|
Post by johnofgwent on Oct 17, 2024 15:35:38 GMT
We need to stop been so rigid in political dogma, as a Labour voter I recognise the achievement of prodicing the first female Prime Minister, the first Prime Minister of Asian origin. "producing the first prime minister of Asian origin" is nothing to sing and dance about when the individual ia a prize twat who can't do the fucking job, doesn't give a shit about the fact the cost of living is through the roof and is far more interested in making sure his wife isn't slapped with the £230MILLION tax bill she would be slapoed with if she wasnt Indian We had the first BLACK First Minister and Scotland had the first Moslem one. The black Zambian was corrupt to the core and accused everyone who pointed this out of being a racist, and the Scottish First Minister had no idea what frauds were going on under his nose. Appointing a black, a brown, a Moslem or a Jew because they are that, and celebrating that this has been done, just makes you look a bigger idiot for supporting the promotion of diversity over competence
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Oct 17, 2024 15:40:51 GMT
My boy applied to join the police, he was told that all places for white entrants had been taken and invited to reapply in two years time. He didn't even get an interview because he had white skin. Diversity, or racism? Which force was it? I know that Avon & Somerset were successfully sued for exactly that. Dorset. Yes I know ' Dorset' ffs. Hardly a hot bed of racial tension.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 17, 2024 16:09:55 GMT
We need to stop been so rigid in political dogma, as a Labour voter I recognise the achievement of prodicing the first female Prime Minister, the first Prime Minister of Asian origin. Its not what people are in terms of ethnicity, background or faith etc, its more what they believe in and their principles that bothers me. Robert Jenrick for example - The man who ordered childrens cartoon figures of Mickey Mouse etc to be painted over in an asylum seeker containing young kids. What a nasty, vindictive, despicable excuse of a human being. Badenoch or Jenrick, YUK I want to puke You need to watch yourself though. Put it this way. Look at me for a moment as BvL the psychiatrist and you are on the couch. Well if I were to proffer my professional opinion, i.e. what is meant as the disinterested scientific and learned approach rather than anything personal, I would note that you select that out of all the things Jenrick has said and done. I would go on to question why you select that one and I would note two things in particular. The first is the implications of him ordering that are absolutely trivial in the context of the country as a whole. It's not a multibillion pound trade deal or anything we might feel as a citizen of the country. The second thing that stands out is the way the thing highlighted appeals to the emotions. It's one of those things that makes you want to cry. I would further note this was featured across the tabloid media who use emotional stuff as a form of propaganda, and then I would finally tot it all up and say to you, I think you would be better off changing your subscriptions to the morning papers.
By the way, back to your point. I think if I were in his shoes I might have done the same. I don't know the exact circumstances and I think if I did it would be clearer why he ordered it, but what is it doing on those walls anyway. These people are from primitive foreign war-torn countries and few know a word of English, never mind who Mickey Mouse is. What do we hope to achieve by Americanising them upon arrival, and you know the copyright is owned by Disney. They would need their permission to reproduce. Copyright law states a picture is a 'whole work'. It's not a quote where there is fair use clauses.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 20, 2024 17:41:16 GMT
Some guy on social media was saying today he reckons it is a dead cert Badenough will win over Jenrick. This is surprising me that they should choose a Nigerian, but following Sod's law, which I hate to do, it seems the blighters could well put their foot in it yet again. We're back to what things were looking like at the beginning of the op. I had some hope and now I'm losing faith once more. This guy by the way, reads all this shit that goes on as a profession, and he cites Con Home. That's even more surprising in that i thought Con Home was supposed to be agaisnt immigration. Voting for one is just madness.
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Oct 21, 2024 7:05:17 GMT
That's even more surprising in that i thought Con Home was supposed to be agaisnt immigration. Immigration is something to be managed, not something that you're "for" or "against".
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 21, 2024 7:10:46 GMT
That's even more surprising in that i thought Con Home was supposed to be agaisnt immigration. Immigration is something to be managed, not something that you're "for" or "against".BOLLOCKS
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 21, 2024 9:29:10 GMT
That's even more surprising in that i thought Con Home was supposed to be agaisnt immigration. Immigration is something to be managed, not something that you're "for" or "against". Are you trying to control my thinking?
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Oct 21, 2024 9:39:54 GMT
Best way to do business.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 21, 2024 10:03:01 GMT
That's even more surprising in that i thought Con Home was supposed to be agaisnt immigration. Immigration is something to be managed, not something that you're "for" or "against". Western leftie liberal mindset ^ If you are against immigration in principle then you are a racist and far right .
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Oct 21, 2024 10:08:03 GMT
That's even more surprising in that i thought Con Home was supposed to be agaisnt immigration. Immigration is something to be managed, not something that you're "for" or "against". And clearly that is not happening is it?
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Oct 21, 2024 10:31:39 GMT
That's even more surprising in that i thought Con Home was supposed to be agaisnt immigration. Immigration is something to be managed, not something that you're "for" or "against". That sounds awfully like the standard liberal narrative that immigration is not only inevitable, it's also irresistible as in 'lie back and enjoy it'.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 21, 2024 10:37:35 GMT
Yup. “ We should let them in because of the ‘ Empire’ and we can’t stop them anyway”.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 21, 2024 11:20:42 GMT
No it isn't. The best way to do business is provide the best service for the cheapest price.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 21, 2024 11:30:29 GMT
Immigration is something to be managed, not something that you're "for" or "against". That sounds awfully like the standard liberal narrative that immigration is not only inevitable, it's also irresistible as in 'lie back and enjoy it'. You have a good point there. One of the insidious methods of NLP is time distortion. The brainwashing victim is encouraged to think the time is not now, but in the future. Like an example of this is when applying for a job the boss makes the decision, and at the interview if you start chatting to him as if he had already given you the job then that is time distortion. You make him imagine the now is the future when he has already done what he is deciding. So applying that to immigration would be kind of like saying we're already a multicultural society when no one has even voted for it. If you watch carefully you will see these NLP techniques used time and time again. There's a a whole set of different tricks. Time distortion is but one of them. It's how the cretins rule and keep the proles in their place. They laugh at how easy it is.
|
|
|
Post by aristaeus on Oct 21, 2024 13:20:38 GMT
Immigration is something to be managed, not something that you're "for" or "against". Western leftie liberal mindset ^ If you are against immigration in principle then you are a racist and far right . The only country I can think of that has no immigration is North Korea.
|
|