|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 4, 2024 20:20:16 GMT
Genuine Asylum Seekers are NOT Illegal Immigrants. I am willing to bet that no one at all attacking that Rotherham hotel had any fucking clue about the legal status of anyone in there. The ONLY thing they cared about was the colour of their skin. All The Best I bet you cannot say that without questioning your own logic, if they arrived here illegally that makes them illegal immigrants, the clue is in the illegal bit, they might well become legal by definition as the system which they are told is overwhelmed and the likely hood is they will receive another block amnesty, which of course happens every time. Is Nulla the new Einhorn?  |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Aug 4, 2024 20:23:44 GMT
I beg to differ slightly: Illegal immigrants are technically all criminals. Genuine Asylum Seekers are NOT Illegal Immigrants. I am willing to bet that no one at all attacking that Rotherham hotel had any fucking clue about the legal status of anyone in there. The ONLY thing they cared about was the colour of their skin. All The Best There are two reasons why people fleeing the horrors of war torn France for sanctuary in England are considered to be a refugees/asylum seekers: a) A globalist political establishment who think more of the EU than they do of the UK b) The ECHR. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 4, 2024 20:24:06 GMT
They know nothing about the people in the hotel other than they are illegal migrants seeking asylum and have no documentation. Not having them there makes their daughters safer as the whole issue is one of risk. They aren't illegal immigrants they are asylum seekers. They are always illegal migrants, they may be granted asylum but will always be illegal migrants. The Convention does not say their illegal entry is expunged it says no sanction should be taken against then for their method of entry |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 4, 2024 20:29:45 GMT
If you genuinely cared about protecting children form the perceived danger of child sex grooming gangs you be advocating for the banning of the Catholic Church. Asian Grooming Gangs would have to commit one Rotherham type crime spree every week for a decade and still they wouldn't be close to the Catholic Church's tally for kiddie abuse.... So this clearly is NOT about protecting children.; and is almost exclusively about the colour of someone's skin - and that makes it a cut and dried case of racism. All The Best So by Sandy's logic burning down Catholic churches full of Catholics would make our kids safer, right Sandy? Well apart from the skewed logic the problem was Catholic Priests being given charge of youngsters willingly by parents. There is no desire to allow unknown males to live amongst their children in numbers. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 4, 2024 20:29:55 GMT
Genuine Asylum Seekers are NOT Illegal Immigrants. I am willing to bet that no one at all attacking that Rotherham hotel had any fucking clue about the legal status of anyone in there. The ONLY thing they cared about was the colour of their skin. All The Best I bet you cannot say that without questioning your own logic, Genuine Asylum Seekers are NOT illegal immigrants. I mean that is just a legal fact. I'd argue that anyone crossing the channel from France is not a Genuine Asylum Seeker UNLESS they can provide clear evidence that they face persecution in France. But that does not change the veracity of my first sentence. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 4, 2024 20:30:46 GMT
Genuine Asylum Seekers are NOT Illegal Immigrants. I am willing to bet that no one at all attacking that Rotherham hotel had any fucking clue about the legal status of anyone in there. The ONLY thing they cared about was the colour of their skin. All The Best There are two reasons why people fleeing the horrors of war torn France for sanctuary in England are considered to be a refugees/asylum seekers: a) A globalist political establishment who think more of the EU than they do of the UK b) The ECHR. You forgot the biggest and real reason: Capitalist Economic Pressures. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 4, 2024 20:32:09 GMT
So by Sandy's logic burning down Catholic churches full of Catholics would make our kids safer, right Sandy? Well apart from the skewed logic the problem was Catholic Priests being given charge of youngsters willingly by parents. There is no desire to allow unknown males to live amongst their children in numbers. Ah, so now you are effectively saying Catholic Priests who fiddled kids get a free pass if those kids were placed, unknowingly, in harm by their parents? Really? All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 4, 2024 20:32:51 GMT
I beg to differ slightly: Illegal immigrants are technically all criminals. Genuine Asylum Seekers are NOT Illegal Immigrants. I am willing to bet that no one at all attacking that Rotherham hotel had any fucking clue about the legal status of anyone in there. The ONLY thing they cared about was the colour of their skin. All The Best You have no evidence to make that claim. What the hotel is used for is known in the local area |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 4, 2024 20:35:42 GMT
Calling migrants who enter the country from France illegally’ asylum seekers’ is like calling burglars ‘resource seekers ‘.
