|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 30, 2024 19:25:33 GMT
Quite clearly Turing was not an idiot, but he was treated disgracefully by an ignorant establishment, some things never change. As I said above... ...We all have a gender, male or female. Whether hetrosexual or homosexual a male is still a male. Homosexuality has nothing to do with trendy gender ideology. And for the record, a man in a dress is not a woman, he is a man in a dress. In other words you reject the undeniable fact that human procreation is far from perfect. What's imperfect about it? Humans procreate. It involves a male and a female. No other form is possible. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 30, 2024 19:26:28 GMT
Exactly, but they do exist. And they prove that simple XX-XY thinking is flawed. No they don't. They prove that some people are mentally unwell, not that everyone else should go along with their delusion. Some probably are, that does not mean that all people who feel they are in the wrong body sexually are mentally unwell. It just means that your fixed opinion is unable to accept even the possibility you, not as an expert, could consider the probability of mixed hormonal differences in some people creating unexpected sexual differences. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Sept 30, 2024 19:26:33 GMT
Quite clearly Turing was not an idiot, but he was treated disgracefully by an ignorant establishment, some things never change. As I said above... ...We all have a gender, male or female. Whether hetrosexual or homosexual a male is still a male. Homosexuality has nothing to do with trendy gender ideology. And for the record, a man in a dress is not a woman, he is a man in a dress. In other words you reject the undeniable fact that human procreation is far from perfect. That doesn't make sense. Are you suggesting that animal procreation is perfect? |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Sept 30, 2024 19:28:09 GMT
In other words you reject the undeniable fact that human procreation is far from perfect. What's imperfect about it? Humans procreate. It involves a male and a female. No other form is possible. Yes quite so, a very fair point. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 30, 2024 19:28:31 GMT
In other words you reject the undeniable fact that human procreation is far from perfect. What's imperfect about it? Humans procreate. It involves a male and a female. No other form is possible. There are 'mistakes' made in human procreation, are you saying you do not know any? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 30, 2024 19:30:01 GMT
In other words you reject the undeniable fact that human procreation is far from perfect. That doesn't make sense. Are you suggesting that animal procreation is perfect? No, but your post backs up my comment. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 30, 2024 19:35:36 GMT
What's imperfect about it? Humans procreate. It involves a male and a female. No other form is possible. There are 'mistakes' made in human procreation, are you saying you do not know any? What's that got to do with a child identifying as a wolf? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 30, 2024 19:37:26 GMT
When human procreation works it’s as perfect as it needs to be .
It doesn’t refute that sexual anomalies should define all sexual identities or redefine the definition of male or female.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 30, 2024 19:39:22 GMT
When human procreation works it’s as perfect as it needs to be . It doesn’t refute that sexual anomalies should define all sexual identities or redefine the definition of male or female. Indeed. But as usual is confused and resorting to whataboutery.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 30, 2024 19:40:35 GMT
When human procreation works it’s as perfect as it needs to be . It doesn’t refute that sexual anomalies should define all sexual identities or redefine the definition of male or female. Indeed. But as usual is confused and resorting to whataboutery.
He is incapable of joined up thinking whilst telling everyone else that they are incapable of joined up thinking |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 30, 2024 19:47:04 GMT
Indeed. But as usual is confused and resorting to whataboutery.
He is incapable of joined up thinking whilst telling everyone else that they are incapable of joined up thinking LOL! Too true.  |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Sept 30, 2024 19:47:05 GMT
That doesn't make sense. Are you suggesting that animal procreation is perfect? No, but your post backs up my comment. Of course it doesn't. What has procreation got to do with men in dresses? Procreation has got absolutely nothing to do with trendy gender madness, although I'm sure left wing lunatics are working on it. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 30, 2024 20:10:21 GMT
There are 'mistakes' made in human procreation, are you saying you do not know any? What's that got to do with a child identifying as a wolf? Its very obviously a tangential comment. Have you run out of straws to grab? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 30, 2024 20:12:30 GMT
No, but your post backs up my comment. Of course it doesn't. What has procreation got to do with men in dresses? Procreation has got absolutely nothing to do with trendy gender madness, although I'm sure left wing lunatics are working on it. Very little probably, but it is a fact that human procreation is not perfect, therefore the outcomes are not always perfect. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 30, 2024 20:14:04 GMT
He is incapable of joined up thinking whilst telling everyone else that they are incapable of joined up thinking LOL! Too true. Are you really as daft as the poster you replied to? LOL |
|
