|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 15, 2024 15:28:32 GMT
I must have missed the bit where "He claims to have been deprived of SkyTV as a child". Perhaps you can copy and paste it? --"You'd have thought that as he's trying to pretend to be a man of the people". He wasn't he was being a politician. None or what you post means anything other than you are a Rightist doing what comes naturally i.e. denigrating the opposition as best you can. Isn't your google working or maybe labour weekly ''forgot' to include his pretence in their missives to you? Maybe you were having your nap at the time he said he grew up without subscription/Sky TV It didn't even start till he was 27 Quote in quotation marks and in context please, because you comment makes no sense. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 15, 2024 15:30:17 GMT
You must know the difference between Moderate Left, Hard Left and Far-left. If you don't then I suggest you find a Junior Debating Forum. I know that the difference is entirely subjective. NOPE, there is a real difference in the levels of extremism and moderation. |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 15, 2024 15:32:33 GMT
LOL, you're a tad confused, as usual. 'Righties' don't want history cancelled, men in women's sport, children to have the vote, police in rainbow helmets & rainbow cars, diversity quotas, gender ideology taught in schools, etc etc. All this bullshit and more, is what a minority of ideologically deranged authoritarian lefties who have a lot in common with the Hitler Youth insist should be imposed on the vast majority whether they like it or not. I guess you feel better after getting that political crap off your chest. I can see how your confused mind drags you into the mire of Rightist crapology, which places you nearer to authoritarianism than Starmer. If Labour get elected, and if they are successful in their aims you will see a government that pulls people together, i.e. an ending of the 'them and us' that is the very basis of Conservatism. Really? How does your 1984 commie dream square with The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013You know, the designed just for Sir Kier Starmer and nobody else allowed extra special pension scheme |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 15, 2024 16:06:31 GMT
But apparently only one documentary on 'Hitler's Handmaidens'. Which highlights the depth of evil and depravity played by so many females in Nazi Germany. The role of women in Hitlers Germany is well known fully documented and filmed by his propaganda unit at the time Hitler started his ambitions way back in 1919 he fought on the Western Front and was made a Corporal hence his nickname " Little Corporal " Germany lost millions of men the Germans were humiliated by losing the war Germany was bankrupt, due to having to pay reparations for the war. Hitler after being released from Prison was already climbing the ladder to his dream to control the entire population and state bodies every aspect of Germany he started killing people the mentally ill, deformed people , and of course people opposed to his aims, in the 30's when the worldwide depression hit the world the Americans called in the huge loans they had lent Germany, which gave Hitler more control When Hindenburg died Hitler by was in place to take over Germany completely, the rest is history which people of a certain age know 1. Well few things stand still, and there is only one Documentary called 'Hitler's Handmaidens'. 2. Yes, myself and millions of others know of this. 3. Yes, fully understood. But you missed the bit about once Hitler gained power he rounded up socialists and trade unionists and put them in work camps. 4. Hitler at that time had the largest party in the The Reichstag, although he never did get a majority in parliament. As a result of the Nazis’ mass support, German president Paul von Hindenburg appointed Hitler chancellor on January 30, 1933. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 15, 2024 16:17:00 GMT
I guess you feel better after getting that political crap off your chest. I can see how your confused mind drags you into the mire of Rightist crapology, which places you nearer to authoritarianism than Starmer. If Labour get elected, and if they are successful in their aims you will see a government that pulls people together, i.e. an ending of the 'them and us' that is the very basis of Conservatism. Really? How does your 1984 commie dream square with The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013You know, the designed just for Sir Kier Starmer and nobody else allowed extra special pension scheme Why do you start your comment with a juvenile and stupid remark? Your complaint in this situation has nothing to do with my comment. If you have a complaint about Starmer's pension put it in quoted and factual reality so that it can be checked, because I don't trust you or your comments. I know of the Pension for Starmer but I don't know the reasons why or how it was arrived at. And I bet you don't know either. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 15, 2024 16:27:17 GMT
I guess you feel better after getting that political crap off your chest. I can see how your confused mind drags you into the mire of Rightist crapology, which places you nearer to authoritarianism than Starmer. If Labour get elected, and if they are successful in their aims you will see a government that pulls people together, i.e. an ending of the 'them and us' that is the very basis of Conservatism. Jeez, you got it bad. What do you think those who in 1830 chose the name Conservative were concerned about conserving? |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 15, 2024 16:29:22 GMT
an ending of the 'them and us' that is the very basis of Conservatism. Really? How does your 1984 commie dream square with The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013You know, the designed just for Sir Kier Starmer and nobody else allowed extra special pension scheme Why do you start your comment with a juvenile and stupid remark? Your complaint in this situation has nothing to do with my comment. If you have a complaint about Starmer's pension put it in quoted and factual reality so that it can be checked, because I don't trust you or your comments. I know of the Pension for Starmer but I don't know the reasons why or how it was arrived at. And I bet you don't know either. My post started with a direct c&p from your post so any juvenile and stupid remark emanated from your keyboard  You stated that a Keir Starmer government will bring an ending of the 'them and us' that is the very basis of Conservatism.
