|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 18:01:41 GMT
Projection ( in bold ). Im bored now . Then piss of and give decent reasonable people a break. You should take your own advice and stop projecting. |
|
|
|
Post by aristaeus on Aug 23, 2024 7:26:34 GMT
None of this is a defence for your sympathy and support for Anders Breivik's actions. Saying he was right to murder all those kids is alarming. And another thing. If my wife was raped by an immigrant, I would hate the person who did it, not all immigrants. And I certainly wouldn't join a neo-nazi party. Wanting the DP for rape is stupid, which is why no one has been hanged for rape in almost 200 years. Again, no other party wanted to deal with the problem if islamic rapists. If they had, I might have joined them. It's a police matter, not a party matter. Rape is a crime. Still not clear what any of this has to do with your support of Anders Breivik, a neo-nazi terrorist who murdered dozens of children, and why you think 'he had the right idea'? |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Aug 24, 2024 13:26:22 GMT
No it wasn’t . You are posting your opinion as fact. A moronic opinion that Hitler was so stupid that he didn’t realise that invading other countries and genocide was not an extreme act and therefore he was an extremist . Your last line is classic projection from you .lol. You have posted YOUR opinion on what Hitler would be thinking and that is pure projection on your part. I have been posting his reactions as seen on film shown on TV, which indicate that he was so well pleased with his victories he repeated them over and over again. A stated opinion is not a projection, which you would know if you fully understood projection.
Bless Do you believe the films you've seen on TV? You know that Coronation Street and Eastenders are fiction, Mary Poppins and tinkerbelle couldn't really fly and that artistic licence is used in historical drama? |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Aug 24, 2024 13:28:28 GMT
Well let's face it, Labour thought they were being clever just sitting back and watching the Conservatives destroy themselves while they waited in the wings, now they have to pretend they have a landslide government which is no such thing they are a minority government voted for by a minority, they are going to be hounded night and day. While their followers of fashion somehow try and hold together the whole rotten sham pretending it is democratic. Two tier Keir is like we said before any election is batting on a very sticky wicket and has been put in a catch 22 position by the establishment while the voters have rejected them before they even started with their nonsense. There has never been a a government with over 50% ( a majority ) of votes in the entire history of general elections in the UK. The largest majority in UK general election history was 179 by the Labour Party under Tony Blair in 1997. Our voting system is what it is, and the Labour Party last month came out on top with the most votes, and the most elected MPs. There have been plenty of Conservative victories with a smaller share of the vote than Keir Starmer. In which elections was a conservative government government elected on a 20% vote of the electorate? |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Aug 24, 2024 13:46:44 GMT
Starmer became head of the CPS in 2008, and by his own blatherings on the Labour Party website chose to focus on Human Rights and Stephen Lawrence, leaving in 2013 having been forced to bring in changes in the wake of Saville and Yewtree Sexual abuse of white girls in Rotherham by Pakistani men started in the 1980s and continued on an I dustrial scale until Starmer was replaced as head of the CPS in 2013 The only trial occuring on Starmer's watch was undertaken in Sheffield in 2010 after an investigation begun BEFORE he took over as head of the CPS and found a miserably pitiful FIVE Pakistani men guilty of numerous offences including breach of previous orders and licence conditions over the abuse of a handful of girls. Considering the subsequent public enquiries found the authorities delinquent in following up the reports of abuse of one thousand four hundred girls, a pretty piss poor performance by a man by his own mouth more interested in pursuing supposed human rights abused against Carribbean than against any white person. John you are an intelligent individual so there is no excuse for you to ignore the process that the CPS works to. The only cases brought to the CPS by the police over raping and abusing your females by Pakistanis was prosecuted and sentences were passed. Saville's case was never brought to the CPS, so the CPS / Starmer played no part in Saville escaping prosecution. _" The case received widespread attention on Oct. 4, 2012, when British broadcaster ITV aired a program in which five women said they had been abused by Savile in the 1970s. Three of them said the abuse occurred at BBC facilities. The accusations led to the creation of a task force, named Operation Yewtree, the day after the program aired." It then had to be investigated by the police and a case put together with witnesses prepared to give evidence before the CPS could prosecute. You can put some blame on local authorities and perhaps on the police, BUT NOT ON THE CPS which did exactly what they were supposed to do. Rubbish - why don't you check basic facts before posting your standard ''I worship the ground Labour walks on'' lies? The CPS (of which Starmer was big boss) decided not to prosecute when sent the files -I've even linked the lefty Guardian article so you cannot dispute it The Crown Prosecution Service examined sexual assault claims involving four alleged victims of Jimmy Savile in 2009 following an investigation by Surrey police.
On Monday, the CPS revealed for the first time that it reviewed assault claims involving more than one alleged victim while the Jim'll Fix It host was still alive.
Three of the alleged victims were aged under 16, including two pupils at the Duncroft approved school in Surrey in the late 1970s and a girl at the Stoke Mandeville hospital, where Savile was a regular visitor.
www.theguardian.com/media/2012/oct/22/jimmy-savile-cps-sexual-assault-2009DPP Kier Starmer QC asked his Principal Legal Advisor, Alison Levitt QC, to examine the Crown Prosecution Service’s decisions in relation to the four allegations made to Surrey and Sussex Police in 2007 and 2008, that Savile indecently assaulted girls and young women in the 1970s.
Levitt found that whilst there was nothing to suggest that the decisions not to prosecute were consciously influenced by any improper motive on the part of either police or prosecutors, “[h]aving spoken to the victims I have been driven to conclude that had the police and prosecutors taken a different approach a prosecution might have been possible.”
www.counselmagazine.co.uk/articles/dpp-apologises-savile
|
|
