|
Post by Bentley on Aug 2, 2024 12:46:27 GMT
No Im saying the threats by Muslim extremists “We can cause riots and no one can stop us . Tomorrow, I’ll tell you boys , if we don’t get justice , these motherfuckers are going to get it “Didn't happen because the mob was appeased . Nowhere in my post suggested I said none of that would happen if it were not for riot threats so I assume that you just made something up. The creature that killed those kids in Southport will be tried, sentenced and jailed. Won’t bring the dead children back . The scum bags in Harehill and Manchester got their way .
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 2, 2024 12:51:36 GMT
The removed Roma kids at the centre of the other riot were quickly returned to the family Yes both Harehill and Manchester scumbags were appeased quite quickly . Unfortunately the damage in Southport had already been done ..hence the outrage l You've said you're not saying that those things wouldn't have happened anyway, so calling appeasement is a hell of a stretch.
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 2, 2024 12:52:39 GMT
The creature that killed those kids in Southport will be tried, sentenced and jailed. Won’t bring the dead children back . The scum bags in Harehill and Manchester got their way . Nobody said it will, but if the Southport rioters really wanted justice for the murdered children they will get their way.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 2, 2024 12:55:40 GMT
Yes both Harehill and Manchester scumbags were appeased quite quickly . Unfortunately the damage in Southport had already been done ..hence the outrage l You've said you're not saying that those things wouldn't have happened anyway, so calling appeasement is a hell of a stretch. The Muslim scumbags threatened to riot if they didn’t get their way. They got their way and they didn’t riot . The very dark Romas rioted and stopped when they got their way . It takes a special kind of obtuseness not to understand that was appeasement.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 2, 2024 12:58:28 GMT
Won’t bring the dead children back . The scum bags in Harehill and Manchester got their way . Nobody said it will, but if the Southport rioters really wanted justice for the murdered children they will get their way. Outraged groups of people may not tend to agree with that kind of sentiment .
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 2, 2024 13:00:03 GMT
You've said you're not saying that those things wouldn't have happened anyway, so calling appeasement is a hell of a stretch. The Muslim scumbags threatened to riot if they didn’t get their way. They got their way and they didn’t riot . The very dark Romas rioted and stopped when they got their way . It takes a special kind of obtuseness not to understand that was appeasement. It's only appeasement if it's done in response to riots or the threat of riots. Surely you aren't saying that the Southport killer shouldn't be tried because that would be appeasement to rioters?
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 2, 2024 13:01:32 GMT
Nobody said it will, but if the Southport rioters really wanted justice for the murdered children they will get their way. Outraged groups of people may not tend to agree with that kind of sentiment . Perhaps but it doesn't make it any less true. Would the trial, sentencing and imprisonment of the Southport killer be appeasement of rioters?
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Aug 2, 2024 13:01:52 GMT
Won’t bring the dead children back . The scum bags in Harehill and Manchester got their way . Nobody said it will, but if the Southport rioters really wanted justice for the murdered children they will get their way. I doubt they will get sensible remedial action Ie that the UK civil service stop pouring people into the uk from world's deepest shit-holes
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 2, 2024 13:04:09 GMT
The Muslim scumbags threatened to riot if they didn’t get their way. They got their way and they didn’t riot . The very dark Romas rioted and stopped when they got their way . It takes a special kind of obtuseness not to understand that was appeasement. It's only appeasement if it's done in response to riots or the threat of riots. Surely you aren't saying that the Southport killer shouldn't be tried because that would be appeasement to rioters? Well at least you admit there was appeasement in Harehill and Manchester. Yes surely I’m not . I don’t know how you made that one up 😁
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 2, 2024 13:05:41 GMT
Outraged groups of people may not tend to agree with that kind of sentiment . Perhaps but it doesn't make it any less true. Would the trial, sentencing and imprisonment of the Southport killer be appeasement of rioters? I’m not sure how you managed the mental gymnastics to ask that question . I just hope you didn’t pull a muscle .
