|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 20, 2024 22:49:08 GMT
So 4950 excess deaths when all pensioners had the WFP - and now you want to deprive hundreds of thousands of them of that payment. It's easy to see why the Labour Party are expecting another 4000 to die. I suppose that will teach them for not voting for Labour... |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 20, 2024 22:56:10 GMT
So 4950 excess deaths when all pensioners had the WFP - and now you want to deprive hundreds of thousands of them of that payment. It's easy to see why the Labour Party are expecting another 4000 to die. I suppose that will teach them for not voting for Labour... im no mathematician im sure 5,000 is higher then 4000 |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 20, 2024 23:02:42 GMT
So 4950 excess deaths when all pensioners had the WFP - and now you want to deprive hundreds of thousands of them of that payment. It's easy to see why the Labour Party are expecting another 4000 to die. I suppose that will teach them for not voting for Labour... im no mathematician im sure 5,000 is higher then 4000 correct you are no mathematician. 4950 plus 4000 is 8950 - ask the Labour Party. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 20, 2024 23:26:43 GMT
im no mathematician im sure 5,000 is higher then 4000 correct you are no mathematician. 4950 plus 4000 is 8950 - ask the Labour Party. 😁 |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 20, 2024 23:30:48 GMT
im no mathematician im sure 5,000 is higher then 4000 correct you are no mathematician. 4950 plus 4000 is 8950 - ask the Labour Party. what you think starmer was saying a extra 4000 will die n o think he was saying nothing extra in the death toll |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 21, 2024 8:03:58 GMT
correct you are no mathematician. 4950 plus 4000 is 8950 - ask the Labour Party. what you think starmer was saying a extra 4000 will die n o think he was saying nothing extra in the death toll either 4000 extra will die or the Labour Party was lying.. ..your choice. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 21, 2024 8:46:55 GMT
Surely if we got rid of them we wouldn't need more tax. Just think of all those proton scanners. And a Rainbow crossing = a new hospital. And just think: If your auntie had balls, she'd be your uncle. And if you had a brain cell you'd be able to formulate a cogent point. And that's never happening either.😚 You're just a leftie idiot. We all know that cutting diversity managers and rainbow crossings would pay for all the fantastic new treatments and devices the NHS has in 2024 compared to 1950. Only a stupid leftie would think that is going to require more money than it used to. Us right wingers all know you can have it all without paying more tax. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Nov 21, 2024 8:51:48 GMT
So Inflation - up Taxes - up Unemployment - up Energy bills - up Growth - down Wages - down The truth on her CV - down Rachel Reeves is hopeless and should resign. While the incredibly biased Rightists who probably never even bothered to think about what this country needs and what this government is trying to do for the future benefit of this country, just treat it as an opportunity for nasty dishonest dark rhetoric. Such limited thinking is a sure sign of seriously ingrained political bias. I would say the bias is yours. Is every statement in Pacifico's post above true or not? |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 21, 2024 9:17:44 GMT
And just think: If your auntie had balls, she'd be your uncle. And if you had a brain cell you'd be able to formulate a cogent point. And that's never happening either.😚 You're just a leftie idiot. We all know that cutting diversity managers and rainbow crossings would pay for all the fantastic new treatments and devices the NHS has in 2024 compared to 1950. Only a stupid leftie would think that is going to require more money than it used to. Us right wingers all know you can have it all without paying more tax. Another slow day on the bore 'em Forum, Zany? 🤣 |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 21, 2024 11:54:12 GMT
what you think starmer was saying a extra 4000 will die n o think he was saying nothing extra in the death toll either 4000 extra will die or the Labour Party was lying.. ..your choice. so me where he says a extra 4000 will die |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 21, 2024 18:17:45 GMT
either 4000 extra will die or the Labour Party was lying.. ..your choice. so me where he says a extra 4000 will die  |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 21, 2024 19:05:44 GMT
so me where he says a extra 4000 will die ii known you post that it say 4000 not a extra 4000 like i said |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Nov 21, 2024 19:12:59 GMT
So 4950 excess deaths when all pensioners had the WFP - and now you want to deprive hundreds of thousands of them of that payment. It's easy to see why the Labour Party are expecting another 4000 to die. I suppose that will teach them for not voting for Labour... im no mathematician im sure 5,000 is higher then 4000 correct you are no mathematician. 4950 plus 4000 is 8950 - ask the Labour Party. ii known you post that it say 4000 not a extra 4000 like i said ^^ 24/7 around the clock trolling doesn't allow for anything to sink in. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Nov 21, 2024 21:46:29 GMT
ii known you post that it say 4000 not a extra 4000 like i said That makes it okay then. Jesus wept. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 21, 2024 21:57:52 GMT
ii known you post that it say 4000 not a extra 4000 like i said That makes it okay then. Jesus wept. i posted a post that shows last year 4590 died what im saying that if 4000 die during winter there no change in the deaths |
|
