Do labour have a political mandate.

Its not rigged at all everybody has the chance to vote for one person in there
Consitancy.

I leave the labour board to you lol .

Political tearoom forgot that excised
Dont think I ever posted there lol

Labour is likely to use its powers in very inappropriate ways - it is stuffed people with personality disorders and control issues.

They will move to abolish the last parts of our constitution and replace with their 'year zero' solution that can't be repealed. With luck this will corner the British population to take the kind of dramatic action that has been needed for a decade - with a lot of luck though

That's the way elections - and usually referendums too - work. In the GE there were many, many cases of the Reform party coming second to Labour by a few hundred votes. But Labour still won those seats. You only need a margin of 1 vote.

But there is another factor that should be taken into account with the Brexit referendum. There was a built in tendency for people to vote for the status quo in the case of EU membership reckoned to be bout 10%. It's a matter of people being naturally risk adverse. So the margin in the Brexit vote was much more than 4%. But even so 4% is enough for a mandate.

However, you should remember that the Lefties claimed that the "type" of Brexit chosen should reflect the will of the 48%. WHY? Is Starmer going to take into account the fact that 17.4 million voted for Brexit? Of course not. He's hell-bent on reversing Brexit by any means possible. The Left have never really believed in democracy - except when it suits them. 

[/url]


What Ms Harman referred to is contained in a single line of the Bill, tucked away in an obscure schedule about 150 pages in. Here is Schedule 16 (1) in its entirety, with the appropriate text highlighted:




The BNP’s claim to exemption rested upon s.26 of the RRA76, which would be repealed completely when the Equality Act came into force (under the ConLibs as it happened).

[/div]

I will try and answer what I think you asked. The BNP went into decline because they were easy meat for a concerted attack by, call it what you will, the establishment for want of a better phrase and the MSN. People had turned to the BNP not becaseu they specifically liked the policies or the people but that there was a desperation to find something different from NewLabour which had by this time shown they supported, and enacted, mass migration to the UK. Labour had also deserted their core vote in the British working man who at that time could not consider Tory but sought an alternative. The history of the BNP, their leadership, their internal divisions and some policies meant that the MSN could portray them as unacceptable within a democratic/multicultural society and the reporting balanced on the truth and often turned to outright lies in order to discredit and break the party; and it largely worked because as I said teh BNP were easy meat with too many skeletons. The final nails in the coffin of the party were the court cases and then Equality Act which specifically denied the right of ethnic specific associations to be political parties. 
The same tactics are now being used against Reform, which has much less baggage and a much more difficult proposition to defeat. As well as Farage and others are well aware of the tactics that are used against them and are often very precise in how they speak. This of course does not stop the lies and the misrepresentation of what they say and stand for by both politicians and the MSN. 

Does that address your questions?

EDIT I see Dan has beaten me to it.