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 2, 2024 13:19:27 GMT
Perhaps but it doesn't make it any less true. Would the trial, sentencing and imprisonment of the Southport killer be appeasement of rioters? I’m not sure how you managed the mental gymnastics to ask that question . I just hope you didn’t pull a muscle . The point I'm making is that if the authorities do what the rioters want it's not necessarily appeasement if they would have done it anyway. Therefore the examples you gave aren't necessarily examples of appeasement.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 2, 2024 13:30:31 GMT
I’m not sure how you managed the mental gymnastics to ask that question . I just hope you didn’t pull a muscle . The point I'm making is that if the authorities do what the rioters want it's not necessarily appeasement if they would have done it anyway. Therefore the examples you gave aren't necessarily examples of appeasement. You are not making points . You are posting bollocks on the fly . I repeat “The Muslim scumbags threatened to riot if they didn’t get their way. They got their way and they didn’t riot . The very dark Romas rioted and stopped when they got their way . It takes a special kind of obtuseness not to understand that was appeasement.” You post this absolutely moronic question “Surely you aren't saying that the Southport killer shouldn't be tried because that would be appeasement to rioters?” I can’t respond seriously to this crap…ffs.
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 2, 2024 13:51:59 GMT
The point I'm making is that if the authorities do what the rioters want it's not necessarily appeasement if they would have done it anyway. Therefore the examples you gave aren't necessarily examples of appeasement. You are not making points . You are posting bollocks on the fly . I repeat “The Muslim scumbags threatened to riot if they didn’t get their way. They got their way and they didn’t riot . The very dark Romas rioted and stopped when they got their way . It takes a special kind of obtuseness not to understand that was appeasement.” You post this absolutely moronic question “Surely you aren't saying that the Southport killer shouldn't be tried because that would be appeasement to rioters?” I can’t respond seriously to this crap…ffs. I suspect that you are pretending not to understand. I'll try one more time. Rioters demand the authorities do something which the authorities were going to do anyway, that isn't appeasement because they aren't appeasing the rioters, they are doing what they intended to do anyway. Do you agree?
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 2, 2024 13:57:23 GMT
You are not making points . You are posting bollocks on the fly . I repeat “The Muslim scumbags threatened to riot if they didn’t get their way. They got their way and they didn’t riot . The very dark Romas rioted and stopped when they got their way . It takes a special kind of obtuseness not to understand that was appeasement.” You post this absolutely moronic question “Surely you aren't saying that the Southport killer shouldn't be tried because that would be appeasement to rioters?” I can’t respond seriously to this crap…ffs. I suspect that you are pretending not to understand. I'll try one more time. Rioters demand the authorities do something which the authorities were going to do anyway, that isn't appeasement because they aren't appeasing the rioters, they are doing what they intended to do anyway. Do you agree? I suspect that you are deliberately posting moronic crap and posting “ I suspect that you are pretending not to understand.“ to hide it . So I’ll post this again “The Muslim scumbags threatened to riot if they didn’t get their way. They got their way and they didn’t riot . The very dark Romas rioted and stopped when they got their way . It takes a special kind of obtuseness not to understand that was appeasement.” I can’t reply to nonsense that you pulled out of your arse because it is nonsense that you pulled out of your arse Don’t you agree?
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 2, 2024 14:00:54 GMT
I suspect that you are pretending not to understand. I'll try one more time. Rioters demand the authorities do something which the authorities were going to do anyway, that isn't appeasement because they aren't appeasing the rioters, they are doing what they intended to do anyway. Do you agree? I suspect that you are deliberately posting moronic crap and posting “ I suspect that you are pretending not to understand.“ to hide it . So I’ll post this again “The Muslim scumbags threatened to riot if they didn’t get their way. They got their way and they didn’t riot . The very dark Romas rioted and stopped when they got their way . It takes a special kind of obtuseness not to understand that was appeasement.” I can’t reply to nonsense that you pulled out of your arse because it is nonsense that you pulled out of your arse Don’t you agree? So the authorities should always do the opposite of what rioters want?
|
|