|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jul 25, 2024 10:17:27 GMT
Why cant people simply accept that a man attempted to murder an off duty soldier in the street ?The very first thing that some posters rush to point out is that he's either black or brown, and the second thing they do is speculate ... "he could be a Muslim" "he's probably an asylum seeker" "typical immigrant". Your like those angry mobs which used to go after Frankesteins Monster with pitch forks and torches, lynch mobs, kangaroo courts, whipping up hysteria based on guesswork and speculation. You are the enemy of JUSTICE Because it's not normal to trivialise heinous crimes. Is this want you want our new norm to be like. Just accept it. Say no more and move on? |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Jul 25, 2024 10:22:05 GMT
The attacker attacked the off duty soldier because he is either EVIL or he has Mental Health issues
It has nothing to do with race, and the incident is not been treated as a racist incident, just the same as it is not been treated as a terrorist incident.
But some people try their very best to make it an issue of race ... but fail
|
|
|
|
Post by piglet on Jul 25, 2024 10:22:51 GMT
And we havent discussed racism among the black community. Against other black races.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Jul 25, 2024 10:24:57 GMT
And we havent discussed racism among the black community. Against other black races. Probably because such a subject has no bearing or relation to THIS topic But by all means, go ahead and create such a topic in the appropriate section on these boards |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 25, 2024 10:26:35 GMT
The attacker attacked the off duty soldier because he is either EVIL or he has Mental Health issues It has nothing to do with race, and the incident is not been treated as a racist incident, just the same as it is not been treated as a terrorist incident. But some people try their very best to make it an issue of race ... but fail So explain why this man with 'mental health' issues passed numerous people before he reached the white soldier, you'd have to be a right dumb fuckin nut not know this white solider was the intended target, that is not the actions of someone with mental health issues, that the actions of a racist who has a grudge against white British military. .... get it yet? |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jul 25, 2024 10:27:20 GMT
The attacker attacked the off duty soldier because he is either EVIL or he has Mental Health issues It has nothing to do with race, and the incident is not been treated as a racist incident, just the same as it is not been treated as a terrorist incident. But some people try their very best to make it an issue of race ... but fail
.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07/25/anthony-esan-charged-attempted-murder-soldier-stabbed/ |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 25, 2024 10:29:15 GMT
The attacker attacked the off duty soldier because he is either EVIL or he has Mental Health issues It has nothing to do with race, and the incident is not been treated as a racist incident, just the same as it is not been treated as a terrorist incident. But some people try their very best to make it an issue of race ... but fail And yet we all know that if this had been white on black you and your ilk would be falling over yourselves to do just that. You're a racist hypocrite, fiddles. It's as simple as that. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 25, 2024 10:32:51 GMT
Here's another thing that hasn't gone unnoticed by those of us who know the agenda..... we are already on to it.
The main headlines of every media outlet is focused on the WHITE 'racist' cop at Manchester airport, while this solider who was a attacked by a black racist is now small print ... must think we are fucking stupid.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Jul 25, 2024 10:33:47 GMT
The attacker attacked the off duty soldier because he is either EVIL or he has Mental Health issues It has nothing to do with race, and the incident is not been treated as a racist incident, just the same as it is not been treated as a terrorist incident. But some people try their very best to make it an issue of race ... but fail And yet we all know that if this had been white on black you and your ilk would be falling over yourselves to do just that. You're a racist hypocrite, fiddles. It's as simple as that. Absolutely NOT A white man attacks a black man / a black man attacks a white man Without knowing the details or circumstances, I would never do what you do, jump to conclusions. So once again you are resoundingly wrong and your accusations are without any foundation |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Jul 25, 2024 10:38:11 GMT
Here's another thing that hasn't gone unnoticed by those of us who know the agenda..... we are already on to it. The main headlines of every media outlet is focused on the WHITE 'racist' cop at Manchester airport, while this solider who was a attacked by a black racist is now small print ... must think we are fucking stupid. Explain in your own words why you believe the attacker in Gillingham was a "racist" , upon what evidence ? I never mentioned the separate incident in Manchester, nor would I have done so, but as you yourself have brought it up, what we can safely say with 100% confidence is that the Manchester incident WAS racist, because that information has been disclosed. However, no such detail or information has issued regarding the Gillingham incident |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 25, 2024 10:39:39 GMT
Here's another thing that hasn't gone unnoticed by those of us who know the agenda..... we are already on to it. The main headlines of every media outlet is focused on the WHITE 'racist' cop at Manchester airport, while this solider who was a attacked by a black racist is now small print ... must think we are fucking stupid. Explain in your own words why you believe the attacker in Gillingham was a "racist" , upon what evidence ? I never mentioned the separate incident in Manchester, nor would I have done so, but as you yourself have brought it up, we can safely say with 100% confidence is that the Manchester incident WAS racist, because that information has been disclosed. However, no such detail or information has issued regarding the Gillingham incident I'll explain it when you explain why a cop carrying out his duty detaining a thug who had just broken the nose of a fellow police officer is a racist? That's what they are calling him, but we can't call this black thug a racist because he's black FFS |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Jul 25, 2024 10:42:45 GMT
Explain in your own words why you believe the attacker in Gillingham was a "racist" , upon what evidence ? I never mentioned the separate incident in Manchester, nor would I have done so, but as you yourself have brought it up, we can safely say with 100% confidence is that the Manchester incident WAS racist, because that information has been disclosed. However, no such detail or information has issued regarding the Gillingham incident I'll explain it when you explain why a cop carrying out his duty detaining a thug who had just broken the nose of a fellow police officer is a racist? That's what they are calling him, but we can't call this black thug a racist because he's black FFS Racism played part in police kick incident at Manchester airport, says former senior officer Former Met chief superintendent Dal Babu says footage of man being kicked in face by officer is ‘totally appalling’ www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jul/25/manchester-airport-police-kick-incident-former-senior-met-officerMe thinks you live in Cloud Cuckoo Land |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 25, 2024 10:42:48 GMT
And yet we all know that if this had been white on black you and your ilk would be falling over yourselves to do just that. You're a racist hypocrite, fiddles. It's as simple as that. Absolutely NOT A white man attacks a black man / a black man attacks a white man Without knowing the details or circumstances, I would never do what you do, jump to conclusions. So once again you are resoundingly wrong and your accusations are without any foundation Says the man who, on the other thread, tried to tell us that what we could clearly see wasn't what we could clearly see. 🤣 While your every post on this thread has crept closer and closer to agreement with what I said at the outset. So, if you're that concerned, why not abandon your attempt to spin a false narrative and wait until the trial is concluded? |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jul 25, 2024 10:45:49 GMT
Here's another thing that hasn't gone unnoticed by those of us who know the agenda..... we are already on to it. The main headlines of every media outlet is focused on the WHITE 'racist' cop at Manchester airport, while this solider who was a attacked by a black racist is now small print ... must think we are fucking stupid. Explain in your own words why you believe the attacker in Gillingham was a "racist" , upon what evidence ? I never mentioned the separate incident in Manchester, nor would I have done so, but as you yourself have brought it up, what we can safely say with 100% confidence is that the Manchester incident WAS racist, because that information has been disclosed. However, no such detail or information has issued regarding the Gillingham incident Wow. I know you have a penchant for making stuff up and running away, but where is your evidence this was a racist attack by a police officer? |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Jul 25, 2024 10:46:45 GMT
A false narrative would be to suggest that an attack on an off duty soldier was terror related, when it was not.
A false narrative would be to imply that a black man attacking a white man was a racist attack, when there is no evidence of such.
A false narrative is any kind of deviation from the facts, from reality and the truth.
|
|
