|
Post by sandypine on Aug 15, 2024 7:50:56 GMT
Junk Temperature Measuring Network Means the Met Office Cannot Prove There’s Been a “Dramatic Increase” in Temperature dailysceptic.org/2024/08/13/junk-measuring-network-means-the-met-office-cannot-prove-dramatic-increase-in-temperature-extremes-and-records/Earlier this month, the Met Office claimed that climate change was causing a “dramatic increase in the frequency of temperature extremes and number of temperature records in the U.K.”. Given what we now know from recent freedom of information (FOI) revelations about the state of its ‘junk’ nationwide temperature measuring network, it is difficult to see how the Met Office can publish such a statement and keep a straight face. The claims were the headline findings in the operation’s latest state of the U.K. climate report and are said to be based on “observations from the U.K.’s network of weather stations, using data extending back to the 19th Century to provide long term context”. That would be the network where nearly eight out of 10 stations are deemed by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) to have ‘uncertainties’ – i.e., potential errors – between 2-5°C. The same junk stations that provide ‘record’ daily temperatures often in the same places, such as the urban heat furnace that is Heathrow airport. The same junk measurements that the Met Office uses to claim collated measurements down to one hundredth of a degree centigrade. Read on
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Aug 16, 2024 7:05:41 GMT
The simple fact that there are many more weather stations in the network means that you're more likely to find record temperatures. And the fact that the weather stations are far better at recording transient temperature highs or lows also adds to the probability of finding a record temperature - as does the fact that the weather stations are put in locations that are increasingly urbanised.
The record temperature last year in Lincolnshire (IIRC) of 40.3C is a good example of this. It was taken on an RAF runway during the take off of an F15. This is plainly not a representative measurement and would never have been allowed in the past.
We'd better watch out though. This kind of talk is probably called "misinformation" by Starmer.
|
|