Mum of three, raped to death...

Bentley,

Here’s my belated reply to your post from a day or two ago, as promised. Sorry again for the delay.

I don’t follow how you reach your conclusion that I “think commenting on white ethnic groups …when they murder ,is justified … but not that Mohamed Iidow' was an illegal immigrant or his ethnic group” but however you arrive at that conclusion, it is not accurate.

Nor am I sure if you mean racist or racially motivated when you say “ justified” but I am going to assume that is the case because you take what you think I believe about these 2 separate matters, juxtapose them along side each other, and conclude that my position is racist.

Commenting on white ethnic groups when they murder is neither racist nor not racist in itself. That depends upon a couple of factors that I can think of ( although there might be more but this should make my principles clear enough) I.e.

1. Would the same people who choose to comment still have chosen to do so, and to do so in the same way, on non-white ethnic groups when they murder? If not, then their behaviour is racially motivated, as is the behaviour of people who choose not to comment on white ethnic groups when they murder but to comment on other ethnic groups when they do.

2. Was the killing itself potentially racially motivated I. e. was the victim from a different ethnic group than the ethnic group of the killers. If so, then commenting on the killing of a member of one ethnic group by members of another ethnic group is not racially motivated unless those who choose to comment or  not to comment do so selectively, depending upon the ethnic groups involved, in which case it is racially motivated in my view.

Commenting on Mohamed Iidow’s ethnic group and on him possibly being an illegal immigrant was not, in itself, racially motivate. The acid test, just like the white killer gang above, is would those who behaved as they did have behaved in exactly the same way irrespective of the accused’s ethnic group ( more accurately, in this case, the ethnic association of the accused's name)? So would Red have behaved just as he did, and put up that shocking OP on here, if the accused’s name had been Tommy Robinson, and would those whose first reaction to hearing of this attack still have been to think “illegal immigrant” rather than of what horror this poor woman might have gone through. In fact, would they have ever considered the residency status of the accused at all?  If not, and we surely all accept that they would not, then their behaviour and reactions were motivated by racial and/or anti-immigrant tendencies, in my view.

So, juxtapositioning my thinking on these two issue as you have done, is my position racist as you claim? I don’t think so because the principle behind my thinking is not racist or racially motivated and the same principle is applied to both issues.

Said it before, immigration without integration is invasion.

The link I provided in the OP clearly states:

Mum-of-three 'raped repeatedly until she died'... [By some low life peice of filth called Mohamed Iidow]

I assume you think the headline is 'offensive'? Perhaps you're from the left wing school of thought that says any bad news story that involves anyone who 'maybe' an illegal immigrant a refugee, should be hidden from the public. Well, I tend to disagree, and I don't give a toss about left wing feelings.

And I cant help noticing that as horrific as this story undoubtedly is, you show no sympathy for the victim whatsoever, and no anger for the accused. Your entire contribution to the discussion is criticism of me for having the temerity to mention it. 

Well done you, how very virtuous.