|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jun 27, 2024 14:15:46 GMT
And you think that stops those of that faith ? I was actually thinking mire Sunak’s tribe though They own the Bookies.. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jun 27, 2024 15:05:09 GMT
Ha ha i knew you thought it was a labour mp no its another bent crooked torie Lol Anyone who bets on themselves be them Tory Labour Lib-dem SNP Reform ..... and complete and utter planks. So why use the term lefty LOL |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 27, 2024 15:12:07 GMT
Anyone who bets on themselves be them Tory Labour Lib-dem SNP Reform ..... and complete and utter planks. So why use the term lefty LOL Because Kevin Craig is a lefty, and was obviously doing all he could to lose so as to win his bet. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jun 27, 2024 15:15:46 GMT
So why use the term lefty LOL Because Kevin Craig is a lefty, and was obviously doing all he could to lose so as to win his bet. But Philip Davies ISNT Lol |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 27, 2024 15:18:38 GMT
Because Kevin Craig is a lefty, and was obviously doing all he could to lose so as to win his bet. But Philip Davies ISNT Lol So what?
Didn't you read my post, any individual who bets against themselves regardless of left or right is a plank.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jun 27, 2024 15:30:58 GMT
But Philip Davies ISNT Lol So what?
Didn't you read my post, any individual who bets against themselves regardless of left or right is a plank.
Only after i pulled you up about your leftish comment. Oh well keep digging Lol |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 27, 2024 15:45:54 GMT
So what?
Didn't you read my post, any individual who bets against themselves regardless of left or right is a plank.
Only after i pulled you up about your leftish comment. Oh well keep digging Lol your posts are getting weirda by the day.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jun 27, 2024 17:56:03 GMT
And you think that stops those of that faith ? I was actually thinking mire Sunak’s tribe though They own the Bookies.. 😂😂😂 |
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Jun 28, 2024 6:28:32 GMT
What a surprise. A lot of people bet - especially when they think they they're on a dead cert. So what. Of course the Gambling Commission would like to make it illegal for people to bet if they know more about what they're betting on than the bookies do. Tough.
The simple fact is that when you arrange an election a vast number of people are involved in making the arrangements. You can't prevent them from betting - there are too many. But you don't need to because the bookies have their own way of handling this. If large numbers of people are betting on a particular result the bookies either adjust the odds to make it not worth betting on or simply refuse to take the bet - or don't pay out. Never feel sorry for a bookie. They're scum who trade on human misery.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jun 28, 2024 7:14:42 GMT
What a surprise. A lot of people bet - especially when they think they they're on a dead cert. So what. Of course the Gambling Commission would like to make it illegal for people to bet if they know more about what they're betting on than the bookies do. Tough. The simple fact is that when you arrange an election a vast number of people are involved in making the arrangements. You can't prevent them from betting - there are too many. But you don't need to because the bookies have their own way of handling this. If large numbers of people are betting on a particular result the bookies either adjust the odds to make it not worth betting on or simply refuse to take the bet - or don't pay out. Never feel sorry for a bookie. They're scum who trade on human misery. I agree with your last sentence but a bookey does not have insider information on dates or who going to win . They are on equal footing to the customers. My god father and is Brother were independent booknakers nice guys friends of my fathers. |
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Jun 28, 2024 9:37:04 GMT
What a surprise. A lot of people bet - especially when they think they they're on a dead cert. So what. Of course the Gambling Commission would like to make it illegal for people to bet if they know more about what they're betting on than the bookies do. Tough. The simple fact is that when you arrange an election a vast number of people are involved in making the arrangements. You can't prevent them from betting - there are too many. But you don't need to because the bookies have their own way of handling this. If large numbers of people are betting on a particular result the bookies either adjust the odds to make it not worth betting on or simply refuse to take the bet - or don't pay out. Never feel sorry for a bookie. They're scum who trade on human misery. I agree with your last sentence but a bookey does not have insider information on dates or who going to win . They are on equal footing to the customers. My god father and is Brother were independent booknakers nice guys friends of my fathers. Bookies have access to vast amounts of information on subjects that they're taking bets on. That's their job. That's why, when the media want to know what's going on, they ask Ladbrooke's for what the odds are. Whether the information is "insider" or "privileged"(as in this case) information we don't know - it would be very hard to find out. But they DO know what people are betting on and you can bet your life that a lot of the public have inside/privileged information. And the bookies use this information to make sure the odds are set so that they almost always make a profit. What they don't like is when people know more than they do. That's why they ban people who consistently take money off them. There's no point in trying to compare this with insider dealing on the stock market. They're two entirely different things. And I'll bet anybody that no one is charged with any crime in this case. Yet that twat Starmer has suspended a candidate for betting on himself. As I worked out when I was at university, the people doing law are NOT very intelligent. All they need is a good memory. They can't think properly. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jun 28, 2024 10:12:26 GMT
I agree with your last sentence but a bookey does not have insider information on dates or who going to win . They are on equal footing to the customers. My god father and is Brother were independent booknakers nice guys friends of my fathers. Bookies have access to vast amounts of information on subjects that they're taking bets on. That's their job. That's why, when the media want to know what's going on, they ask Ladbrooke's for what the odds are. Whether the information is "insider" or "privileged"(as in this case) information we don't know - it would be very hard to find out. But they DO know what people are betting on and you can bet your life that a lot of the public have inside/privileged information. And the bookies use this information to make sure the odds are set so that they almost always make a profit. What they don't like is when people know more than they do. That's why they ban people who consistently take money off them. There's no point in trying to compare this with insider dealing on the stock market. They're two entirely different things. And I'll bet anybody that no one is charged with any crime in this case. Yet that twat Starmer has suspended a candidate for betting on himself. As I worked out when I was at university, the people doing law are NOT very intelligent. All they need is a good memory. They can't think properly. A lot of the odds in Bookies are on varied things the trainers, pedigree ;And performance of the horses they have no inside information.And of course succesful horses are given extra weight |
|
