ginnyg2
Full Member
Don't blame me - I voted for someone else.
Posts: 402
|
Post by ginnyg2 on Sept 5, 2024 9:55:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Sept 5, 2024 14:22:58 GMT
I think its a good idea at least its not for just Ukrainian refugees.
The homeless families are also being put up .
Its a win win situation has far im concerned
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Sept 5, 2024 14:28:57 GMT
So we're putting illegals in hotels, and homeless British people in containers. I wonder, when will the riots start?.. The 'container village'...  |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 5, 2024 14:42:10 GMT
I think its a good idea at least its not for just Ukrainian refugees. The homeless families are also being put up . Its a win win situation has far im concerned “At least it’s not for just Ukrainian refugees” …ffs. How the fuck is making British people compete with immigrants a win win situation ? This is just that but with some window dressing . |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 5, 2024 15:35:47 GMT
Given the council is using the temporary accommodation it is clear they don't have the capacity to meet the demand. So, would you rather "native homeless" remained homeless, rather than share accommodation with Ukrainians? All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 5, 2024 15:40:43 GMT
I think its a good idea at least its not for just Ukrainian refugees. The homeless families are also being put up . Its a win win situation has far im concerned “At least it’s not for just Ukrainian refugees” …ffs. How the fuck is making British people compete with immigrants a win win situation ? This is just that but with some window dressing . You'd rather they remain homeless? I mean I think we can assume the Ukrainians are genuine refugees, so we'd have a legal obligation to house them, even if net immigration were zero. The council clearly does not have sufficient capacity, after decades of allowing an essential service like a housing being left to profiteering vagaries of "the market". So surely using the temp accommodation to help British homeless is a good thing. How could anyone see it as a bad thing? All The Best |
|
ginnyg2
Full Member
Don't blame me - I voted for someone else.
Posts: 402
|
Post by ginnyg2 on Sept 5, 2024 16:17:34 GMT
Given the council is using the temporary accommodation it is clear they don't have the capacity to meet the demand. So, would you rather "native homeless" remained homeless, rather than share accommodation with Ukrainians? All The Best You don't get it do you. Or are you being deliberately obtuse as usual? Native homeless should have priority - in any country that put its own citizens first that is. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 5, 2024 16:22:50 GMT
“At least it’s not for just Ukrainian refugees” …ffs. How the fuck is making British people compete with immigrants a win win situation ? This is just that but with some window dressing . You'd rather they remain homeless? I mean I think we can assume the Ukrainians are genuine refugees, so we'd have a legal obligation to house them, even if net immigration were zero. The council clearly does not have sufficient capacity, after decades of allowing an essential service like a housing being left to profiteering vagaries of "the market". So surely using the temp accommodation to help British homeless is a good thing. How could anyone see it as a bad thing? All The Best British people competing with foreigners for homes is not a win win situation. Just address your waffle to that simple point . It has nothing to do with me ‘ rather them remain homeless’. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 5, 2024 16:52:19 GMT
Given the council is using the temporary accommodation it is clear they don't have the capacity to meet the demand. So, would you rather "native homeless" remained homeless, rather than share accommodation with Ukrainians? All The Best You don't get it do you. Or are you being deliberately obtuse as usual? Native homeless should have priority - in any country that put its own citizens first that is. I agree. But given we have a legal duty to house genuine refugees, and no such legal duty to our own citizens (several Governments have resisted attempts to make housing a human right) , the Council seems to be stuck between a rick and a hard place. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Sept 5, 2024 17:04:48 GMT
Given the council is using the temporary accommodation it is clear they don't have the capacity to meet the demand. So, would you rather "native homeless" remained homeless, rather than share accommodation with Ukrainians? All The Best You don't get it do you. Or are you being deliberately obtuse as usual? Native homeless should have priority - in any country that put its own citizens first that is. Absolutely and let there be no doubt. |
|
ginnyg2
Full Member
Don't blame me - I voted for someone else.
Posts: 402
|
Post by ginnyg2 on Sept 6, 2024 12:24:13 GMT
You don't get it do you. Or are you being deliberately obtuse as usual? Native homeless should have priority - in any country that put its own citizens first that is. I agree. But given we have a legal duty to house genuine refugees, and no such legal duty to our own citizens (several Governments have resisted attempts to make housing a human right) , the Council seems to be stuck between a rick and a hard place. All The Best Glad we agree on something. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Sept 6, 2024 17:37:01 GMT
The refusal to answer tells you all you need to know..
|
|
