|
|
Post by Rebirth on Sept 13, 2024 16:18:14 GMT
You are lying and accusing the forum's moderator of being an idiot for posting a picture that accurately reflects the extreme demographic changes that resulted from the last Labour government. Just more silly opinion, ^^^ but this time compounded by lies about me. The moderator posted a picture along with an insinuation that inferred a lie. He knows what he did, you missed it because you appeared to be far more interested in lying about me. You're still lying. He posted a picture of Bradford, which was almost majority Muslim before Sunak's more recent immigration wave. Why do you object to that? You got something to hide? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 13, 2024 16:26:17 GMT
Only just over half of the people in Bradford are white British .
There’s going to be plenty of ‘spot the white man’ arenas in Bradford.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 13, 2024 16:32:29 GMT
Just more silly opinion, ^^^ but this time compounded by lies about me. The moderator posted a picture along with an insinuation that inferred a lie. He knows what he did, you missed it because you appeared to be far more interested in lying about me. You're still lying. He posted a picture of Bradford, which was almost majority Muslim before Sunak's more recent immigration wave. Why do you object to that? You got something to hide? Nope, YOU are the liar, making up lies to try to imply that you know what you are posting about. The moderator posted a very selective picture, i.e. it showed what appeared to be a meeting of Muslims attending an open air meeting. His comment of the picture went as follows. Andrewbrown posted To be fair we have quite a few vacuous posters on here who think Bradford is abroad. 🙃 The Moderator replied Why would they think that. Now see if you can actually add 2 and 2 together ^^ |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 13, 2024 16:34:45 GMT
You're still lying. He posted a picture of Bradford, which was almost majority Muslim before Sunak's more recent immigration wave. Why do you object to that? You got something to hide? Nope, YOU are the liar, making up lies to try to imply that you know what you are posting about. The moderator posted a very selective picture, i.e. it showed what appeared to be a meeting of Muslims attending an open air meeting. His comment of the picture went as follows. Andrewbrown posted To be fair we have quite a few vacuous posters on here who think Bradford is abroad. 🙃 The Moderator replied Why would they think that. Now see if you can actually ad 2 and 2 together ^^ Why didn’t you jump on Andrew first when he clearly made a false claim ? |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Sept 13, 2024 16:45:26 GMT
You're still lying. He posted a picture of Bradford, which was almost majority Muslim before Sunak's more recent immigration wave. Why do you object to that? You got something to hide? Nope, YOU are the liar, making up lies to try to imply that you know what you are posting about. The moderator posted a very selective picture, i.e. it showed what appeared to be a meeting of Muslims attending an open air meeting. His comment of the picture went as follows. Andrewbrown posted To be fair we have quite a few vacuous posters on here who think Bradford is abroad. 🙃 The Moderator replied Why would they think that. Now see if you can actually ad 2 and 2 together ^^ So if you pitch up in Bradford and see what is in the picture you will immediately believe that you are in England? Where do you think this is?  |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Sept 13, 2024 16:46:41 GMT
You're still lying. He posted a picture of Bradford, which was almost majority Muslim before Sunak's more recent immigration wave. Why do you object to that? You got something to hide? Nope, YOU are the liar, making up lies to try to imply that you know what you are posting about. The moderator posted a very selective picture, i.e. it showed what appeared to be a meeting of Muslims attending an open air meeting. His comment of the picture went as follows. Andrewbrown posted To be fair we have quite a few vacuous posters on here who think Bradford is abroad. 🙃 The Moderator replied Why would they think that. Now see if you can actually ad 2 and 2 together ^^ Again, you're still lying and objecting to reality and hard facts. The picture is real, the demographics are real and yet you object like somebody with something to hide. Don't tell me you're TTL's host. Going by the level of spamming you do it wouldn't surprise me. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Sept 13, 2024 17:15:07 GMT
That is Bradford though is it not, I have never been but if it is Bradford how is it misleading? Considering that less than one third of Bradfords population is either Asian or Asiian-British, the picture is obviously not an accurate illustration of Bradford. An accurate illustration would depict 61% of the people as been white Why would every picture have to be an accurate proportional representation of anything? A picture of Morris dancers would be indicative of England but not representative. So the picture is indicative of Bradford but not representative and perhaps that is the problem as the faces could be indicative now of almost anywhere. |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Sept 13, 2024 17:16:06 GMT
Nope, YOU are the liar, making up lies to try to imply that you know what you are posting about. The moderator posted a very selective picture, i.e. it showed what appeared to be a meeting of Muslims attending an open air meeting. His comment of the picture went as follows. Andrewbrown posted To be fair we have quite a few vacuous posters on here who think Bradford is abroad. 🙃 The Moderator replied Why would they think that. Now see if you can actually ad 2 and 2 together ^^ Again, you're still lying and objecting to reality and hard facts. The picture is real, the demographics are real and yet you object like somebody with something to hide. Don't tell me you're TTL's host. Going by the level of spamming you do it wouldn't surprise me. The last census told us that Bradford is a city which is 61% white So bearing that FACT in mind, how do you believe the picture accurately reflects the city of Bradford ? |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Sept 13, 2024 17:19:38 GMT
Considering that less than one third of Bradfords population is either Asian or Asiian-British, the picture is obviously not an accurate illustration of Bradford. An accurate illustration would depict 61% of the people as been white Why would every picture have to be an accurate proportional representation of anything? A picture of Morris dancers would be indicative of England but not representative. So the picture is indicative of Bradford but not representative and perhaps that is the problem as the faces could be indicative now of almost anywhere. Well thank you for admitting that the picture is not representative of Bradford, and for agreeing that it is a deliberate attempt at deception, the poster would almost certainly get a job for The Daily Mail. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 13, 2024 17:22:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Sept 13, 2024 17:24:22 GMT