|
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 4, 2024 20:35:49 GMT
Well apart from the skewed logic the problem was Catholic Priests being given charge of youngsters willingly by parents. There is no desire to allow unknown males to live amongst their children in numbers. Ah, so now you are effectively saying Catholic Priests who fiddled kids get a free pass if those kids were placed, unknowingly, in harm by their parents? Really? All The Best Nope, they were placed in a position of trust to a man who was approved by the church. Their trust was misplaced. People do not trust those in Asylum hotels so there is no trust to misplace. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 4, 2024 20:41:41 GMT
Genuine Asylum Seekers are NOT Illegal Immigrants. I am willing to bet that no one at all attacking that Rotherham hotel had any fucking clue about the legal status of anyone in there. The ONLY thing they cared about was the colour of their skin. All The Best What the hotel is used for is known in the local area Says the man who has provided no evidence at all for any of his ludicrous claims in the last week. Is there any proof the Rotherham Hotel attackers wee local? Or were they bussed-in EDL Rent-a-Thugs? All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 4, 2024 20:50:41 GMT
So by Sandy's logic burning down Catholic churches full of Catholics would make our kids safer, right Sandy? Well apart from the skewed logic the problem was Catholic Priests being given charge of youngsters willingly by parents. There is no desire to allow unknown males to live amongst their children in numbers. It's not my skewed logic it's yours. You keep saying it's about numbers and risks. As PV has pointed out statistically catholic priests are a far bigger danger to kids than asylum seekers. So burning down a building with Catholic priests in would make our kids safer by your logic wouldn't it? And again, from the point of view of an ethnic minority, asylum seeker or Muslim the events of the past few days suggests it's white people like you that are the biggest danger to their kids. So setting fire to a building with you in makes their kids safer yes? |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 4, 2024 20:52:34 GMT
You have no evidence to make that claim. What the hotel is used for is known in the local area Says the man who has provided no evidence at all for any of his ludicrous claims in the last week. Is there any proof the Rotherham Hotel attackers wee local? Or were they bussed-in EDL Rent-a-Thugs? All The Best Who knows who anyone is, you seem determined to negate any local input into any actions. We know that many arrested in Southport were local, no doubt those arrested in Rotherham will come to light. Considering the number of demonstrations throughout the country the EDL rent a thugs are widely available. So far there has been little evidence for this other than the mayor of Southport saying they were not local and were bussed and trained in. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 4, 2024 20:56:36 GMT
Well apart from the skewed logic the problem was Catholic Priests being given charge of youngsters willingly by parents. There is no desire to allow unknown males to live amongst their children in numbers. It's not my skewed logic it's yours. You keep saying it's about numbers and risks. As PV has pointed out statistically catholic priests are a far bigger danger to kids than asylum seekers. So burning down a building with Catholic priests in would make our kids safer by your logic wouldn't it? And again, from the point of view of an ethnic minority, asylum seeker or Muslim the events of the past few days suggests it's white people like you that are the biggest danger to their kids. So setting fire to a building with you in makes their kids safer yes? This is desperate stuff. People have a choice whether to deposit their children into safe keeping of priests, people have no choice as regards the accommodation provided in their areas from which young men of unknown origins are allowed to stay and to move freely from. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 4, 2024 21:00:02 GMT
It's not my skewed logic it's yours. You keep saying it's about numbers and risks. As PV has pointed out statistically catholic priests are a far bigger danger to kids than asylum seekers. So burning down a building with Catholic priests in would make our kids safer by your logic wouldn't it? And again, from the point of view of an ethnic minority, asylum seeker or Muslim the events of the past few days suggests it's white people like you that are the biggest danger to their kids. So setting fire to a building with you in makes their kids safer yes? This is desperate stuff. People have a choice whether to deposit their children into safe keeping of priests, people have no choice as regards the accommodation provided in their areas from which young men of unknown origins are allowed to stay and to move freely from. Priests are free to move about their communties as they please. |
|
