|
Idiots
Aug 18, 2024 1:49:03 GMT
Post by morayloon on Aug 18, 2024 1:49:03 GMT
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 18, 2024 5:55:55 GMT
Post by happyjack on Aug 18, 2024 5:55:55 GMT
Mr Robertson only acted as he did after receiving approval to do so from the FM and (presumably) his cabinet. Did they all therefore totally misjudge the mood of Scottish opinion and should they all be sacked or resign?
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 18, 2024 7:19:58 GMT
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Aug 18, 2024 7:19:58 GMT
This is what a 'genocide' is:
Like usual, inventing political words to look after Jewish interests.
He has his own wiki page.
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 18, 2024 11:26:31 GMT
Post by morayloon on Aug 18, 2024 11:26:31 GMT
Mr Robertson only acted as he did after receiving approval to do so from the FM and (presumably) his cabinet. Did they all therefore totally misjudge the mood of Scottish opinion and should they all be sacked or resign? Actually, Swinney's defence of Robertson shows that he too misjudged how Robertson's activity would go down with the membership and the public in general.
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 18, 2024 11:31:22 GMT
Post by morayloon on Aug 18, 2024 11:31:22 GMT
This is what a 'genocide' is:
Like usual, inventing political words to look after Jewish interests.
He has his own wiki page.
The Zionists can't (don't want to) see that what they are doing is not dissimilar to how their forebearers were treated.
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 18, 2024 11:48:26 GMT
Post by happyjack on Aug 18, 2024 11:48:26 GMT
Mr Robertson only acted as he did after receiving approval to do so from the FM and (presumably) his cabinet. Did they all therefore totally misjudge the mood of Scottish opinion and should they all be sacked or resign? Actually, Swinney's defence of Robertson shows that he too misjudged how Robertson's activity would go down with the membership and the public in general. So, did Mr Swinney just misjudge the mood of Scottish opinion or did he totally misjudge it as you say Mr Robertson did - and should Mr Swinney sack himself and resign?
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 18, 2024 12:00:34 GMT
Post by thomas on Aug 18, 2024 12:00:34 GMT
Actually, Swinney's defence of Robertson shows that he too misjudged how Robertson's activity would go down with the membership and the public in general. So, did Mr Swinney just misjudge the mood of Scottish opinion or did he totally misjudge it as you say Mr Robertson did - and should Mr Swinney sack himself and resign? has keir starmer misjudged the mood of his own party over events in the Middle East , and the wider uk , and if so should he resign? Whats your opinion happy regarding events in the Middle East? Just 14% of Britons - and 22% of 2019 Labour voters - say Keir Starmer is handling the party's policy on Gaza well
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 18, 2024 12:11:01 GMT
Post by happyjack on Aug 18, 2024 12:11:01 GMT
If you are talking about the current ongoing Gaza situation then my opinion about events is broadly in line with those of the vast majority of my fellow citizens throughout the country as, I believe, are Sir Kier’s and his party’s. The sooner that the Gaza carnage is brought to an end and those responsible for committing atrocities are held to account, the better.
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 18, 2024 14:08:32 GMT
Post by Bentley on Aug 18, 2024 14:08:32 GMT
The word ‘ genocide ‘ seems to mean whatever the lefties want it to mean , as is Racist and quite a few ‘ phobes.
In 1948, the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group". I suppose the problem comes with the definition of “ or in part”.
Maybe Hamas should just give up the hostages ,and stop using human shields .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Idiots
Aug 18, 2024 14:14:17 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2024 14:14:17 GMT
The word ‘ genocide ‘ seems to mean whatever the lefties want it to mean , as is Racist and quite a few ‘ phobes. In 1948, the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group". I suppose the problem comes with the definition of “ or in part”. Maybe Hamas should just give up the hostages ,and stop using human shields . If I were John Mason, as an MSP, I would think my right to free speech is being curtailed by a pro-Hamas party. Do the SNP have a history of anti-Semitism, like Labour?
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 18, 2024 14:20:00 GMT
Post by happyjack on Aug 18, 2024 14:20:00 GMT
No, they don’t, not to my knowledge at least; just an anti-English history (which is, of course, equally as offensive and unacceptable as anti -semitism) and some pro-nazi associations too, I believe.
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 18, 2024 19:56:45 GMT
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Aug 18, 2024 19:56:45 GMT
This is what a 'genocide' is:
Like usual, inventing political words to look after Jewish interests.
He has his own wiki page.
