|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 22, 2024 10:41:44 GMT
Bollocks, fiddles. Even in 2010 they had a bigger vote share than Two-Tier. But the Labour Party were still 10 points clear of the Conservatives, and Labour are the party with the most votes and most seats under our system of voting, no one can claim that Labour are not the rightfull government. The difference between Labour and the Conservatives at the general election was nearly 3 million votes You are like those stupid Republicans in the US who claim that Trump really won the last US election You were still talking shit about vote share. |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Aug 22, 2024 10:48:44 GMT
But the Labour Party were still 10 points clear of the Conservatives, and Labour are the party with the most votes and most seats under our system of voting, no one can claim that Labour are not the rightfull government. The difference between Labour and the Conservatives at the general election was nearly 3 million votes You are like those stupid Republicans in the US who claim that Trump really won the last US election You were still talking shit about vote share. ok, so let me try and put it to you another way, seen as you dont seem to be able to understand basic mathmatics If the Labour Party got 9,708, 716 votes ( which they did ) and the second party The Conservatives got 6,828, 925 ( which they did ) A difference of 2,879,791 Which party is the rightfull government ? |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 22, 2024 10:53:40 GMT
You were still talking shit about vote share. ok, so let me try and put it to you another way, seen as you dont seem to be able to understand basic mathmatics If the Labour Party got 9,708, 716 votes ( which they did ) and the second party The Conservatives got 6,828, 925 ( which they did ) A difference of 2,879,791 Which party is the rightfull government ? That's not what you said, fiddles. There have been plenty of Conservative victories with a smaller share of the vote than Keir Starmer... And that was total bullshit. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 11:14:49 GMT
No it wasn’t . You are posting your opinion as fact. A moronic opinion that Hitler was so stupid that he didn’t realise that invading other countries and genocide was not an extreme act and therefore he was an extremist . Your last line is classic projection from you .lol. You have posted YOUR opinion on what Hitler would be thinking and that is pure projection on your part. I have been posting his reactions as seen on film shown on TV, which indicate that he was so well pleased with his victories he repeated them over and over again. A stated opinion is not a projection, which you would know if you fully understood projection. Nope.You posted your opinion as fact and when you are presented with a fact you project your delusion by telling the other posters are posting opinions. You not only projecting but utterly boring too. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Aug 22, 2024 12:15:36 GMT
Um ... You're new around here aren't you I'm saying when a prime minister who as head of the CPS did fuck all about Pakistani men batch processing white girls in care for rape and other sexual offences on an industrial scale, calls white men who get annoyed about such terrorists, then perhaps we should have taken that route earlier, much earlier. After all, Labour gave the man in charge of the two miners who threw a concrete block at the taxi taking a blackleg to work, killing the driver, a safe seat and a place on the Privy Counsel, ensu d that the Provisional IRA'a political wing always got the upper hand in Northern Ireland, and happily accepted the political support of a bunch of welsh nationalists who bred labradors to carry IED's to kill policemen, blew up reservoirs and set fire to cottages. And as for GCHQ ... I rather enjoyed the little chat I had with their official public interface after the local plod did fuck all about my daughter being raped by an islamic here with fake academic qualifications studying 'islamic finance' at the university up the road... In the face of their inactivity I took copies of my evidence to their chaps when I went to tell them I was standing as a BNP candidate in the 2010 General Election. Their first question was 'why' My answer was that I wished to see the return of the death penalty and it's application for the offence of rape, as it was in the past, albeit in those times it was in fact a punishment for the theft and enjoyment of another man's property as opposed to the application as I would press for if elected, as a punishment for the offences against the person acts... I also said that should they choose to curtail my security clearance I will naturally tell every newspaper and media source this was clearly in response to my actions taken in protest at their failure to deal with an Islamist in this country on fake papers spreading AIDS by rape of white women while the police stood by and did nothing For some reason neither MI anything, CGHQ, or the Security Vetting Service saw my decision to stand for Parliament on a mandate of bringing back the death penalty and making it available as a punishment for rape as grounds to remove my clearance to work on classified projects. I wonder why that might be ... The job of the Head of the CPS is to see cases brought forward by the police, are properly addressed. Cases brought with proof to the CPS by the police were prosecuted (in 2012 IIRC) Starmer became head of the CPS in 2008, and by his own blatherings on the Labour Party website chose to focus on Human Rights and Stephen Lawrence, leaving in 2013 having been forced to bring in changes in the wake of Saville and Yewtree Sexual abuse of white girls in Rotherham by Pakistani men started in the 1980s and continued on an I dustrial scale until Starmer was replaced as head of the CPS in 2013 The only trial occuring on Starmer's watch was undertaken in Sheffield in 2010 after an investigation begun BEFORE he took over as head of the CPS and found a miserably pitiful FIVE Pakistani men guilty of numerous offences including breach of previous orders and licence conditions over the abuse of a handful of girls. Considering the subsequent public enquiries found the authorities delinquent in following up the reports of abuse of one thousand four hundred girls, a pretty piss poor performance by a man by his own mouth more interested in pursuing supposed human rights abused against Carribbean than against any white person. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Aug 22, 2024 12:16:56 GMT
