|
Post by jonksy on Oct 14, 2024 1:06:45 GMT
Pillock Lammy and jug ears wants you're hard earned cash...
‘Doesn’t change anything!’ David Lammy tipped to cave in to Caribbean’s ‘ludicrous’ £200bn reparations demand.....
Foreign Secretary David Lammy will cave and send hundreds of billions in reparations to the Caribbean, political commentator Emma Woolf has predicted.
It comes after it was revealed King Charles and Keir Starmer are readying themselves for a £200bn demand from 15 Caribbean governments, according to the Daily Mail.
The Prime Minister of Barbados told the United Nations that a ‘global reset’ is required on slavery and colonialism, and reparations are a part of that process.
Speaking on GB News, Woolf said she expects the Labour Government to accommodate demands.......
“Money doesn’t change the past”, she argued.
“It’s far more meaningful to acknowledge the past, learn from history and make positive changes for the future........
“Every time we have one of these Commonwealth heads of state summit, there are demands for huge amounts of money. £200bn puts our fiscal black hole into the shade, doesn’t it?
“Presumably, we will end up giving billions and billions of pounds. Given that our Foreign Secretary David Lammy has been very vocal about this.....
|
|
|
Post by piglet on Oct 17, 2024 11:25:01 GMT
And he will, hes carribean, he said so himself.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 17, 2024 12:24:36 GMT
The way it works in politics is these people are given these jobs so the leader can dictate what they all do. Starmer is the man in charge, not him. The shit will fall on Starmer's head if our economy goes tits up. I'm keeping an open mind regarding Starmer's ability to improve our economy. This is because when the Tories ran the government the policies were so stupid that it leaves the next man with a huge scope for improvement. It is much easier to gain x amount of GDP growth in a poor and chaotic country than one where everything is well thought out and hightly organised. It's simply you have a low base to improve upon. If we look at the markets right now we actually see that as far as investors are concerned, they have a fair degree of confidence so the figures look OK to good. If there has been any change, it has been positive. We certainly don't see a collapse in confidence as it was around the time of Liz truss suffering the poor management of Andrew Bailey. So given this picture, I can't see Starmer sanctioning such a demand. I think it is Daily Mail hot air and bluster. We do not have 200 billion to spare and of course if we do it for one then the whole world of greedy pigs will want some as well. Look how long it took for Iran to get their cash back. Their claim was actually legit though, as they had paid in cash and not received the goods.
Also one other point is you can have two leaders, one who is totally stupid and one who is half smart. Which one will give the better result. You could say it is obvious. The half smart one will. However, supposing the half smart one figured he was totally smart and made every decision himself, whereas the totality stupid person thought, I can't do any of this so I will delegate the job to a team of economic experts.
|
|
|
Post by piglet on Oct 18, 2024 9:55:45 GMT
I do start reading your posts then stop when i hit bull, but i read all of this, and it makes sense, Starmer can succeed if he wants too. Dont bet on it though, socialism has hidden depths of incompetence.
|
|