|
Post by wapentake on Sept 25, 2024 19:46:41 GMT
Shouldn’t the questions be why any of them accept them instead of all the excuses we hear that it’s not a problem. The effects Johnson and Truss have had on the UK continue to be a problem. One of them was a liar, the other incompetent but at least one had the traits of the other. Before just understanding why they acted as they did, my view is that we should ensure it doesn’t happen again… Why are you focusing on Boris and truss do you find steamer beyond reproach?
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Sept 25, 2024 20:14:47 GMT
Before just understanding why they acted as they did, my view is that we should ensure it doesn’t happen again… Why are you focusing on Boris and truss do you find steamer beyond reproach? OK — although he’s outlasted Truss by some considerable margin, Starmer has not been driven from office by fears of a crashing economy. One hundred days used to be the judgment point for politicians gaining power before Truss explosive fuck up, now the electron microscopes appear to be trained on an income the moment they arrive. Already, work is underway to re-nationalise the railways, do away with on-shore wind generation restrictions, end no-fault evictions, end zero hours contracts, make house building compulsory — plus Aslef strikes have been settled. All since the elction! There is more to do. But with a large majority, and five years to get started, the future looks less bleak than with a fractured Tory administration sweeping all problems under the carpet…
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Sept 25, 2024 20:27:13 GMT
Why are you focusing on Boris and truss do you find steamer beyond reproach? OK — although he’s outlasted Truss by some considerable margin, Starmer has not been driven from office by fears of a crashing economy. One hundred days used to be the judgment point for politicians gaining power before Truss explosive fuck up, now the electron microscopes appear to be trained on an income the moment they arrive. Already, work is underway to re-nationalise the railways, do away with on-shore wind generation restrictions, end no-fault evictions, end zero hours contracts, make house building compulsory — plus Aslef strikes have been settled. All since the elction! There is more to do. But with a large majority, and five years to get started, the future looks less bleak than with a fractured Tory administration sweeping all problems under the carpet… That isn’t the point of this thread,what is and being looked at is politicians on the take. It has emerged Lord Ali gave more the penthouse was used by steamers son for somewhere quiet to swot for exams,was this yet another freebie?
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Sept 29, 2024 23:12:26 GMT
Why are you focusing on Boris and truss do you find steamer beyond reproach? OK — although he’s outlasted Truss by some considerable margin, Starmer has not been driven from office by fears of a crashing economy. One hundred days used to be the judgment point for politicians gaining power before Truss explosive fuck up, now the electron microscopes appear to be trained on an income the moment they arrive. Already, work is underway to re-nationalise the railways, do away with on-shore wind generation restrictions, end no-fault evictions, end zero hours contracts, make house building compulsory — plus Aslef strikes have been settled. All since the elction! There is more to do. But with a large majority, and five years to get started, the future looks less bleak than with a fractured Tory administration sweeping all problems under the carpet… Let me break it down for you. The PM (the Chancellor and the Deputy PM) have personally accepted PRIVATE gifts from the owner of a company that THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT accused of exploiting it's workers lol. What the fuck is Labour doing accepting donations from a company that uses massive amounts of agency staff to avoid worker's rights? What the fuck are they doing accepting clothes worth an average persons salary, and accepting free holidays?
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Oct 5, 2024 7:57:39 GMT
On the subject of politicians on the unrecorded take, I see Starmer's wife's benefactor handed a sum getting on for six figures to an islamic peer whom the expenses committee found had failed to declare rather a lot, and threw her out of the chamber saying she could not return until she repaid every penny
Up comes Alli the Fixer and immediately pays her half the amount she owes, saying there aren't enough Moslems in the house.
Given it's supposed to be haram to fuck about in the politics of a state, why are there ANY ??
|
|