|
Post by Bentley on Sept 15, 2024 14:04:00 GMT
So the answer is that it has nothing to do with it . It’s just a diversion from a dummy . You are calling yourself a dummy now. It was a reply to your post about Cambridge. For goodness sake, I can't hack much more of this stupidity. No I was calling you a dummy . You responded to a post that pointed out that Cambridge was a nest of communist spies at one point and produced a rather stupid lrftie politician ( hence the ‘ cast your net a bit wider ie Cambridge …dummy) by posting waffle about an obscure biological and Dirac who was a genius anyway. Any stupidity you are ‘ hacking ‘ is your own .
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Sept 15, 2024 14:20:43 GMT
You are calling yourself a dummy now. It was a reply to your post about Cambridge. For goodness sake, I can't hack much more of this stupidity. No I was calling you a dummy . You responded to a post that pointed out that Cambridge was a nest of communist spies at one point and produced a rather stupid lrftie politician ( hence the ‘ cast your net a bit wider ie Cambridge …dummy) by posting waffle about an obscure biological and Dirac who was a genius anyway. Any stupidity you are ‘ hacking ‘ is your own . You just didn't understand my points. I don't have anything to correct and believe my points were valid, but you need intelligence to connect the dots. I'm not going to babywalk you through it as I have tried before and it was hopeless. I'll sum up my point in simple terms.
1) Cambridge bears many similarities to Oxford 2) Cambridge is not as bad as Oxford regarding leftwing training. 3) Evidence is coming in that suggests Cambridge is falling as well.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 15, 2024 14:26:17 GMT
No I was calling you a dummy . You responded to a post that pointed out that Cambridge was a nest of communist spies at one point and produced a rather stupid lrftie politician ( hence the ‘ cast your net a bit wider ie Cambridge …dummy) by posting waffle about an obscure biological and Dirac who was a genius anyway. Any stupidity you are ‘ hacking ‘ is your own . You just didn't understand my points. I don't have anything to correct and believe my points were valid, but you need intelligence to connect the dots. I'm not going to babywalk you through it as I have tried before and it was hopeless. I'll sum up my point in simple terms.
1) Cambridge bears many similarities to Oxford 2) Cambridge is not as bad as Oxford regarding leftwing training. 3) Evidence is coming in that suggests Cambridge is falling as well.
And I’ll sum up my point in an even simpler term . None of that has anything to do with this post ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/post/269970/thread …..dummy.
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Sept 15, 2024 15:36:04 GMT
Any geniuses that currently shine in Oxford and Cambridge spires are overshadowed by a WOKE toxicity that is more evident in the leadership of Oxford than Cambridge, tbh … Oxford was forced by hidden forces to appointed a woman anarchist as Chancellor … who promptly replaced celebration of the Feast of St. George … with Ramadan. Yes, seriously! 🤯🤪😱☠️ Not a serious crime … but a sign wholesale anarchic destruction was bound to follow.
This level of idiocy has led the charge to trash and rewrite the history of past heroes … Yes, it’s a Leftist-manipulated training camp … imported dumbness from Democratic/Zionist manipulations … but you have to get to the hub of the Religious Factions destroying our Institutions before you can pin point how to solve the problem … and restore common sense and excellence in Academia.
Track down the hidden forces destroying UK Education and Universities … and ruthlessly destroy them.
Politics has replaced study and pursuit of serious excellence … in all fields … and these anarchists need to be ‘shown the door’ … and ‘booted firmly in the gutter’ … and their Philistine hides given a good whipping .. for even considering ‘politics’ is a subject that should dominate in Academia … when it is the preserve of scoundrels and mafias … who naturally dominate RELIGION.
