|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 4, 2024 16:47:10 GMT
Yep, that’s what I now recognise to be your trademark response when all of your offensive bile has failed to work and has dried up, leaving you with no other response at your disposal. What offensive bile? We all know your concerns for that poor womans plight is faux. You would rather stand up for the arsehole who carried out that hideus crime.... That offensive bile for starters. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 4, 2024 16:48:54 GMT
We all know the concerns of the lefties are faux.... There’s just a little example of the unprovoked childish derogatory comments that you insist on spewing out ad nauseam on this forum. You could never be accused of dispensing pearls of wisdom, could you? Oh the Irony....But hey anything rather than debate the topic. You were the one who started the personal attacks by accusing me and Red of putiing that poor womans plight secondary. Why the fuck do you think Red started the OP or are you really that nieve and transparent? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 4, 2024 16:49:58 GMT
There’s just a little example of the unprovoked childish derogatory comments that you insist on spewing out ad nauseam on this forum. You could never be accused of dispensing pearls of wisdom, could you? Wow! See2 Mk3.  The lefties echo....LOL.. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 4, 2024 16:50:45 GMT
What offensive bile? We all know your concerns for that poor womans plight is faux. You would rather stand up for the arsehole who carried out that hideus crime.... That offensive bile for starters. Nothing offensive there..... |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 4, 2024 16:53:44 GMT
As I said before, you have zero self-awareness. Every other post from you is an attack or a childish derogatory comment about “lefties” no matter how balanced and measured the comment you are responding to if, indeed, you are even responding to a comment and not just launching an unprovoked outburst for no apparent reason. Ad hom irrelevance. I did not accuse you of not caring about that poor woman. However, given that you have indicated that your first thought when you heard the story was to think ‘ illegal immigrant” rather than immediately and overwhelmingly think, as any half-decent person would, of the horror that poor woman had to endure, then shame on you. And if you take that personally then that’s great - because you absolutely should! So you think that examination of cause and effect is incorrect. Rubbish. I imagine that the examination of cause and effect is often valuable. However, I know that anyone whose first thought, when hearing about this poor woman’s terrible ordeal, is to think “ illegal immigrant” is worthy of nothing but our deepest contempt. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 4, 2024 16:59:10 GMT
Ad hom irrelevance. So you think that examination of cause and effect is incorrect. Rubbish. I imagine that the examination of cause and effect is often valuable. However, I know that anyone whose first thought, when hearing about this poor woman’s terrible ordeal, is to think “ illegal immigrant” is worthy of nothing but our deepest contempt. Oh so we add clairvoyancy now to yur skills matrix? You havent got a fucking clue what mine or Reds first thoughts were...Seems that you like to do your hero steve's act. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 4, 2024 17:11:15 GMT
There’s just a little example of the unprovoked childish derogatory comments that you insist on spewing out ad nauseam on this forum. You could never be accused of dispensing pearls of wisdom, could you? Oh the Irony....But hey anything rather than debate the topic. You were the one who started the personal attacks by accusing me and Red of putiing that poor womans plight secondary. Why the fuck do you think Red started the OP or are you really that nieve and transparent? You were the one who came on here and said, in response to my asking Red if “illegal immigrant“ was really the first thing that came into his head when he first read a report of this terrible incident, to say that it is “the first thing that comes into the head of the majority of those who can understand joined up thinking.... “. I am accusing you of nothing; you have made it pretty clear what you first thought - which is shameful. I assume that Red came on to launch yet another one of his many anti-immigrant attacks. I assume this because the potential immigrant status of the accusedand a.potential cover up of this information by the authorities was the thrust of his post. For him, or anyone else, to do so on the back of the report in the OP, was also shameful - particularly as he did not even know the resident status of the accused. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 4, 2024 17:14:56 GMT