Again, you're still lying and objecting to reality and hard facts. The picture is real, the demographics are real and yet you object like somebody with something to hide. Don't tell me you're TTL's host. Going by the level of spamming you do it wouldn't surprise me. The last census told us that Bradford is a city which is 61% white So bearing that FACT in mind, how do you believe the picture accurately reflects the city of Bradford ? Because it's a genuine picture. The demographics of Bradford has changed substantially thanks to mass-immigration within a couple of decades and is still rapidly changing. What matters, if you actually undertand Islam, is that Islam outweighed no religion and is very likely to be the most dominant religion in the area today. This is why your party prioritise Muslims over everyone else and rely on two-tier justice. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Sept 13, 2024 17:25:25 GMT
Why would every picture have to be an accurate proportional representation of anything? A picture of Morris dancers would be indicative of England but not representative. So the picture is indicative of Bradford but not representative and perhaps that is the problem as the faces could be indicative now of almost anywhere. Well thank you for admitting that the picture is not representative of Bradford, and for agreeing that it is a deliberate attempt at deception, the poster would almost certainly get a job for The Daily Mail. I did not agree the latter in fact I queried why being indicative of something is wrong. Representation is an impossible task now we have a host of many obscure identities and it is one picture. It was a point well made and it irritated the delicate as I am sure he would expect it would. |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Sept 13, 2024 17:40:16 GMT
The last census told us that Bradford is a city which is 61% white So bearing that FACT in mind, how do you believe the picture accurately reflects the city of Bradford ? Because it's a genuine picture. The demographics of Bradford has changed substantially thanks to mass-immigration within a couple of decades and is still rapidly changing. What matters, if you actually undertand Islam, is that Islam outweighed no religion and is very likely to be the most dominant religion in the area today. This is why your party prioritise Muslims over everyone else and rely on two-tier justice. When I refered to "the last census", I was of course refering to the census of 2021, just 3 years ago. The demographics of Bradford have not changed very much in three years You can argue as much as you want, but you are still wrong, and both you and the other posters are attempting to defend deception. If a photograph is to be representative of a particular city, then should it not depict that city in the light of reality, and not misrepresnt its population as anything other than an honest representation. The dishonest picture attempts to depict Bradford as been entirely Asian ... and yet you defend that deception, there s no way out of this, just accept its deception. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Sept 13, 2024 17:49:59 GMT
Because it's a genuine picture. The demographics of Bradford has changed substantially thanks to mass-immigration within a couple of decades and is still rapidly changing. What matters, if you actually undertand Islam, is that Islam outweighed no religion and is very likely to be the most dominant religion in the area today. This is why your party prioritise Muslims over everyone else and rely on two-tier justice. When I refered to "the last census", I was of course refering to the census of 2021, just 3 years ago. The demographics of Bradford have not changed very much in three years You can argue as much as you want, but you are still wrong, and both you and the other posters are attempting to defend deception. If a photograph is to be representative of a particular city, then should it not depict that city in the light of reality, and not misrepresnt its population as anything other than an honest representation. The dishonest picture attempts to depict Bradford as been entirely Asian ... and yet you defend that deception, there s no way out of this, just accept its deception. The picture highlights the fact that areas are practically entirely Asian and the last census was just shy of Bradford being majority Muslim. You see, in the real world humans are territorial and will conform to their niche and expand from there. Muslims especially since they're heavily tied to their Mosques which actually function as political and religious centres. Your party encouraged this and it was no accident, which is why your party rely on two-tier policing and two-tier justice. The attempts at deception is all you.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Sept 13, 2024 18:08:51 GMT
When I refered to "the last census", I was of course refering to the census of 2021, just 3 years ago. The demographics of Bradford have not changed very much in three years You can argue as much as you want, but you are still wrong, and both you and the other posters are attempting to defend deception. If a photograph is to be representative of a particular city, then should it not depict that city in the light of reality, and not misrepresnt its population as anything other than an honest representation. The dishonest picture attempts to depict Bradford as been entirely Asian ... and yet you defend that deception, there s no way out of this, just accept its deception. The picture highlights the fact that areas are practically entirely Asian and the last census was just shy of Bradford being majority Muslim. You see, in the real world humans are territorial and will conform to their niche and expand from there. Muslims especially since they're heavily tied to their Mosques which actually function as political and religious centres. Your party encouraged this and it was no accident, which is why your party rely on two-tier policing and two-tier justice. The attempts at deception is all you.
I wonder where you get your facts from, is it by any chance The Daily Mail ? Islam is the religion of 30% of the population of Bradford ( the entire city, not bits of it ) For Muslims to be "almost the majority religion" it would require close to 50% of the population to be Muslim, as it is Christianity remains the largest single religion in Bradford. I have been to Bradford, and I have been in the city centre at night time, a perfectly safe city, and during the day I have been in cafes where old ladies meet up to talk to each other in Polish, ladies who's families settled here after the Second Woeld War, and who's husbands fought in the British Army and flew in the RAF. Yes its a multi-cultural city, its a great place, the vast majority of people just get on fine |
|
