|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 23, 2024 11:25:00 GMT
Met Police claimed imam’s sermon saying ‘destroy Jewish homes’ is not a crimeA preacher at an east London mosque called for Jewish homes to be destroyed He said: “Oh Allah, curse the Jews and the children of Israel. Oh Allah, curse the infidels and the polytheists. “Oh Allah, break their words, shake their feet, disperse and tear apart their unity and ruin their houses and destroy their homes.” The Met concluded that “it does not meet the threshold of a crime.” But after outrage on X the force said it would urgently review its decision. It wrote: “We recognise the significant concerns around our decision and we will review this outcome urgently.” After reviewing the case, the Met said it had passed a file to the CPS in October. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/21/met-police-claimed-imams-sermon-saying-destroy-jewish-homes/I wonder what the reaction from the Met would be if someone called for the destruction of Muslim homes?..
|
|
|
Post by morayloon on Nov 24, 2024 23:57:34 GMT
Met Police claimed imam’s sermon saying ‘destroy Jewish homes’ is not a crimeA preacher at an east London mosque called for Jewish homes to be destroyed He said: “Oh Allah, curse the Jews and the children of Israel. Oh Allah, curse the infidels and the polytheists. “Oh Allah, break their words, shake their feet, disperse and tear apart their unity and ruin their houses and destroy their homes.” The Met concluded that “it does not meet the threshold of a crime.” But after outrage on X the force said it would urgently review its decision. It wrote: “We recognise the significant concerns around our decision and we will review this outcome urgently.” After reviewing the case, the Met said it had passed a file to the CPS in October. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/21/met-police-claimed-imams-sermon-saying-destroy-jewish-homes/I wonder what the reaction from the Met would be if someone called for the destruction of Muslim homes?.. Don't read the Telegraph. Perhaps you could let me know where it stands on the destruction of Gaza, and the settlers war crimes in the West Bank?
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Nov 25, 2024 6:59:43 GMT
Met Police claimed imam’s sermon saying ‘destroy Jewish homes’ is not a crimeA preacher at an east London mosque called for Jewish homes to be destroyed He said: “Oh Allah, curse the Jews and the children of Israel. Oh Allah, curse the infidels and the polytheists. “Oh Allah, break their words, shake their feet, disperse and tear apart their unity and ruin their houses and destroy their homes.” The Met concluded that “it does not meet the threshold of a crime.” But after outrage on X the force said it would urgently review its decision. It wrote: “We recognise the significant concerns around our decision and we will review this outcome urgently.” After reviewing the case, the Met said it had passed a file to the CPS in October. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/21/met-police-claimed-imams-sermon-saying-destroy-jewish-homes/I wonder what the reaction from the Met would be if someone called for the destruction of Muslim homes?.. Don't read the Telegraph. Perhaps you could let me know where it stands on the destruction of Gaza, and the settlers war crimes in the West Bank? What does any of that have to do with Muslim leaders in London encouraging others to destroy the homes of non-Muslims and wage Jihad in the UK?
Dutch House of Reps votes to close mosques that preach destruction of Jews, Israel
It's a start, but over here in the UK the Labour government relies on a two-tier system.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Nov 25, 2024 9:50:13 GMT
Met Police claimed imam’s sermon saying ‘destroy Jewish homes’ is not a crimeA preacher at an east London mosque called for Jewish homes to be destroyed He said: “Oh Allah, curse the Jews and the children of Israel. Oh Allah, curse the infidels and the polytheists. “Oh Allah, break their words, shake their feet, disperse and tear apart their unity and ruin their houses and destroy their homes.” The Met concluded that “it does not meet the threshold of a crime.” But after outrage on X the force said it would urgently review its decision. It wrote: “We recognise the significant concerns around our decision and we will review this outcome urgently.” After reviewing the case, the Met said it had passed a file to the CPS in October. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/21/met-police-claimed-imams-sermon-saying-destroy-jewish-homes/I wonder what the reaction from the Met would be if someone called for the destruction of Muslim homes?.. What, you mean like Netanyahu has done o routinely and repeatedly for about 80 years now. That isn't a hate crime so why should the reverse be ?