Um ... You're new around here aren't you I'm saying when a prime minister who as head of the CPS did fuck all about Pakistani men batch processing white girls in care for rape and other sexual offences on an industrial scale, calls white men who get annoyed about such terrorists, then perhaps we should have taken that route earlier, much earlier. After all, Labour gave the man in charge of the two miners who threw a concrete block at the taxi taking a blackleg to work, killing the driver, a safe seat and a place on the Privy Counsel, ensu d that the Provisional IRA'a political wing always got the upper hand in Northern Ireland, and happily accepted the political support of a bunch of welsh nationalists who bred labradors to carry IED's to kill policemen, blew up reservoirs and set fire to cottages. And as for GCHQ ... I rather enjoyed the little chat I had with their official public interface after the local plod did fuck all about my daughter being raped by an islamic here with fake academic qualifications studying 'islamic finance' at the university up the road... In the face of their inactivity I took copies of my evidence to their chaps when I went to tell them I was standing as a BNP candidate in the 2010 General Election. Their first question was 'why' My answer was that I wished to see the return of the death penalty and it's application for the offence of rape, as it was in the past, albeit in those times it was in fact a punishment for the theft and enjoyment of another man's property as opposed to the application as I would press for if elected, as a punishment for the offences against the person acts... I also said that should they choose to curtail my security clearance I will naturally tell every newspaper and media source this was clearly in response to my actions taken in protest at their failure to deal with an Islamist in this country on fake papers spreading AIDS by rape of white women while the police stood by and did nothing For some reason neither MI anything, CGHQ, or the Security Vetting Service saw my decision to stand for Parliament on a mandate of bringing back the death penalty and making it available as a punishment for rape as grounds to remove my clearance to work on classified projects. I wonder why that might be ... None of this is a defence for your sympathy and support for Anders Breivik's actions. Saying he was right to murder all those kids is alarming. And another thing. If my wife was raped by an immigrant, I would hate the person who did it, not all immigrants. And I certainly wouldn't join a neo-nazi party. Wanting the DP for rape is stupid, which is why no one has been hanged for rape in almost 200 years. Again, no other party wanted to deal with the problem if islamic rapists. If they had, I might have joined them. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Aug 22, 2024 15:55:10 GMT
You have posted YOUR opinion on what Hitler would be thinking and that is pure projection on your part. I have been posting his reactions as seen on film shown on TV, which indicate that he was so well pleased with his victories he repeated them over and over again. A stated opinion is not a projection, which you would know if you fully understood projection. Nope.You posted your opinion as fact and when you are presented with a fact you project your delusion by telling the other posters are posting opinions. You not only projecting but utterly boring too. Nope, a stated opinion is not stated as a fact. I stated IMO. In My Opinion. so stop confusing yourself and making an idiot of yourself (your choice) by posting untruths about me. You even posted that you disagreed with my opinion LOL You repeatedly dilute any credibility you might have had. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 16:07:47 GMT
Nope.You posted your opinion as fact and when you are presented with a fact you project your delusion by telling the other posters are posting opinions. You not only projecting but utterly boring too. Nope, a stated opinion is not stated as a fact. I stated IMO. In My Opinion. so stop confusing yourself and making an idiot of yourself (your choice) by posting untruths about me. You even posted that you disagreed with my opinion LOL You repeatedly dilute any credibility you might have had. You “ I am saying that Hitler had other things in mind, successes for instance, rather than negative thoughts of extremism“ Thats a statement of fact. It looks like you are confused . Now stop projecting and stop being a bore . |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Aug 22, 2024 16:17:59 GMT
The job of the Head of the CPS is to see cases brought forward by the police, are properly addressed. Cases brought with proof to the CPS by the police were prosecuted (in 2012 IIRC) Starmer became head of the CPS in 2008, and by his own blatherings on the Labour Party website chose to focus on Human Rights and Stephen Lawrence, leaving in 2013 having been forced to bring in changes in the wake of Saville and Yewtree Sexual abuse of white girls in Rotherham by Pakistani men started in the 1980s and continued on an I dustrial scale until Starmer was replaced as head of the CPS in 2013 The only trial occuring on Starmer's watch was undertaken in Sheffield in 2010 after an investigation begun BEFORE he took over as head of the CPS and found a miserably pitiful FIVE Pakistani men guilty of numerous offences including breach of previous orders and licence conditions over the abuse of a handful of girls. Considering the subsequent public enquiries found the authorities delinquent in following up the reports of abuse of one thousand four hundred girls, a pretty piss poor performance by a man by his