|
Post by Steve on Nov 26, 2022 22:46:46 GMT
The so called 'letters of comfort' were not pardons and it's been ruled that they are not immunities from prosecution either. Really ? I thought the chap wanted for murdering a load of bandsmen and horses was allowed to go untried for the very reason that terrorist apologist and saboteur of sports pitches Peter Hain sent him one such get out of retribution letter. Oh FFS John do I really have to write 'one unique exception (Downey) due to judicial error' in every post? And I suggest check your facts re Peter Hain and Downey
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Nov 26, 2022 22:54:11 GMT
Really ? I thought the chap wanted for murdering a load of bandsmen and horses was allowed to go untried for the very reason that terrorist apologist and saboteur of sports pitches Peter Hain sent him one such get out of retribution letter. You are correct - as the Judge ruled at the time the letter issued by the Labour Government amounted to an amnesty for the Hyde Park attack. And that judge ruled in error following errors by the PSNI as has later been ruled (by Hallett). So while Downey can't be tried he can be sued (and is so being) and no one can use those letters to claim immunity from prosecutions arising from reconsideration of the evidence or new evidence that allows prosecutions to occur.
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Nov 27, 2022 9:31:34 GMT
not according to this article...
if i remember correct , the review by lady justice hallet years later couched things in double speak wich amounted to saying the letters werent an amnesty , and there were systematic failures in what blair and the labour government did , but that the scheme was lawfull.
Details of the subsequent 'OTR letters' only became public in February 2014 when a case against suspected IRA bomber John Downey collapsed at the Old Bailey.
He was due to go on trial charged with killing four soldiers in the 1982 IRA Hyde Park bombing. But he cited an official letter he had received in 2007.
It stated: "There are no warrants in existence, nor are you wanted in Northern Ireland for arrest, questioning or charging by police.
"The Police Service of Northern Ireland are not aware of any interest in you by any other police force."
But he had been mistakenly sent the government letter saying he was not wanted for questioning by police.
Mr Justice Sweeney ruled that Mr Downey, who denied any involvement in the bombing, should not be prosecuted because he was given a guarantee he would not face trial.
The full scale of the administrative scheme involving other republican paramilitary suspects then emerged.
An independent review carried out by Lady Justice Hallett found significant systemic failures but concluded that the letters were not an amnesty and the scheme was lawful.
The Northern Ireland Affairs committee separately concluded that it had damaged the integrity of the criminal justice system.
On the contrary that article backs my position. Remember I said there was one very unique exception, the foul up in the Downey case. You might recall that he's tried to use that to escape further legal cases and has failed. They were not pardons, Downey cock-up excepted they did not give immunity from further trials. How does it back up your position?
The position is the last labour government under blair did dirty deals with terrorists , and the downey trial collapsed because of those dirty deals , four years after labour had been booted out of power.
You wonder why red rackham and the majority of those past and present in the armed forces hate the labour party?
You can argue semantics and twist things limply all day long , but the facts remain. The uk is still dealing with the fallout of the last disasterous labour government in every facet of society.
Labour doing dirty deals behind the bike sheds with terrorists , betraying the people of not just northern ireland , but the armed forces of the uk in the process.
Scum of the highest order.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Nov 27, 2022 10:22:30 GMT
On the contrary that article backs my position. Remember I said there was one very unique exception, the foul up in the Downey case. You might recall that he's tried to use that to escape further legal cases and has failed. They were not pardons, Downey cock-up excepted they did not give immunity from further trials. How does it back up your position? The position is the last labour government under blair did dirty deals with terrorists , and the downey trial collapsed because of those dirty deals , four years after labour had been booted out of power. You wonder why red rackham and the majority of those past and present in the armed forces hate the labour party? You can argue semantics and twist things limply all day long , but the facts remain. The uk is still dealing with the fallout of the last disasterous labour government in every facet of society. Labour doing dirty deals behind the bike sheds with terrorists , betraying the people of not just northern ireland , but the armed forces of the uk in the process. Scum of the highest order.
You mean apart from - The article not saying they were pardons - just like I said
- The article referring to Downey as a one off case - just like I said
- The article saying the letters were under legal review - just like I said (and of course that legal review ruled they were neither amnesties or pardons
I said nothing about whether the letters were a good or bad move.
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Nov 27, 2022 12:48:05 GMT
How does it back up your position? The position is the last labour government under blair did dirty deals with terrorists , and the downey trial collapsed because of those dirty deals , four years after labour had been booted out of power. You wonder why red rackham and the majority of those past and present in the armed forces hate the labour party? You can argue semantics and twist things limply all day long , but the facts remain. The uk is still dealing with the fallout of the last disasterous labour government in every facet of society. Labour doing dirty deals behind the bike sheds with terrorists , betraying the people of not just northern ireland , but the armed forces of the uk in the process. Scum of the highest order.