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Nov 25, 2024 9:53:22 GMT
Lock up the Imam.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 25, 2024 10:42:05 GMT
What, you mean like Netanyahu has done o routinely and repeatedly for about 80 years now. That isn't a hate crime so why should the reverse be ? You claim Netanyahu has been calling for the destruction of Muslim homes for 80 years? Pillock.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 25, 2024 11:10:52 GMT
Met Police claimed imam’s sermon saying ‘destroy Jewish homes’ is not a crimeA preacher at an east London mosque called for Jewish homes to be destroyed He said: “Oh Allah, curse the Jews and the children of Israel. Oh Allah, curse the infidels and the polytheists. “Oh Allah, break their words, shake their feet, disperse and tear apart their unity and ruin their houses and destroy their homes.” The Met concluded that “it does not meet the threshold of a crime.” But after outrage on X the force said it would urgently review its decision. It wrote: “We recognise the significant concerns around our decision and we will review this outcome urgently.” After reviewing the case, the Met said it had passed a file to the CPS in October. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/21/met-police-claimed-imams-sermon-saying-destroy-jewish-homes/I wonder what the reaction from the Met would be if someone called for the destruction of Muslim homes?.. Don't read the Telegraph. Perhaps you could let me know where it stands on the destruction of Gaza, and the settlers war crimes in the West Bank? What has that got to do with the police in the UK, who said calling for the destruction of Jewish homes is not a hate crime/incident? What do you think the police reaction would have been if someone in the UK, had called for the destruction of Muslim homes? Another case of two tier policing?..
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Nov 25, 2024 11:47:12 GMT
What, you mean like Netanyahu has done o routinely and repeatedly for about 80 years now. That isn't a hate crime so why should the reverse be ? You claim Netanyahu has been calling for the destruction of Muslim homes for 80 years? Pillock. I refer you to the speech made in the house of commons by a very Jewish critic of Israeli settlement / Palestinian land clearance, the late Gerald Kaufman. Come on Red you're better than this you know exactly what point I am making. Netsnyahu is more than eager to destroy Palestinian homes by any and every means at his disposal, and while that has exacerbated with the current makeup of the Knesset in which he is dependent on a pro-genocide cult in the chamber for his own party's political power, he has been more than willing to bulldoze and landgrab, a policy that the Jewish state has engaged in from the very start. We currently have a situation where the US naturally condemn the court THEY invented for it's decision to issue warrants for ALL sides in the Gaza killings and threaten Putinesque vengeance upon any who thinks of delivering Netanyahu into the hands of that same court they were more than happy to see Hitlers colleagues hung by, I see zero difference between Jews bulldozing Palestinian homes to illegally build Jewish settlements as they have done throughout my entire adult life and the leaders of those the Jews have bulldozed calling for the same in the other direction.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 25, 2024 12:03:46 GMT
You claim Netanyahu has been calling for the destruction of Muslim homes for 80 years? Pillock. I refer you to the speech made in the house of commons by a very Jewish critic of Israeli settlement / Palestinian land clearance, the late Gerald Kaufman. Come on Red you're better than this you know exactly what point I am making. Netsnyahu is more than eager to destroy Palestinian homes by any and every means at his disposal, and while that has exacerbated with the current makeup of the Knesset in which he is dependent on a pro-genocide cult in the chamber for his own party's political power, he has been more than willing to bulldoze and landgrab, a policy that the Jewish state has engaged in from the very start. We currently have a situation where the US naturally condemn the court THEY invented for it's decision to issue warrants for ALL sides in the Gaza killings and threaten Putinesque vengeance upon any who thinks of delivering Netanyahu into the hands of that same court they were more than happy to see Hitlers colleagues hung by, I see zero difference between Jews bulldozing Palestinian homes to illegally build Jewish settlements as they have done throughout my entire adult life and the leaders of those the Jews have bulldozed calling for the same in the other direction. I am not clear on the equivalence here. Netanyahu is not subject to UK law. The Imam is subject to UK law. He did not call for only Zionist homes to be destroyed he called for Jewish and Infidel homes to be destroyed and asked Allah to intervene on his behalf. Unfortunately there is a very large group who believe that carrying out the will of Allah is a sure fire way to beautiful eternity. This man is invoking in his prayers the destruction of everything not Muslim and some will be only too happy to be the tool of Allah to answer his prayer call. We have to consider what would happen if a COE vicar made a similar call as regards Muslims and that is equivalence. It would be regarded as Islamophobic, intolerant and criminal.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Nov 25, 2024 12:12:31 GMT