I'm not complaining , I'm asking you how that fits with Sir Keir Starmer's just for him extra special pension scheme -I know how and why it was created (because he thinks he is 'special' ) as does anyone else who can read . I even gave you the reference of the Statutory Instrument ( How many people get their own name in the title of a specially designed law?) used to give him and nobody else that special just for him special pension and you have the effing cheek to query its veracity. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 15, 2024 16:32:31 GMT
What do you think those who in 1830 chose the name Conservative were concerned about conserving? Tbh, I'm more concerned about the future, but please, continue to worry about events from 200 years ago if you wish. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 15, 2024 16:44:50 GMT
Why do you start your comment with a juvenile and stupid remark? Your complaint in this situation has nothing to do with my comment. If you have a complaint about Starmer's pension put it in quoted and factual reality so that it can be checked, because I don't trust you or your comments. I know of the Pension for Starmer but I don't know the reasons why or how it was arrived at. And I bet you don't know either. My post started with a direct c&p from your post so any juvenile and stupid remark emanated from your keyboard You stated that a Keir Starmer government will bring an ending of the 'them and us' that is the very basis of Conservatism.
I'm not complaining , I'm asking you how that fits with Sir Keir Starmer's just for him extra special pension scheme -I know how and why it was created (because he thinks he is 'special' ) as does anyone else who can read . I even gave you the reference of the Statutory Instrument ( How many people get their own name in the title of a specially designed law?) used to give him and nobody else that special just for him special pension and you have the effing cheek to query its veracity. My comment was about Your comment, not about your c & p from my post. The Conservatives chose the name Conservative in 1830. What do you think they wanted to Conserve in 1830? So you wanted me to do the research, well I have www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65037136 --- Labour says it was standard practice for retiring DPPs to get such a deal. (If the website doesn't open copy and past it in the search line at top of page.) |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 15, 2024 16:53:49 GMT
What do you think those who in 1830 chose the name Conservative were concerned about conserving? Tbh, I'm more concerned about the future, but please, continue to worry about events from 200 years ago if you wish. Avoidance ^^^  |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Jun 15, 2024 17:32:26 GMT
The role of women in Hitlers Germany is well known fully documented and filmed by his propaganda unit at the time Hitler started his ambitions way back in 1919 he fought on the Western Front and was made a Corporal hence his nickname " Little Corporal " Germany lost millions of men the Germans were humiliated by losing the war Germany was bankrupt, due to having to pay reparations for the war. Hitler after being released from Prison was already climbing the ladder to his dream to control the entire population and state bodies every aspect of Germany he started killing people the mentally ill, deformed people , and of course people opposed to his aims, in the 30's when the worldwide depression hit the world the Americans called in the huge loans they had lent Germany, which gave Hitler more control When Hindenburg died Hitler by was in place to take over Germany completely, the rest is history which people of a certain age know 1. Well few things stand still, and there is only one Documentary called 'Hitler's Handmaidens'. 2. Yes, myself and millions of others know of this. 3. Yes, fully understood. But you missed the bit about once Hitler gained power he rounded up socialists and trade unionists and put them in work camps. 4. Hitler at that time had the largest party in the The Reichstag, although he never did get a majority in parliament. As a result of the Nazis’ mass support, German president Paul von Hindenburg appointed Hitler chancellor on January 30, 1933. I suggest you do some in-depth reading, I know what he did and why no matter who they were or what they were , yes he was made Chancellor by Hindenburg in 1933, when he died in 1934 Hitler declared himself jointly president, chancellor and head of the army totally in charge of Germany Leader Fuhrer. Members of the armed forces had to swear a personal oath of allegiance not to Germany, but to Hitler |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 15, 2024 17:42:01 GMT
My post started with a direct c&p from your post so any juvenile and stupid remark emanated from your keyboard You stated that a Keir Starmer government will bring an ending of the 'them and us' that is the very basis of Conservatism.
I'm not complaining , I'm asking you how that fits with Sir Keir Starmer's just for him extra special pension scheme -I know how and why it was created (because he thinks he is 'special' ) as does anyone else who can read . I even gave you the reference of the Statutory Instrument ( How many people get their own name in the title of a specially designed law?) used to give him and nobody else that special just for him special pension and you have the effing cheek to query its veracity. My comment was about Your comment, not about your c & p from my post. The Conservatives chose the name Conservative in 1830. What do you think they wanted to Conserve in 1830? So you wanted me to do the research, well I have www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65037136 --- Labour says it was standard practice for retiring DPPs to get such a deal. (If the website doesn't open copy and past it in the search line at top of page.) Running away again? I knew what the statutory instrument was , I didn't need to research something that is general knowledge for anyone who doesn't believe that labour leaders walk on water I asked how it fits with your stopping them and us prophesy , not how labour glibly tried to brush such hypocrisy aside in a BBC link you've risibly linked. Labour voted against increases for ''us'' You haven't answered |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 15, 2024 17:49:27 GMT
I suggest you do some in-depth reading, I know what he did and why no matter who they were or what they were He cant do any in-depth reading, him and his lefty buddies have burned all the books. |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Jun 15, 2024 17:52:07 GMT
I suggest you do some in-depth reading, I know what he did and why no matter who they were or what they were He cant do any in-depth reading, him and his lefty buddies have burned all the books.  |
|
|
|
Post by Dogburger on Jun 15, 2024 18:20:23 GMT
|
|
