|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 17, 2024 20:08:58 GMT
Keir Starmer snubs Angela Rayner as she loses out in battle for huge mansionChancellor Rachel Reeves will get use of the much sought-after Dorneywood country house instead of the Deputy Prime Minister
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 17, 2024 20:09:27 GMT
Are you there see2?  |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 17, 2024 20:20:14 GMT
“ The mansion in Buckinghamshire is usually given to the deputy prime minister and was made famous by John Prescott in 2006, when he was pictured playing croquet.
It comes as Ms Rayner has been forced to deny she is the Deputy Prime Minister in name only, with Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds given greater responsibilities over workers' right reforms.”
lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 17, 2024 20:27:05 GMT
“ The mansion in Buckinghamshire is usually given to the deputy prime minister and was made famous by John Prescott in 2006, when he was pictured playing croquet. It comes as Ms Rayner has been forced to deny she is the Deputy Prime Minister in name only, with Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds given greater responsibilities over workers' right reforms.” lol. PS ... love the avatar. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 17, 2024 20:35:22 GMT
And the splits are forming already!
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 17, 2024 20:44:03 GMT
I guessed ‘two houses ‘ Rayner was the token oik . I never guessed that ‘ two tier ‘Starmer considered her an even lower oik than ‘ two Jags’ Prescott.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Sept 17, 2024 21:24:02 GMT
“ The mansion in Buckinghamshire is usually given to the deputy prime minister and was made famous by John Prescott in 2006, when he was pictured playing croquet." That is not exactly true - Dorneywood is traditionally given to the Chancellor, John Prescott only got it because Gordon Brown wasn't interested and the had to give it to someone. If the government do not use it it then goes to the Lord Mayor of London. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 17, 2024 21:27:07 GMT
Starmer didn’t give it to her because he thought she would keep coal in the bath and piss in the bidet .
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 17, 2024 22:47:37 GMT
Starmer didn’t give it to her because he thought she would keep coal in the bath and piss in the bidet . And it doesen't have a bike shed. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 17, 2024 23:04:02 GMT
And the splits are forming already! |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Sept 18, 2024 13:39:44 GMT
He consistently pushes Raynor out because she is more of a threat to him than the Tories.
Angela Raynor: ‘What right does a man who complains he can’t live on £150,000 a year and asks Tory donors to fund his luxury wallpaper habit have to lecture someone trying to survive on £80 a week?’
She is in touch with the people and has the backing of the Unions. Sleazy Starmer taking £20k+ for clothes and glasses, whilst freezing pensioners to death is way way out of touch lol.
I predict we will have 3 PMs in the next 10 years. Raynor will stab Starmer in the back within 12 months and become PM, go too far with the Socialism and fuck it up, and then Andy Burnham will come in as the unity candidate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 18, 2024 13:48:29 GMT
He consistently pushes Raynor out because she is more of a threat to him than the Tories. Angela Raynor: ‘What right does a man who complains he can’t live on £150,000 a year and asks Tory donors to fund his luxury wallpaper habit have to lecture someone trying to survive on £80 a week?’ She is in touch with the people and has the backing of the Unions. Sleazy Starmer taking £20k+ for clothes and glasses, whilst freezing pensioners to death is way way out of touch lol. I predict we will have 3 PMs in the next 10 years. Raynor will stab Starmer in the back within 12 months and become PM, go too far with the Socialism and fuck it up, and then Andy Burnham will come in as the unity candidate. Dickhead Starmer is doing all the unpleasant things right now, because he has a shelf life of no longer than 12 months, within 12 months vote of no confidence, change of leader, new Prime Minister, then the new leader can say how nasty Starmer was, but they aren't going to change any of his nast policies... you can see it coming a mile off. |
|