You mean apart from - The article not saying they were pardons - just like I said
- The article referring to Downey as a one off case - just like I said
- The article saying the letters were under legal review - just like I said (and of course that legal review ruled they were neither amnesties or pardons
I said nothing about whether the letters were a good or bad move. heres what you said earlier in your initial post to me steve.
You can argue semantics all day long , and insinuate they werent letters of pardon all you like , but the fact remains tony blairs labour government gave letters to IRA terrorists which in the case of downey allowed the case against him to collapse in court.
Thats the fact.
Trying to spin otherwise ( very poorly argued i might say) shows how desperate you are . Neither the uk armed forces nor the public forget , and if they do , im here to remind folk.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Nov 27, 2022 18:10:04 GMT
He pulled the trigger, it didn't accidentally go off. His 'defence' that couldn't be disproved was he said he didn't know his own gun was cocked. Guilty You don't 'pull' a trigger ffs. However, what do you know of the fatigue and stress of a tour in Northern Ireland, or being on a static VCP, which was essentially a sitting target. Oh you didn't know that static VCP's were a fave target for IRA snipers? I am surprised, Ha. You armchair experts haven't got a clue. You sit in judgment on people who were in situations you couldn't in a million years even begin to imagine. You have absolutely no concept of what you're talking about it's another world. And the reason you're clueless is because you didn't have the balls to join the forces, yet you feel suitably qualified to judge. I don't know why you bother with the three anti English anti British arseholes; it is highly unlikely that they do not understand why the British Army were sent into NI in the first place. They were sent in to protect the Catholic Community from attacks by Loyalists, the Catholics has been discriminated against for years, the Army was welcomed by them, but the IRA seized the opportunity to target them as well as the RUC, and Prison Officers. I remember the three very young squaddies who off duty and unarmed who went for a pint and were lured into a quite spot by a woman and all three were shot dead. The Army and the RUC were the only ones that had to comply with the Rules of Engagement, the IRA and the Loyalist Paramilitaries had no fecking rules, the Army and RUC took on the gunmen no matter who they were, they took prisoners the IRA did not nor did the Loyalists any Squaddie taken by the IRA were tortured before being executed. Anyone they thought maybe informing on them same thing, to this day many bodies have not been found, their families cannot lay them to rest, no justice for them, If any of them had actually been to the aftermath of a car bombing has seen the bits of bodies all over the place and had to tell their relatives once they could be eventually identified no open coffins, they would really understand how ruthless the IRA and Loyalist were, and they have not gone away, the Bigots on both sides are just not active some are still targeting the PSNI, and anyone connected with the Crown. I could say more but I best not OSA The IRA only came to the table because the Security Services and Military Intelligence, Special Branch had infiltrated the IRA from the top to the bottom, they knew virtually every move they made, as for Blair the warmonger he tried and failed to look as if he had won the peace, the Peace process was started by two women years before he was PM, Maggie Thatcher and Mo Mowlam they started the peace process. Steve does not even understand how our Courts work that the charges were withdrawn as the case again the suspect charged with the Hyde Park Bomb had not got through the Magistrates Court what a load of crap, the CPS can withdraw charges at any time they like, even in the middle of a trial Ater reading to sheer crap the three arseholes have posted in here I for one will not respond to Steve, TotheLeft, and Dappy, they don't live in the real world, I have found another rather pleasant Forum with mature adults that enjoy debate and actually do know what they are on about, I may still post in here but will not respond three muppets
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Nov 27, 2022 18:51:22 GMT
Dodgydave I don't hate isreal im against the over reaction of isreals soldiers. Like shooting dead children for flowing stones and illegal settlement in Palestine land. Has for russia im against war full stop. China ive no opinion on .massacre like tinaman square is a no no . The imprisonment of political opionions is a no no . Besides that I think it seems a wonderful country Wonderful country? lol. The country is fabulous, it's the dictators controlling it that are the problem. Did you forget about the Uyghur genocide? They don't just imprison political opponents; they make them disappear. I suppose you missed them sealing up tower blocks during COVID outbreaks? Did you know what gay people are not allowed on the TV, radio or post on the internet? www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/east-asia/china/report-china/
|
|
|
Post by dappy on Nov 27, 2022 23:10:19 GMT
Whether you choose to post on this forum or not Handyman is of course up to you. If you are more comfortable in your echo chamber elsewhere, post there. It’s a free country.
