|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 10, 2022 12:02:40 GMT
But those who say that Parliament acted undemocratically prior to 2019 are wrong, right? Undemocratically about what?. You heard it hear first, Folks. Pacifico now says that Parliament was completely within its rights to ignore the result of the referendum. The Remainer Parliament was acting completely democratically when it stymied the referendum result, and it would have been acting completely democratically had it completely ignored it. Anyone who disagrees with this proposition will have to deal with Pacifico. And you don't want that. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Dec 10, 2022 12:03:54 GMT
Undemocratically about what?. You heard it hear first, Folks. Pacifico now says that Parliament was completely within its rights to ignore the result of the referendum. The Remainer Parliament was acting completely democratically when it stymied the referendum result, and it would have been acting completely democratically had it completely ignored it. Anyone who disagrees with this proposition will have to deal with Pacifico. And you don't want that. LOL - have you only just discovered that?..  |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 10, 2022 12:05:02 GMT
You heard it hear first, Folks. Pacifico now says that Parliament was completely within its rights to ignore the result of the referendum. The Remainer Parliament was acting completely democratically when it stymied the referendum result, and it would have been acting completely democratically had it completely ignored it. Anyone who disagrees with this proposition will have to deal with Pacifico. And you don't want that. LOL - have you only just discovered that?.. Yep. You have to start vocalising your true feelings, Doc. |
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on Dec 10, 2022 13:15:22 GMT
This is an attempt to stop the new thread re the 2016 referendum going off on a tangent. It has been pointed out that the High Court has decided that the 2016 referendum was undemocratic, but could not be set aside because it was not binding on the government. Believing attack is the best form of defence, some Brexiters have decided to make the 1975 referendum the main issue. Let's discuss that here, instead. Was the 1975 referendum democratic? Any links, let's see the context? |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 10, 2022 13:17:13 GMT
This is an attempt to stop the new thread re the 2016 referendum going off on a tangent. It has been pointed out that the High Court has decided that the 2016 referendum was undemocratic, but could not be set aside because it was not binding on the government. Believing attack is the best form of defence, some Brexiters have decided to make the 1975 referendum the main issue. Let's discuss that here, instead. Was the 1975 referendum democratic? Any links, let's see the context? See the OP in the 2016 thread. |
|
