Spanish Scientists develop 60% efficiency solar panels

But it is. EV's reduce emissions making the world safer. 

Its a stupid argument in the first place, so many other factors
1, Where the wear effects humans
2, How many humans are effected
3, How much extra wear an EV causes
4, That extra wear times the minute number effected by this. 

Its just the last few things left to hold against EV's as all the big ones disappear. 

Range anxiety, History
Charging stations, Thousands of them now.
Cost, Outweighed by running cost savings
Carbon footprint, Proven to be less over the vehicle life.
Mining slavery, Lithium comes from Australia in the main

Now we're down to tyre wear. Lol. 

I hate to break it to these people, but in the future, in many countries there won't be tyre wear as there won't be roads to wear them. It's all down to one number really, which is Wh/kg. Solid state batteries due in a  couple of years will deliver 500. I would guess in the medium term that can be at least doubled, and at that point there would really be no reason to have roads. Flying cars will be cheaper than their competitors on the roads. If you build a car, an EV eliminates all the complicated ICE engineering. If you eliminate the wheels you are effectively replacing them with much cheaper blades, but what you do not need is the suspension system and drive chain. You have even less in terms of moving parts to wear out and go wrong. The only reason they are $200k now is they are very low production and cost  a lot in research. What we need to look at though is the marginal cost of production in a mass market. We pay a premium for aircraft grade parts now, but in fact if they were mass produced they would be more reliable, as they would get far more testing and refinement, just as a Ford Mondeo is far more reliable than a Ferrari.

These wondrous vehicles will be held aloft by the batteries of the central committee

Death by climate change …the cult of net zero’s equivalent of the book of revelation .

Or scientific research. 
I'm in the cult of IPCC NOAA and NASA. 

China isn't,

The third world is a how you want us to be

The US might under Trump, who knows.

China wanted to rush into Nuclear but were asked to slow down for safety reasons. 
China produced 35% of its energy from clean power in 2023, despite being the worlds manufacturer. They do recognise the dangers of climate change. 

Climate change is not political which is great. It means the huge cost of flooding in China is the same incentive for change as the huge cost of Hurricanes in America. 

You want us to be like the third world and not do anything about climate change. I say we are first world, well just.