You are quite right the the IRA the UDF and the splinter groups were violent unpleasant lawless groups. We were the forces of law and order. Their crimes do not justify or excuse our crimes like shooting an unarmed man in the back and, far worse covering it up. It’s no wonder we lost the confidence and support of the Catholic community.
Thatcher had a limited role in bringing peace to Northern Ireland. John Major though should and does get much of the credit. We were lucky that at the critical moment , we had good politicians - Mowlem , Bertie Aherne, George Mitchell and the chemistry between McGuiness and Paisley were all critical to the peace agreement and it’s successful implementation afterwards. But the truth is - inconvenient for some on this forum - the peace would absolutely not have been achieved without the political skills and charisma of Blair at the peak of his powers.
Let us be clear - supporting and excusing unlawful killings by people representing the British state and worse still excusing their cover up is not pro British. It is the diametric opposite. Such behaviour is against the very essence of the values our country stands for. It is right that justice is now being done albeit far far too late.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Nov 27, 2022 23:22:41 GMT
You don't 'pull' a trigger ffs. However, what do you know of the fatigue and stress of a tour in Northern Ireland, or being on a static VCP, which was essentially a sitting target. Oh you didn't know that static VCP's were a fave target for IRA snipers? I am surprised, Ha. You armchair experts haven't got a clue. You sit in judgment on people who were in situations you couldn't in a million years even begin to imagine. You have absolutely no concept of what you're talking about it's another world. And the reason you're clueless is because you didn't have the balls to join the forces, yet you feel suitably qualified to judge. I don't know why you bother with the three anti English anti British arseholes; it is highly unlikely that they do not understand why the British Army were sent into NI in the first place. . . . Oh do fuck off with your delusions and personal attacks all because you don't have the grey matter to actually debate
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Nov 27, 2022 23:30:36 GMT
You mean apart from - The article not saying they were pardons - just like I said
- The article referring to Downey as a one off case - just like I said
- The article saying the letters were under legal review - just like I said (and of course that legal review ruled they were neither amnesties or pardons
I said nothing about whether the letters were a good or bad move. heres what you said earlier in your initial post to me steve.
You can argue semantics all day long , and insinuate they werent letters of pardon all you like , but the fact remains tony blairs labour government gave letters to IRA terrorists which in the case of downey allowed the case against him to collapse in court.
Thats the fact.
Trying to spin otherwise ( very poorly argued i might say) shows how desperate you are . Neither the uk armed forces nor the public forget , and if they do , im here to remind folk.
So you agree I was right to say they were not pardons and I was right to say there was a single unique exception to the principle that the letters did not prevent charges being brought. Maybe you don't understand the MASSIVE difference between a pardon and either early release or an assurance that as of a certain date an individual wasn't being sought. Well I do. In this sad case of David Holden he had the chance to plead guilty in 1988, he chose not to despite knowing he was grossly negligent in pulling the trigger of a gun knowing it was pointed at an unarmed person who died. Had he done so this case would have been long behind him and the relatives of the victim would long have had closure. His choices.
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Nov 28, 2022 7:42:42 GMT
heres what you said earlier in your initial post to me steve.
You can argue semantics all day long , and insinuate they werent letters of pardon all you like , but the fact remains tony blairs labour government gave letters to IRA terrorists which in the case of downey allowed the case against him to collapse in court.
Thats the fact.
Trying to spin otherwise ( very poorly argued i might say) shows how desperate you are . Neither the uk armed forces nor the public forget , and if they do , im here to remind folk.
So you agree I was right to say they were not pardons and I was right to say there was a single unique exception to the principle that the letters did not prevent charges being brought. Maybe you don't understand the MASSIVE difference between a pardon and either early release or an assurance that as of a certain date an individual wasn't being sought. Well I do. In this sad case of David Holden he had the chance to plead guilty in 1988, he chose not to despite knowing he was grossly negligent in pulling the trigger of a gun knowing it was pointed at an unarmed person who died. Had he done so this case would have been long behind him and the relatives of the victim would long have had closure. His choices. You can call it a pardon/amnesty/mistake , whatever you like. It matters not.
The bottom line is a well known IRA suspects court case collapsed because of the actions of Tony blair and the last labour government gave him a get out clause.
