|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Aug 5, 2024 12:25:01 GMT
It's strange that Starmer is so keen on supporting the muslims when in general he seems to hate the "Right". So where does he think muslims sit on the political spectrum?
He plainly thinks that they're Left wing, but the thing about islam is that it's a "religion" (loosely) which has a political stance to it because it includes fairly rigid laws (sharia) and also has political aspirations in that it regards believers (in islam) to be superior to the infidels/kuffar and it has ambitions to dominate the globe. It advocates a global caliphate.
These views are more accurately characterised as "far Right". In fact they're more far Right than the Nazis' views. The Nazis' proposed elimination of the Jews and the creation of the Third Reich pales into insignificance when set against the muslims' global caliphate, the elimination of Israel from the map and the subjugation of all non-muslims.
Starmer once said he didn't really understand politics. He was right.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2024 14:55:20 GMT
I think the term Islamofascism is a valid one for radical and political Islam. The government do not seem to grasp that there is a threat from people shouting Allahu Akbar in a group and running down the streets in a threatening manner.
|
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 5, 2024 17:42:05 GMT
I think the term Islamofascism is a valid one for radical and political Islam. The government do not seem to grasp that there is a threat from people shouting Allahu Akbar in a group and running down the streets in a threatening manner. It’s not just the govt but some posters on here too says it’s not threatening why is a mystery to me |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Aug 5, 2024 18:19:44 GMT
I think the term Islamofascism is a valid one for radical and political Islam. The government do not seem to grasp that there is a threat from people shouting Allahu Akbar in a group and running down the streets in a threatening manner. Which is a little odd really, considering the number a high profile events involving people shouting Allahu Akbar just shortly before (or during) the process of killing innocent people. Its almost like large parts of their position are held in bad faith. |
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Aug 6, 2024 7:34:28 GMT
I think the term Islamofascism is a valid one for radical and political Islam. The government do not seem to grasp that there is a threat from people shouting Allahu Akbar in a group and running down the streets in a threatening manner. I think the basic problem, as I've said before, is that Islam is not a "religion" but it has all the exemptions from law that a religion seems to be automatically granted. In Arabic Islam is called a "din", which is best translated as "way of life". When people adopt Islam they not only adopt an "ideology" (a very intolerant ideology) but they sign up to a system of law (sharia) and a political manifesto - which has been called Islamism. And all these ideologies, beliefs etc were made up in about AD700 by the Prophet Mohammed - a person who nowadays would be diagnosed as some kind of schizophrenic who hears voices. Islam basically has no place in any modern society - for so many reasons that it would take too long to list. Yet the Labour party seem to be completely in thrall to the muslims. I think part of the reason for this is that people such as Starmer think that muslims are "Left" politically. But the fact is that they're far Right. In fact the muslims are the new Nazis. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Aug 6, 2024 8:14:47 GMT
I think the term Islamofascism is a valid one for radical and political Islam. The government do not seem to grasp that there is a threat from people shouting Allahu Akbar in a group and running down the streets in a threatening manner. Islam basically has no place in any modern society - for so many reasons that it would take too long to list. Yet the Labour party seem to be completely in thrall to the muslims. I think part of the reason for this is that people such as Starmer think that muslims are "Left" politically. But the fact is that they're far Right. In fact the muslims are the new Nazis. Don't discount the possibility that some section of this perverse attitude comes from a genuine wish to hurt and discomfort people. Starmer was presented recently with an opportunity to acknowledge that more than one group has been involved in the recent street disturbances - a simple enough acknowledgement of fact. He refused because it would dilute his ability to keep hammering on one group in particular. In other words, he has ulterior motivations |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2024 9:24:37 GMT
Islam basically has no place in any modern society - for so many reasons that it would take too long to list. Yet the Labour party seem to be completely in thrall to the muslims. I think part of the reason for this is that people such as Starmer think that muslims are "Left" politically. But the fact is that they're far Right. In fact the muslims are the new Nazis. Don't discount the possibility that some section of this perverse attitude comes from a genuine wish to hurt and discomfort people. Starmer was presented recently with an opportunity to acknowledge that more than one group has been involved in the recent street disturbances - a simple enough acknowledgement of fact. He refused because it would dilute his ability to keep hammering on one group in particular. In other words, he has ulterior motivations It does seem that the various authorities want each of us to be assimilated into a "Borg" like entity where everyone acts and thinks like some collective for the greater good. Their perception of what is good or evil is already tarnished by instructions to back terror sympathisers as "peace marchers" or protesting "colonialism", even being told to refer to men as women. If we don't become part of the collective we will be crushed. If we do become part of the collective, we will be crushed, because Islam must take over. It is in their DNA. |
|
