|
|
Post by witchfinder on Oct 13, 2024 12:16:59 GMT
Is it not time for a review of all advertising standards ? I am bitterly opposed to analytic cookies, the term I use is "Intrusive Advertising" and I believe it should be stopped full stop. We get absolutely plagued by advertising everywhere, it partially spoils internet browsing for example. On TV these days, I cannot watch most commercial stations due to the amount of adverts, the length of commercial breaks, watching anything on most commercial channels is not enjoyable. The only way around it would be to regulate the number of channels available, personaly I think ten commercial channels + the BBC is more than enough, instead of the hundreds we have now mostly putting out Tripe. Analytic cookies on Facebook is particularly intrusive, you click on a holiday or weekend break website, and you are inundated by holiday ads everywhere you go on Facebook. The analytics and advertising are what pay for the Internet and social media, fiddles. They don't provide a platform for free. You can advertise without Personalised Advertising, it was not that long ago that the internet and Facebook etc seemed to survive quite well on General Advertising and banner adverts, without the advertisers following you around everywhere. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 13, 2024 12:17:56 GMT
The analytics and advertising are what pay for the Internet and social media, fiddles. They don't provide a platform for free. Well, correct, but fails to take account of scale. Internet and Social Media intrusive advertising could be slashed by 90% and the providers of those things would still make $Billions in profit every year. The reason for the scale of intrusive advertising is greed.All The Best Or control of the masses... |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Oct 13, 2024 12:23:48 GMT
Well, correct, but fails to take account of scale. Internet and Social Media intrusive advertising could be slashed by 90% and the providers of those things would still make $Billions in profit every year. The reason for the scale of intrusive advertising is greed.All The Best Or control of the masses... But does that work? All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 13, 2024 12:29:45 GMT
Or control of the masses... But does that work? All The Best Ask the man who stated that mosques should be burnt down on arsebook... |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Oct 13, 2024 16:25:23 GMT
But does that work? All The Best Ask the man who stated that mosques should be burnt down on arsebook... I was asking you, you made the point. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 13, 2024 17:22:04 GMT
There are also copyright laws as well. When using copyrighted quotes the law says you must attribute them to the copyright owner. I guess the troll is just going to be spamming cut and pastes with missing context and sources from here on. The total retardation of the forum whilst its Islamist mates continue to spam lies in support of Hamas/Hezbollah. Yahoo News
You can check it by searching on a line of text in Google. I spotted it because it was perfect grammar!
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 13, 2024 17:35:24 GMT
Ask the man who stated that mosques should be burnt down on arsebook... I was asking you, you made the point. All The Best And I answered you FFS... |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 13, 2024 17:43:27 GMT
I was asking you, you made the point. All The Best And I answered you FFS... Your so called answer was not an answer, it was deviation. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 13, 2024 17:51:08 GMT
And I answered you FFS... Your so called answer was not an answer, it was deviation. Oh dear does PV need your help now he has lost the arguement? It was NOT an attempted deviaton FFS...Do you think it's OK for a man to be jailed for 2 years for a remark he made on arsebook whilst those who attacked police officers at Manchester Airport are ignored by the lefty dictators we now have in power? |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 13, 2024 18:43:58 GMT
Ask the man who stated that mosques should be burnt down on arsebook... I was asking you, you made the point. All The Best Jonksy's post was clearly rhetorical. Well, clear to all but the most deliberately obtuse posters maybe. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Oct 13, 2024 19:32:44 GMT
Do you think it's OK for a man to be jailed for 2 years for a remark he made on arsebook If it is a threat, yes. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 13, 2024 19:52:54 GMT
Do you think it's OK for a man to be jailed for 2 years for a remark he made on arsebook If it is a threat, yes. Did he threaten to burn down mosques? No he didn't andrea, it was probably just a casual remark. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 13, 2024 20:13:21 GMT
Do you think it's OK for a man to be jailed for 2 years for a remark he made on arsebook If it is a threat, yes. Just like you calling someone a retard is also classed as a 'hate crime'
so you should be banged up by your own definition.
HYPOCRITE andrea
"Retard"
The R-word is a form of hate speech that stands for “retard,” “retarded,” or other offensive words ending in “-tard.” While “mental retardation” was originally introduced as a medical term in 1961 for people with intellectual disabilities, in the decades since, the R-word has become an insult used all too commonly in everyday language. Those who use the R-word often do so with little regard for the pain it causes people with intellectual disabilities—and the exclusion it perpetuates in our society.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 13, 2024 20:14:25 GMT
Dumb fucker ^^
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 13, 2024 21:29:19 GMT
Do you think it's OK for a man to be jailed for 2 years for a remark he made on arsebook If it is a threat, yes. Why? |
|
