|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 5, 2024 11:48:14 GMT
A terrific article on the Unherd site - which also, surprisingly, appears in a slightly shorter version in today’s Times – provides a highly coherent analysis of the background to the current ‘riots’ and the state’s response to them.
Everyone, whether ‘leftie liberals’ or ‘far-right fascists’ or anyone between those two extremes, will benefit from a close reading since, in my view, the article has great explanatory power.
The article starts as follows, citing a recent example of the lengths to which the British state will go to avoid what has become its greatest nightmare – the prospect of violent ‘intercommunal’ strife between the majority Native British and other ethnic groups who are part of what it now terms ‘the global majority’ (the terms BME/BAME now being officially taboo). Following the Manchester Arena bombing in 2017, the aftermath, like those of other recent terrorist atrocities, was marked by what later revealed to be a coordinated British government policy of “controlled spontaneity”. Pre-planned vigils and inter-faith events were rolled out, and people handed out flowers “in apparently unprompted gestures of love and support” as part of an information operation “to shape public responses, encouraging individuals to focus on empathy for the victims and a sense of unity with strangers, rather than reacting with violence and anger”. If anyone is unsure about how and why ‘controlled spontaneity’ came to be the state’s default response to terrorist atrocities – and even seemingly events like Southport officially deemed to be unrelated to terrorism – there is a handy refresher here. More later. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 5, 2024 13:13:31 GMT
One of the most useful parts of the Unherd article is the jargon decoder it provides in respect of the euphemisms the state and its operatives, including elected or appointed officials and (practically) all politicians, deploy when seeking to avoid mention or discussion of ethnic conflict. Such as:
‘British Values’: a superficial national symbolism constructed to avoid ethnic conflict;
‘Knife Crime’: a term invented by the state (and deployed by Starmer in Southport) to euphemicise the largely black epidemic of violent personal attacks using knives and similar weapons;
‘Communities’: non-native ethnic groups, as in after the recent rioting by Balkan Roma in Leeds, the perpetrators were nebulously referred to as ‘the Harehills community’. Ditto Muslims in Southport, etc.;
‘Community Cohesion’: state-managed avoidance of ethnic conflict. Viewed as the antidote to the fascistic focus on national cohesion, which threatens inter-communal harmony.
‘Community Leaders’: the state’s chosen intermediaries when needing to defuse tensions between the white majority and other ethnic groups, or between such groups themselves;
‘The Far Right’: the preferred term when seeking to isolate from mainstream discourse any potential advocates for a white British identity;
‘Global Majority’: the now-preferred term to refer to what used to be called BME or BAME, both the latter now being deprecated; |
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Aug 9, 2024 10:10:42 GMT
Guess historian David Starkey sums up the situation to a degree in this piece.
…. though I don’t think it is just Labour being complicit here in the destructive agendas being employed … the Tories/Zionists embraced an extremist Islamic creeping programme of infiltration into the UK … and failed to shut down immigration centres processing mass invasion that completely changed the landscape, character and culture of many towns and cities in Britain today.
Alienating the indigenous people.
A concerted programme to mass invade and destroy the integrity of our Country from the inside. … now seen in the sorts of inter-racial violence we see them engage in … mirrored in Asia + Africa … especially the Middle East … and thru BLM in the USA.
Prepped violence … as these immigrant groups have systematically gone about accumulating weaponry for this moment … and flaunt their weapons openly on what used to be streets made safe by an effective Police Force.
Alas, no longer … we have a Police Force destroyed and made a joke by Leftism and WOKE shackling …. coupled with the Deep State deliberately deploying our Army and Navy aggressively on Russia’s borders, rather than DEFENDING our HOME LAND.
These Deep State traitors need removing IMMEDIATELY … and indigenous Britons put back in CONTROL …. those who can remove the CIA and Zionist malevolent forces agitating destruction of our Nation from the INSIDE. … using the MSM + BBC as ‘malevolent propaganda’ => attacking and undermining the INDIGENOUS TRIBAL core values of this Country … that never used to brush under the carpet knife/gun crime perpetrated by religious extremism and rap gang culture linked to racist immigrants and their hostility towards any sort of Law and Order. … (again openly promoted by the BBC … as their DJ’s tried to be ‘hip’ and ‘dangerous’.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Aug 9, 2024 10:16:14 GMT
Full of paradoxes. Zionists are Jewish not Islamist dear. And Zionism is simply about having a homeland for Jews in the ancestral territory of Israel, nothing more. The fact that Netanyahu is a murderer is neither here nor there in respect of Zionism. Rabin was a Zionist. Zelenskyy is a Jew and condemns Netanyahu. Your arguments are shamed by internet bollox. Get better sources instead of bitshit.