It’s time political activities were relegated to ‘off campus’ and anyone with a sniff of political bias … should be consigned to non-Administrative roles only … and politicians and religions should never have any influence or appointment powers over our precious education system … now left in RUINS by their INTERFERENCE.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Sept 15, 2024 15:46:08 GMT
Any geniuses that currently shine in Oxford and Cambridge spires are overshadowed by a WOKE toxicity that is more evident in the leadership of Oxford than Cambridge, tbh … Oxford was forced by hidden forces to appointed a woman anarchist as Chancellor … who promptly replaced celebration of the Feast of St. George … with Ramadan. Yes, seriously! 🤯🤪😱☠️ Not a serious crime … but a sign wholesale anarchic destruction was bound to follow. This level of idiocy has led the charge to trash and rewrite the history of past heroes … Yes, it’s a Leftist-manipulated training camp … imported dumbness from Democratic/Zionist manipulations … but you have to get to the hub of the Religious Factions destroying our Institutions before you can pin point how to solve the problem … and restore common sense and excellence in Academia. Track down the hidden forces destroying UK Education and Universities … and ruthlessly destroy them. Politics has replaced study and pursuit of serious excellence … in all fields … and these anarchists need to be ‘shown the door’ … and ‘booted firmly in the gutter’ … and their Philistine hides given a good whipping .. for even considering ‘politics’ is a subject that should dominate in Academia … when it is the preserve of scoundrels and mafias … who naturally dominate RELIGION. You know Dirac managed to figure out the mathematics to one of the most complicated puzzles in the physics of how reality really works. It makes Einstein's theories look simple by comparison, and I'm not kidding. Probably the only equal he has is Richard Feynman who figured out the next giant leap, but he built on Dirac's work. It goes from one extreme to the extreme mental patient, like the Extinction Rebellion crowd, which few know had the backing of a group at the London universities. London has a few dodgy ones. LSE is one and UCL is another.
How these university dons can just sit there and watch the destruction of their institution is rather unfathomable. Academia is to a nation what a heart is to the body. If you wan to kill a nation, go for the academics.
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Sept 16, 2024 8:11:59 GMT
I went to Cambridge and got a degree in physics. I was expecting to be surrounded by super-intelligent people and was a bit apprehensive, but to my relief it wasn't like that. No doubt there are some highly exceptional people there, but there are at other universities too - and also there are highly exceptional people who never went to any university at all.
But both Oxford and Cambridge are very Left wing - all of the fellows, tutors etc are solid Lefties. Unfortunately I think this is also true of the "red bricks" and of the teaching profession generally. I don't know why.
As for Dianne Abbot she was part of some kind of "affirmative action" drive to preferentially accept Blacks. David Lammy also has an exemplary educational record - University of London and Harvard. Yet both of them are very, very stupid. If they'd been white they would never have got into these institutions.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Sept 16, 2024 8:24:03 GMT
Biggest problem in our universities is cancel culture. Abolish all the no platforming bollocks. Cut University places but make the tuition of STEM subjects free.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Sept 16, 2024 11:17:46 GMT
I went to Cambridge and got a degree in physics. I was expecting to be surrounded by super-intelligent people and was a bit apprehensive, but to my relief it wasn't like that. No doubt there are some highly exceptional people there, but there are at other universities too - and also there are highly exceptional people who never went to any university at all. But both Oxford and Cambridge are very Left wing - all of the fellows, tutors etc are solid Lefties. Unfortunately I think this is also true of the "red bricks" and of the teaching profession generally. I don't know why. As for Dianne Abbot she was part of some kind of "affirmative action" drive to preferentially accept Blacks. David Lammy also has an exemplary educational record - University of London and Harvard. Yet both of them are very, very stupid. If they'd been white they would never have got into these institutions. That's interesting. It's good to hear some first-hand experience. I spent a bit of time being introduced to the Balliol crowd who were friends with my girlfriend. I met someone doing physics as I was, and someone doing the infamous PPE. They were all at least not stupid and you could have a conversation with any about anything and they would have a clue, but I never saw any geniuses while I was there. The most intelligent person I knew was at Manchester and he was a right oddball. What was noticeable in the Oxford crowd was they were very civilised, very polite and friendly and very relaxed. I was getting the impression they were more selected on their personal traits than their academic abilities, as per they were good communicators. If there is one thing that singles out Oxford it is they all have a certain way of presenting themselves that fits the idea of respectability. Think how Johnson behaved. It's a kind of mask in some cases. I'm talking mid 80s here. I suspect things have changed drastically since them. I think I saw the old Oxford, not the Oxford that produced the specimen I saw in the video I described in the OP. It was such BS that I refuse to syndicate it!
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Sept 17, 2024 6:16:09 GMT
I think the biggest difference between students is not between Oxbridge and the rest but between those who were public school educated and the rest. The public school guys were all super self confident. It's no surprise that so many end up as politicians or civil servants - jobs where you don't really have to do anything. You just have to be able to bullshit credibly.
|
|