you refer to it as a delusion which kind of answers the question. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 28, 2022 0:34:29 GMT
yes or no Sandy is your argument that we Brits have no human rights at all despite the HRA because you imagine that legal positive discrimination in employment somehow repealed the HRA?
|
|
Steve dodging a question? Surely not.
