|
|
Post by sandypine on Jun 24, 2024 13:23:45 GMT
Couple of points; We have not enough room, social services, housing, health care and general infrastructure currently to allow any in, realistically at best it should be severely restricted. We are balancing risk, the risk of criminals arriving to the detriment of the UK population and the risk we deny an innocent illegal migrant the right to stay. It is not always fair but then life seldom is. There is always a majority to be acted upon unfairly, why should that majority be the UK population to be put at higher risk of crime? 1/how much would the population increase by 0.001%? 2/the majority of the Country will benifit. 3/why is there a higher risk of crime. When in general the population has increased but crime fallen over the period of time . So the logic of your points are; 1) the population will not increase by much; so you must have some idea when it will end and how many will arrive? Sharesy. 2) How will the majority of the country benefit, we have no idea what skills they have if any and they will depress wages for ordinary Brits as they take on the jobs at minimum wage. 3) In order to reduce the risk of crime there are many agencies, especially those where working with children is involved, that vet job applicants in terms of criminal records. If we cannot assess a person do you think a) crime is more of a risk or b) less of a risk. If you believe crime has fallen then you are probably one of the only people in the country who believes the stats. 25 years ago I stopped reporting damage and break-ins to my car in a large town in Hampshire, that does not mean they did not happen it just means that reporting them was effectively more trouble than it was worth. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2024 15:38:54 GMT
Seeing Asylum seekers pay 10s of thousabds of pounds to illegally get to the Country . I think it be good to propose a Armistice if thats the right word . For them to see if they can benefit the country . I also proposal that the cant recive state benefits for 3 yrs . Or get soical housing for 5 yrs What you guys think ? Serious discussion please You mean an amnesty, but I am against that, as it rewards criminal behavior. It also encourages more people to do the same thing. Part of the problem in our country is laws that are not being enforced, which from shoplifting to knife crime, need enforcing. Otherwise, what's the point of having laws? Let's just have a free for all. |
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on Jun 24, 2024 16:31:53 GMT
Seeing Asylum seekers pay 10s of thousabds of pounds to illegally get to the Country . I think it be good to propose a Armistice if thats the right word . For them to see if they can benefit the country . I also proposal that the cant recive state benefits for 3 yrs . Or get soical housing for 5 yrs What you guys think ? Serious discussion please So are you suggesting there are a sizeable group that can get out of the boats go to a hotel and book a room using thier own funds or credit card? |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jun 24, 2024 17:50:45 GMT
Seeing Asylum seekers pay 10s of thousabds of pounds to illegally get to the Country . I think it be good to propose a Armistice if thats the right word . For them to see if they can benefit the country . I also proposal that the cant recive state benefits for 3 yrs . Or get soical housing for 5 yrs What you guys think ? Serious discussion please I'm not sure asylum based on how much you can pay would get any approval from the Labour left. I think you misunderstand. Our local lefty wants them in here destroying the place because they are standing there not because they want to pay more to get in |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Jun 25, 2024 9:12:54 GMT
Leftie, killing with kindness is still killing.
Therefore cruel to be kind is the only way.
We have to say to illegal immigrants, sorry but no.
|
|
|
|
Post by borchester on Jun 25, 2024 14:06:02 GMT
Seeing Asylum seekers pay 10s of thousabds of pounds to illegally get to the Country . I think it be good to propose a Armistice if thats the right word . For them to see if they can benefit the country . I also proposal that the cant recive state benefits for 3 yrs . Or get soical housing for 5 yrs What you guys think ? Serious discussion please Sounds good |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 3, 2024 10:22:38 GMT
Seeing Asylum seekers pay 10s of thousabds of pounds to illegally get to the Country . I think it be good to propose a Armistice if thats the right word . For them to see if they can benefit the country . I also proposal that the cant recive state benefits for 3 yrs . Or get soical housing for 5 yrs What you guys think ? Serious discussion please Entering the country illegally should see them get rewarded with being allowed to stay? What next? Paedophiles to be given jobs in primary schools? You don't reward someone for acting illegally, you PUNISH them. If they pay to enter the county illegally they are NOT Asylum seekers; they ARE CRIMINALS and should be treated as such. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 3, 2024 10:24:18 GMT
The no borders people would concrete every field and build houses until there is nothing left to build on. And nothing to eat. Exactly. This country is already Over-Populated. The next wave on international conflicts will be resource wars. We need to be domestically producing at least 90% of our food and energy requirements, or we lose those wars before we even start fighting. All The Best |
|