Met Police claimed imam’s sermon saying ‘destroy Jewish homes’ is not a crimeA preacher at an east London mosque called for Jewish homes to be destroyed He said: “Oh Allah, curse the Jews and the children of Israel. Oh Allah, curse the infidels and the polytheists. “Oh Allah, break their words, shake their feet, disperse and tear apart their unity and ruin their houses and destroy their homes.” The Met concluded that “it does not meet the threshold of a crime.” But after outrage on X the force said it would urgently review its decision. It wrote: “We recognise the significant concerns around our decision and we will review this outcome urgently.” After reviewing the case, the Met said it had passed a file to the CPS in October. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/21/met-police-claimed-imams-sermon-saying-destroy-jewish-homes/I wonder what the reaction from the Met would be if someone called for the destruction of Muslim homes?.. The problem the Police have is they are not Lawyers or Barristers therefore they are not fully conversant with all the laws of the land, what constitutes a crime or not in full details that is why that responsibility was taken away from them 44 years ago, since then the CPS decides who should be charged and put before a Court or not and the relevant Criminal Legislation of the Law that apply IMHO the Senior Officer who made the decision not to take action should have sent the report and full details to the CPS to say yes those words and behaviour is a crime and the man should be arrested and this is what the charge should be, or no not a crime no further action can be taken. As per usual dammed if they do dammed if they don't
|
|
|
Post by seniorcitizen007 on Nov 25, 2024 20:34:28 GMT
The Judeo/Christian/Moslem faiths depend on hate to maintain their authority over their devotees.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 25, 2024 20:48:16 GMT
The Judeo/Christian/Moslem faiths depend on hate to maintain their authority over their devotees. Which is ironic..for Christianity anyway.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 26, 2024 6:41:03 GMT
The problem the Police have is they are not Lawyers or Barristers therefore they are not fully conversant with all the laws of the land, what constitutes a crime or not in full details... But that doesn't stop them jumping in with both feet elsewhere, does it? It says much that the police can threaten someone over a year old, deleted, tweet but ignore an obvious hate crimes being carried out right there and then.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Nov 26, 2024 8:56:32 GMT
The problem the Police have is they are not Lawyers or Barristers therefore they are not fully conversant with all the laws of the land, what constitutes a crime or not in full details... But that doesn't stop them jumping in with both feet elsewhere, does it? It says much that the police can threaten someone over a year old, deleted, tweet but ignore an obvious hate crimes being carried out right there and then. I agree 100% they need to get back to basic Policing which basically is to keep the Kings Peace protect life and property, not dealing with hurt feelings because someone said something I did not like , expected to be Psycatric Nurses, deal with hurt feelings someone said something to me I did not like about my sexuality, or my Political opinions, etc I blame poor and bad leadership in the Police , some idiot in British Transport Police has now in their wisdom has approved Transgender male Officers can carry out intimate strip searches of female suspects , what a LOB All this nonsense is in now rife on line, in many workplaces Universities, NHS, Local Councils, Schools, all walks of life discipline and common sense is no longer as common as it used to be Freedom of Speech is under severe threat from minority groups that want to silence others who have different opinions, time the silent or silenced majority said enough is enough grow up
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Nov 26, 2024 13:38:06 GMT
The Labour supporters on here obviously agree with this Imam.
|
|