And stop prattling on about Zionism like some demented Nazi.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Aug 9, 2024 10:22:24 GMT
It’s all under the umbrella of Religious agitation … or haven’t you worked that out yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 9, 2024 10:22:35 GMT
This thread looked interesting. Pity the gruesome twosome want to high Jack it .
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 9, 2024 10:38:45 GMT
The notion that there has been, and continues to be, a conspiracy to transform not just the UK but all western liberal democracies into multiracial societies in which the native population is just another one of many minorities or 'communities' seems to be a popular one with the membership.
What is lacking though is any insight into who, or what is driving the process and the historical background to it.
In that respect I welcome Dubdrifters contribution. At least David Starkey is a distinguished historian, albeit one cancelled by the wokerati for his non-approved attitudes towards minorities and currently fashionable shibboleths.
Vinny, as usual, simply spouts cartoonish banalities.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Aug 9, 2024 10:39:05 GMT
It’s all under the umbrella of Religious agitation … or haven’t you worked that out yet? Oh I'll condemn religious trouble makers, but haven't you worked out, you're one yourself? You follow the new age religion of the tin foil hat conspiracy theorists whilst absolutely ignoring real conspiracies!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Aug 9, 2024 10:43:52 GMT
The notion that there has been, and continues to be, a conspiracy to transform not just the UK but all western liberal democracies into multiracial societies in which the native population is just another one of many minorities or 'communities' seems to be a popular one with the membership. What is lacking though is any insight into who, or what is driving the process and the historical background to it. In that respect I welcome Dubdrifters contribution. At least David Starkey is a distinguished historian, albeit one cancelled by the wokerati for his non-approved attitudes towards minorities and currently fashionable shibboleths. Vinny, as usual, simply spouts cartoonish banalities. Multi racial is not the problem, multi cultural is a problem, because of cultural relativism, and religious bigotry. Salafist Islam for example, decades of terrorist attacks from it and it still hasn't been countered by the establishment in our country. Start with educating school children.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 9, 2024 10:54:13 GMT
The notion that there has been, and continues to be, a conspiracy to transform not just the UK but all western liberal democracies into multiracial societies in which the native population is just another one of many minorities or 'communities' seems to be a popular one with the membership. What is lacking though is any insight into who, or what is driving the process and the historical background to it. In that respect I welcome Dubdrifters contribution. At least David Starkey is a distinguished historian, albeit one cancelled by the wokerati for his non-approved attitudes towards minorities and currently fashionable shibboleths. Vinny, as usual, simply spouts cartoonish banalities. Well it’s pretty obvious that the state is trying to destroy national identity , sexual identity and racial identity . lefties in particular want to demonise , Christianity, white people and older people. Of you you destroy identity then you destroy the person . If I wanted to destroy society in order to reconstruct it . That’s what I would do . It’s a tried and tested method . |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 9, 2024 10:56:42 GMT
Vinny : Culture is a function of race, and religion is a function of culture. Are you aware of any multiracial mono-cultures? As for educating schoolchildren they are already being taught that all cultures are of equal worth and value. That starts as early as key stage 2 in the National Curriculum and is reinforced throughout the curriculum, with great emphasis on 'human rights and international law' and 'the diverse national, regional, religious and ethnic identities in the United Kingdom and the need for mutual respect and understanding.'
|
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Aug 9, 2024 11:01:56 GMT
Who would you rather live next door to? Someone who is Pakistani but doesn't believe in Islam, or any religion, or, a white convert to Islam who is suddenly very extreme and intolerant?
I'd rather live next door to someone who isn't a bigot, whatever their colour.
Yes, we've imported rather a lot of bigots, but not all Pakistanis / Indians / Bangladeshis or blacks are the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 9, 2024 11:03:35 GMT
Oh do put a sock in it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 9, 2024 11:06:31 GMT
The notion that there has been, and continues to be, a conspiracy to transform not just the UK but all western liberal democracies into multiracial societies in which the native population is just another one of many minorities or 'communities' seems to be a popular one with the membership. What is lacking though is any insight into who, or what is driving the process and the historical background to it. In that respect I welcome Dubdrifters contribution. At least David Starkey is a distinguished historian, albeit one cancelled by the wokerati for his non-approved attitudes towards minorities and currently fashionable shibboleths. Vinny, as usual, simply spouts cartoonish banalities. Well it’s pretty obvious that the state is trying to destroy national identity , sexual identity and racial identity . lefties in particular want to demonise , Christianity, white people and older people. Of you you destroy identity then you destroy the person . If I wanted to destroy society in order to reconstruct it . That’s what I would do . It’s a tried and tested method . I think the process is very apparent, but in knowing that we're not any closer to understanding why it is happening and how it all came about in the first place. There are a number of theories about that, so what's yours? |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Aug 9, 2024 11:07:57 GMT
No. Answer the bloody question. Would you rather live next door to someone who is none white but not a twat, or someone who is white but has become a religious arsehole like this massive tosser?  |
|