own mouth more interested in pursuing supposed human rights abused against Carribbean than against any white person. John you are an intelligent individual so there is no excuse for you to ignore the process that the CPS works to. The only cases brought to the CPS by the police over raping and abusing your females by Pakistanis was prosecuted and sentences were passed. Saville's case was never brought to the CPS, so the CPS / Starmer played no part in Saville escaping prosecution. _" The case received widespread attention on Oct. 4, 2012, when British broadcaster ITV aired a program in which five women said they had been abused by Savile in the 1970s. Three of them said the abuse occurred at BBC facilities. The accusations led to the creation of a task force, named Operation Yewtree, the day after the program aired." It then had to be investigated by the police and a case put together with witnesses prepared to give evidence before the CPS could prosecute. You can put some blame on local authorities and perhaps on the police, BUT NOT ON THE CPS which did exactly what they were supposed to do. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Aug 22, 2024 16:23:34 GMT
Nope, a stated opinion is not stated as a fact. I stated IMO. In My Opinion. so stop confusing yourself and making an idiot of yourself (your choice) by posting untruths about me. You even posted that you disagreed with my opinion LOL You repeatedly dilute any credibility you might have had. You “ I am saying that Hitler had other things in mind, successes for instance, rather than negative thoughts of extremism“Thats a statement of fact. It looks like you are confused . Now stop projecting and stop being a bore . That was me trying to explain to some moron why I had formed my opinion about Hitler. You obviously can't even think straight. Try being objective and stop wasting so much space and time with your meandering mutterings. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 16:30:24 GMT
You “ I am saying that Hitler had other things in mind, successes for instance, rather than negative thoughts of extremism“Thats a statement of fact. It looks like you are confused . Now stop projecting and stop being a bore . That was me trying to explain to some moron why I had formed my opinion about Hitler. You obviously can't even think straight. Try being objective and stop wasting so much space and time with your meandering mutterings. You made a specific statement . The bolded sentence is projection from you . |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Aug 22, 2024 17:10:37 GMT
Nope, a stated opinion is not stated as a fact. I stated IMO. In My Opinion. so stop confusing yourself and making an idiot of yourself (your choice) by posting untruths about me. You even posted that you disagreed with my opinion LOL You repeatedly dilute any credibility you might have had. You “ I am saying that Hitler had other things in mind, successes for instance, rather than negative thoughts of extremism“ Thats a statement of fact. It looks like you are confused . Now stop projecting and stop being a bore . Already explained. Stop lying. Stay confused you have reached a laughable stage. You have never, that is not once, have you provided evidence of your dishonest accusation of projection by myself. You have not, because you cannot because you do not fully understand projection. All you have is insinuation and your ability to use your opinions to add 2+2 together and end up with 20 LOL Carry on digging LOL. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 22, 2024 17:12:36 GMT
You “ I am saying that Hitler had other things in mind, successes for instance, rather than negative thoughts of extremism“ Thats a statement of fact. It looks like you are confused . Now stop projecting and stop being a bore . Already explained. Stop lying. Stay confused you have reached a laughable stage. You have never, that is not once, have you provided evidence of your dishonest accusation of projection by myself. You have not, because you cannot because you do not fully understand projection. All you have is insinuation and your ability to use your opinions to add 2+2 together and end up with 20 LOL Carry on digging LOL. Projection ( in bold ). Im bored now . |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Aug 22, 2024 17:27:15 GMT
Well let's face it, Labour thought they were being clever just sitting back and watching the Conservatives destroy themselves while they waited in the wings, now they have to pretend they have a landslide government which is no such thing they are a minority government voted for by a minority, they are going to be hounded night and day. While their followers of fashion somehow try and hold together the whole rotten sham pretending it is democratic. Two tier Keir is like we said before any election is batting on a very sticky wicket and has been put in a catch 22 position by the establishment while the voters have rejected them before they even started with their nonsense. There has never been a a government with over 50% ( a majority ) of votes in the entire history of general elections in the UK. The largest majority in UK general election history was 179 by the Labour Party under Tony Blair in 1997. Our voting system is what it is, and the Labour Party last month came out on top with the most votes, and the most elected MPs. There have been plenty of Conservative victories with a smaller share of the vote than Keir Starmer. You might even be called upon to lie for them, but then nothing new in that where politics is concerned. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Aug 22, 2024 17:51:36 GMT
Already explained. Stop lying. Stay confused you have reached a laughable stage. You have never, that is not once, have you provided evidence of your dishonest accusation of projection by myself. You have not, because you cannot because you do not fully understand projection. All you have is insinuation and your ability to use your opinions to add 2+2 together and end up with 20 LOL Carry on digging LOL. Projection ( in bold ). Im bored now . Then piss of and give decent reasonable people a break. |
|
