Racism, too difficult a definition.

I did not say it was I said those who wish to smash racism (and fascism which is another issue) are unable to define what they wish to smash. I know exactly what racism is and accept the definition, what I cannot understand is on what basis it is carefully coddled in law and in some aspects of life both legally and socially acceptable and for some others it is taken as a moral issue that they must obey on pain of excommunication from polite society and employment. These are generally separated on a left/right basis. In broad terms most on the right know what racism is and cannot accept that racism  is being employed as a tool against them and that issue comes from the left. In your own case you call out racism but grudgingly accept racism in law and in academia. The whole issue makes no sense either morally or democratically.

Christianity is welcome in China and the Chinese represent the world's largest Christian population. It was like this during the days of the Qing where the 12 heads of the Summer Palace were sculptured by Christian missionaries. They were regarded as very special. The only time it was controlled was during the ten years of the cultural revolution. Falun Gong though is a cult. I can understand them banning it and I think I would have banned it if I were in charge. You should not band these facts about willy nilly. It is grossly misleading.