You as ever steve are simply wriggling on a hook. Its indefensible.
|
|
|
Post by dappy on Nov 28, 2022 10:11:31 GMT
The bottom line is that as a result of often messy and undesirable compromises, there has been an imperfect peace in Northern ireland for the last quarter century. No doubt many lives have been saved and many many lives improved as a result. Blair's greatest achievement in my view (and very possibly John Major's for his part too)
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Nov 28, 2022 11:45:29 GMT
So you agree I was right to say they were not pardons and I was right to say there was a single unique exception to the principle that the letters did not prevent charges being brought. Maybe you don't understand the MASSIVE difference between a pardon and either early release or an assurance that as of a certain date an individual wasn't being sought. Well I do. In this sad case of David Holden he had the chance to plead guilty in 1988, he chose not to despite knowing he was grossly negligent in pulling the trigger of a gun knowing it was pointed at an unarmed person who died. Had he done so this case would have been long behind him and the relatives of the victim would long have had closure. His choices. You can call it a pardon/amnesty/mistake , whatever you like. It matters not.
The bottom line is a well known IRA suspects court case collapsed because of the actions of Tony blair and the last labour government gave him a get out clause.
You as ever steve are simply wriggling on a hook. Its indefensible.
So according to you it's indefensible to want to see the truth Well you carry on living in planet bullshit and I'll keep laughing at you. A pardon is massively different from a 'letter of comfort', last time I looked Tony Blair was never in the Police Service of Northern Ireland that effed up over Downey and Downey was a one off unique case that has been definitely ruled as that very PSNI cock-up. You wish to suppose it's some sort of general rule if you like but you will be posting bullshit. You might of course want to read up on the facts assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/335206/41003_Hallett_Web_Accessible.pdf'2.9 The Operation Rapid police report upon which the letter of assurance to Mr Downey was
ultimately based failed to disclose the fact that Mr Downey was ‘wanted’ by the Metropolitan
Police Service. I have been given no satisfactory explanation for this failure by the Police
Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI). Members of the Operation Rapid team were aware that
notifications of status were being provided, even if they did not know the precise details.
2.10 The error in Mr Downey’s case was compounded by the fact that the PSNI realised their
mistake in 2008 yet did nothing to correct it or at least check what assurance had been given
about his status'
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Nov 28, 2022 13:22:32 GMT
So you agree I was right to say they were not pardons and I was right to say there was a single unique exception to the principle that the letters did not prevent charges being brought. Maybe you don't understand the MASSIVE difference between a pardon and either early release or an assurance that as of a certain date an individual wasn't being sought. Well I do. In this sad case of David Holden he had the chance to plead guilty in 1988, he chose not to despite knowing he was grossly negligent in pulling the trigger of a gun knowing it was pointed at an unarmed person who died. Had he done so this case would have been long behind him and the relatives of the victim would long have had closure. His choices. You can call it a pardon/amnesty/mistake , whatever you like. It matters not.
The bottom line is a well known IRA suspects court case collapsed because of the actions of Tony blair and the last labour government gave him a get out clause.
You as ever steve are simply wriggling on a hook. Its indefensible.
You are correct Thomas; the pardons were signed by the late Queen it was discussed at length in the Commons back in 2014 here is just one account in media back then IRA terrorists were among hundreds of people in Northern Ireland to receive royal pardons signed by the Queen, MPs were told yesterday. Northern Ireland Secretary Theresa Villiers revealed that the royal prerogative of mercy was exercised in the province at least 365 times between 1979 and 2002. The true total will be much higher, since the Northern Ireland Office claims records for the ten-year period between 1987 and 1997 have gone missing. Critics now say there appears to have been a ‘cover-up’ over the use of amnesties, issued by the Queen on the advice of ministers. The bulk of the cases – 347 – from the period 1979 to 1986 are non-terrorism related and predate the peace process. A number are thought to have been handed to loyalist and republican ‘super-grasses’ who gave key evidence at court cases during the Troubles. However, it is believed that around 10 per cent of the earlier pardons – and the majority of those issued under Tony Blair’s government between 1997 and 2002 – did relate to terror offences.
In this period, royal pardons were granted to escaped IRA terrorists as part of the Northern Ireland peace deal. Among those to benefit were Angelo Fusco, Paul Patrick Magee and Robert Campbell who were convicted for their part in the murder of SAS Captain Herbert Westmacott but were among a group who escaped from a north Belfast jail in June 1981. Former Labour minister Kate Hoey, who uncovered the pardon figures via Parliamentary questions, suggested the Queen had been put in an ‘invidious’ position. ‘I want to know who all these people are. I think that the public will want to know,’ she said. She asked why the pardons had apparently not been listed in official government journals, the Belfast Gazette or the London Gazette, as would normally be the case. Miss Hoey also insisted that the Government must explain how a decade of records covering a key period, during which John Major’s administration was advancing the peace process, could have vanished. As far as I am aware no such Pardons were offered to former NI Police Officers or former Squaddies who are suspected of committing criminal offences during the troubles,
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Nov 28, 2022 15:35:31 GMT
|
|