I imagine that the examination of cause and effect is often valuable. However, I know that anyone whose first thought, when hearing about this poor woman’s terrible ordeal, is to think “ illegal immigrant” is worthy of nothing but our deepest contempt. Oh so we add clairvoyancy now to yur skills matrix? You havent got a fucking clue what mine or Reds first thoughts were...Seems that you like to do your hero steve's act. I know what yours were because you told us when you said, in response to my post asking Red if “illegal immigrant” was really the first thought to go through his head when hearing about this terrible incident for the first time that “It's the first thing that comes into the head of the majority of those who can understand joined up thinking....”. BTW - Steve can hardly be my hero as I have no idea who Steve is. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 4, 2024 17:22:45 GMT
That offensive bile for starters. Nothing offensive there..... I am on the receiving end of your comment and, as any reasonable person would, I find it highly offensive - just as you know, despite your childish pretence to the contrary, that what you said is, and was intended to be, highly offensive. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 4, 2024 17:42:56 GMT
So clearly the ones who pointed out the fact that Stephen Lawrence’s killers were white are racist . Is it racist to point out racists who murder others simply because of the colour of their skin? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 4, 2024 17:50:16 GMT
So clearly the ones who pointed out the fact that Stephen Lawrence’s killers were white are racist . Is it racist to point out racists who murder others simply because of the colour of their skin? Me ..Is it racist to comment on the perpetrators ethnic group ? You..Not necessarily. However it is racist to do so for some ethnic groups but not others. Why do you ask? We know now that you think commenting on white ethnic groups but not that Mohamed Iidow' was an illegal immigrant or his ethnic group. You do realise that this is a racist position dont you ? |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 4, 2024 17:58:34 GMT
Is it racist to point out racists who murder others simply because of the colour of their skin? Me ..Is it racist to comment on the perpetrators ethnic group ? You..Not necessarily. However it is racist to do so for some ethnic groups but not others. Why do you ask? We know now that you think commenting on white ethnic groups but not that Mohamed Iidow' was an illegal immigrant or his ethnic group. You do realise that this is a racist position dont you “We know now that you think commenting on white ethnic groups but not that Mohamed Iidow' was an illegal immigrant or his ethnic group.” This doesn’t make sense. I think something must have dropped off what you were intending to say. Can you tidy it up so that I can see what your point is. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 4, 2024 17:59:39 GMT
Ad hom irrelevance. So you think that examination of cause and effect is incorrect. Rubbish. I imagine that the examination of cause and effect is often valuable. However, I know that anyone whose first thought, when hearing about this poor woman’s terrible ordeal, is to think “ illegal immigrant” is worthy of nothing but our deepest contempt. Okay, See2 Mk3.
So subjective opinion is your only argument.
Nope...
|
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 4, 2024 18:02:56 GMT
I imagine that the examination of cause and effect is often valuable. However, I know that anyone whose first thought, when hearing about this poor woman’s terrible ordeal, is to think “ illegal immigrant” is worthy of nothing but our deepest contempt. Okay, See2 Mk3.
So subjective opinion is your only argument.
Nope...
I don’t know if subjective opinion is my only argument; in fact, I am not even making an argument . I am just stating that anyone whose first thought, when hearing about this poor woman’s terrible ordeal, is to think “ illegal immigrant” is worthy of nothing but our deepest contempt |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 4, 2024 18:04:31 GMT
Me ..Is it racist to comment on the perpetrators ethnic group ? You..Not necessarily. However it is racist to do so for some ethnic groups but not others. Why do you ask? We know now that you think commenting on white ethnic groups but not that Mohamed Iidow' was an illegal immigrant or his ethnic group. You do realise that this is a racist position dont you “We know now that you think commenting on white ethnic groups but not that Mohamed Iidow' was an illegal immigrant or his ethnic group.” This doesn’t make sense. I think something must have dropped off what you were intending to say. Can you tidy it up so that I can see what your point is. We know now that you think commenting on white ethnic groups …when they murder ,is justified … but not that Mohamed Iidow' was an illegal immigrant or his ethnic group. Apologies . |
|
