|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 30, 2024 20:17:25 GMT
What's that got to do with a child identifying as a wolf? Its very obviously a tangential comment. Have you run out of straws to grab? The word you're looking for is "Irrelevant". |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 30, 2024 20:19:14 GMT
LOL! Too true.  Are you really as daft as the poster you replied to? LOL Can you define "Far Right" yet? Or "Procreation"? Or indeed evidence any of your arguments?
(That's a rhetorical question btw - get someone to explain what that is).  |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Sept 30, 2024 20:21:28 GMT
Of course it doesn't. What has procreation got to do with men in dresses? Procreation has got absolutely nothing to do with trendy gender madness, although I'm sure left wing lunatics are working on it. Very little probably, but it is a fact that human procreation is not perfect, therefore the outcomes are not always perfect. You will be unsurprised that I disagree. The results of my parents procreation was, indeed is, perfection.  |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Sept 30, 2024 20:30:35 GMT
Very little probably, but it is a fact that human procreation is not perfect, therefore the outcomes are not always perfect. But seriously, whether procreation is perfect or not is irrelevant. Procreation is necessary it's the only reason humanity exists. But here's a thought, I would dearly love to hear your question put to Dawkins. Not because I feel he would side with me, or anyone else, but because when it comes to questions like this, Dawkins is a god (lol). |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 30, 2024 20:37:43 GMT
Its very obviously a tangential comment. Have you run out of straws to grab? The word you're looking for is "Irrelevant". No its not, are you really as dumb as you seem intent to be seen as? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 30, 2024 20:40:45 GMT
Very little probably, but it is a fact that human procreation is not perfect, therefore the outcomes are not always perfect. But seriously, whether procreation is perfect or not is irrelevant. Procreation is necessary it's the only reason humanity exists. But here's a thought, I would dearly love to hear your question put to Dawkins. Not because I feel he would side with me, or anyone else, but because when it comes to questions like this, Dawkins is a god (lol). A 'god' on this matter is not due just yet, but the old gods are taking some punishment at the moment. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 30, 2024 20:43:05 GMT
Are you really as daft as the poster you replied to? LOL Can you define "Far Right" yet? Or "Procreation"? Or indeed evidence any of your arguments?
(That's a rhetorical question btw - get someone to explain what that is). Your projection shows that you think I'm as daft as yourself LOL |
|