The Zionists can't (don't want to) see that what they are doing is not dissimilar to how their forebearers were treated. The irony of life is if you do the research, you often find the worst fascists are those that suffered badly as a child, often by fascist treatment. It is a recurring loop of evil, and what I think happened was the evil of the Nazis agaisnt the Jews created such hatred of Nazis in the minds of the Jew, that as they emigrated to the US and became powerful figures, they psychologically wanted to discharge all that evil in their mind onto others they think deserve it. They can't punish the ones that hurt them, so go after others. You can find the same patterns if you research the early life of mass murderers. The more deranged the killings the more you find the same sort of terror in the early upbringing, which nearly always involves a broken family. I was reading my own link earlier and again we see this lifelong ambition to right the wrongs, yet truthfully he would be the last person I would elect to create international law. He was not of balanced mind, like he was right out there (amongst the stars as Jim Morrison would say, right out on the parameter). This is what we call woke in 2024.
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 20, 2024 19:55:07 GMT
Post by morayloon on Aug 20, 2024 19:55:07 GMT
No, they don’t, not to my knowledge at least; just an anti-English history (which is, of course, equally as offensive and unacceptable as anti -semitism) and some pro-nazi associations too, I believe. Talking bullshit again!!! I have asked you many times, as I have other posters on this forum, to show how the SNP is anti-English. If it was anti-English, why are there so many English people in the Party? Why are there groups of English people supporting Independence? Please list some of this anti Englishness. Your previous attempts left a lot to be desired. But, of course, if you can't produce anything of substance, just say so!!! As for John Swinney, I don't care if he resigns. I am not a member of the SNP, so I have no say in the matter. Robertson has come out and said that, as the minister involved, it was his decision. Swinney and the Cabinet would have been informed, but the affair was created and carried out by Robertson.
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 21, 2024 0:46:33 GMT
Post by happyjack on Aug 21, 2024 0:46:33 GMT
There you go again kicking off with your offensive and abusive language. Are you still going to delude yourself that you are the injured party here ?
I have already provided you with an explanation and a list of behaviours that you have displayed on here that clearly demonstrate your anti-English attitudes. Just look for similar behaviours amongst any SNP types that you know or from any SNP member you chance to see in action and if you spot anything similar to what is on that list of behaviours then you will be looking at evidence of SNP anti-English behaviour.
If we needed any more evidence that you struggle with being able to read, process and understand (which we don’t because that is already well established) then you have just provided it in your response above because the question posed by the now departed and deleted forum member (and my answer to him that prompted your “Talking bullshit again” accusation) was not about the present day but about historical tendencies. Surely even you would not try to deny that there have been plenty examples of shameful unadulterated anti-English behaviour in the past from the SNP and its membership? The key difference between then and now is that they have learned to use coded terms such as Westminster, The UK, Tories, Toryland etc etc in lieu of England to mask their prejudices and to try to give them some plausible deniability - but in many cases “England“ is still what they mean no matter what euphemism they have trained themselves to use. You only have to go on to Scotland’s Indy daily and read some of the offensive comments regularly posted on there by ScotNat subscribers, many of whom declare their SNP credentials, to see routine and clear anti-English sentiment on display. Or, if you find yourself in the right place at the right time, usually late on Friday or Saturday nights when a few beers too many have loosened inhibitions, it is not uncommon to hear blatant anti-English dialogue from SNP and Indy types in general.
|
|
|
Idiots
Aug 21, 2024 9:47:34 GMT
Post by happyjack on Aug 21, 2024 9:47:34 GMT
Following on from my previous post, I suspect that at least part of the problem with you is that you are surrounded by other Indy zealots much of the time i.e. people who, like you, demonstrate anti-English behaviour in such a routine and everyday manner that you simply don’t recognise anti-Englishness in yourself or in others because you have become so desensitised to it. By way of example, here is a link to a paper full of what any half-decent person would instantly recognise as outrageous examples of anti-English racism. Have a look through it, try to be honest, and admit to yourself (if not to us) just how bad or otherwise you truly believe all of these examples really are. If you don’t genuinely find every one of them disgusting then you have got even more of a problem than I thought. And, of course, it is not only extreme examples such as those in the link that constitute anti-English behaviour; the vast majority of anti-English behaviour out there is much more nuanced and much less blatant, if only because indy types now employ euphemisms and coded language for “England” and the “English”, but that doesn’t make it any less anti-English or mean that those who employ these euphemisms are not anti-English bigots. medium.com/@johnkelly_17973/anti-english-rhetoric-among-nationalist-circles-ca0ea7c7163c
|
|