|
|
Post by Dogburger on Oct 13, 2024 15:40:10 GMT
Countries in many regions of today's world are the results of immigration — Africa, the Americas, Asia and Australasia are prime examples — and much of it caused by European colonisation, expansion, and immigration. Even the current forms of Bangladesh, India and Pakistan were formed by mass migrations orchestrated by European powers. I reckon that, by contrast, Britain has escaped relatively lightly the oppression and subjugation by foreign interests, that it and other European countries put on others... The difference being when Europe and the UK in particular colonised the world we gave them education , infrastructure ,railways , hospitals ,the rule of law in fact we gave them everything they needed to form decent societies . Over time most of them have fucked it up . Now they come here in their masses and over time they will fuck ours up as well .We haven't escaped at all ,we should be fighting for our lives instead of complacently allowing our government to allow it |
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on Oct 14, 2024 14:37:23 GMT
Britain saved India from domination by the Mughals (Islamic) after the independence distrust between the groups caused the breakup, nothing to do with Britain they wanted us to stay out of it.
In the '40s we invited thousands from India to work in textiles to undercut other markets yet this failed, no democratic decision on this, just a big government decision. Immigrants later let in as Brit workers wanted higher pay, that worked well just look at train drivers. If by wanting us to stay out of it, you mean the indigenous population of the subcontinent, that's probably true.
Of you wish to refer to Britain's specific activities, disclosing the ethnic cleansing (actually, almost complete eradication) of the indigenous people of Tasmania in the first part of the 19th century would be a place to begin...
I think you need to expand on Tasmania, I have read a conspiracy story on this a few years back yet don't think it was Britain's doing yet Aussie settlers. If this is the same case these were not aborigines yet a semi advanced society. |
|
