Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2024 12:45:22 GMT
GB News is a news outlet that isn't pretending to be anything it isn't. The reason you hate it is because it isn't another Marxist-Islamist shitshow. I don't hate it, I just see it for what it obviously is, just as the Guardian has an obvious left wing bias. The Guardian is a cheap rag. There's no comparison. GB News interviews all sorts of people and allows everyone the chance to argue their points. That's fact. This obviously troubles you, and would trouble Starmer, who relies on cuecards. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 25, 2024 12:46:07 GMT
In a post above you claim that Sunak is ''dithering'' - yet here you state that he has ''yet to confirm'' That's two different things In lefty world you'd claim that inviting someone who states ''I need to check my diary first'' is ''dithering''? Or does it depend on whether you are in political agreement with them , in which case it's ''fine let me know when you can''? I said he appears to be, I'll happily stand corrected if I've misread the situation. That's all you do hh. Just dither like starmer does.. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on May 25, 2024 12:53:25 GMT
I said he appears to be, I'll happily stand corrected if I've misread the situation. That's all you do hh. Just dither like starmer does.. And all you do is ad-homs. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on May 25, 2024 12:55:19 GMT
I don't hate it, I just see it for what it obviously is, just as the Guardian has an obvious left wing bias. The Guardian is a cheap rag. There's no comparison. GB News interviews all sorts of people and allows everyone the chance to argue their points. That's fact. This obviously troubles you, and would trouble Starmer, who relies on cuecards. Like I said they have Tory MPs as presenters and have had Tory MPs interviewing other Tory MPs. If you like it good for you but I can't take anyone seriously if they argue GB News is even vaguely balanced. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 25, 2024 13:00:22 GMT
The Guardian is a cheap rag. There's no comparison. GB News interviews all sorts of people and allows everyone the chance to argue their points. That's fact. This obviously troubles you, and would trouble Starmer, who relies on cuecards. Like I said they have Tory MPs as presenters and have had Tory MPs interviewing other Tory MPs. If you like it good for you but I can't take anyone seriously if they argue GB News is even vaguely balanced. He could insist that the interviewer wasn’t a Tory MP. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on May 25, 2024 13:04:48 GMT
Like I said they have Tory MPs as presenters and have had Tory MPs interviewing other Tory MPs. If you like it good for you but I can't take anyone seriously if they argue GB News is even vaguely balanced. He could insist that the interviewer wasn’t a Tory MP. He could do but the Tory MPs on the payroll are indicitive of a clear and obvious bias. I suspect if Keir Starmer cured cancer GB News would find a way to put a negative spin on it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2024 13:12:48 GMT
He could insist that the interviewer wasn’t a Tory MP. He could do but the Tory MPs on the payroll are indicitive of a clear and obvious bias. I suspect if Keir Starmer cured cancer GB News would find a way to put a negative spin on it. So, the truth is that it's you who is bias and extreme, which is why you have to make things up. Starmer drops to his knees to racialist Marxist pro-Hamas international movements and believes, like you, that woman can have dicks. Yet, he can't even be man enough to stand in front of the British people?
It isn't GB News that is the problem here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 25, 2024 13:13:20 GMT
He could insist that the interviewer wasn’t a Tory MP. He could do but the Tory MPs on the payroll are indicitive of a clear and obvious bias. I suspect if Keir Starmer cured cancer GB News would find a way to put a negative spin on it. The Tory MPs on the payroll are not seasoned interviewers . They are also part of or used to be part of a failing government. Starmer is not only a barrister but a KC and ex DPP. If he can’t argue his case against a Tory MP with little experience as a interviewer , it tells us a great deal about him. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 25, 2024 13:14:21 GMT
He could do but the Tory MPs on the payroll are indicitive of a clear and obvious bias. I suspect if Keir Starmer cured cancer GB News would find a way to put a negative spin on it. So, the truth is that it's you who is bias and extreme, which is why you have to make things up. Starmer drops to his knees to racialist Marxist pro-Hamas international movements and believes, like you, that woman can have dicks. Yet, he can't even be man enough to stand in front of the British people?
It isn't GB News that is the problem here.
Indeed. His Leftie followers want to cotton wool him . |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on May 25, 2024 13:16:40 GMT
And I see once again certain posters resorting to ad-homs.
Or "conceding defeat" as its otherwise known in debating circles.
|
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on May 25, 2024 13:18:07 GMT
He could do but the Tory MPs on the payroll are indicitive of a clear and obvious bias. I suspect if Keir Starmer cured cancer GB News would find a way to put a negative spin on it. The Tory MPs on the payroll are not seasoned interviewers . They are also part of or used to be part of a failing government. Starmer is not only a barrister but a KC and ex DPP. If he can’t argue his case against a Tory MP with little experience as a interviewer , it tells us a great deal about him. It's obviously not a serious news station, it's a propaganda outlet, that I suspect is why Starmer doesn't want anything to do with them, they're a Mickey Mouse outfit. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 25, 2024 13:19:04 GMT
That's all you do hh. Just dither like starmer does.. And all you do is ad-homs. Ah bless. If you can't take it don't give it out then.. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 25, 2024 13:20:03 GMT
And I see once again certain posters resorting to ad-homs. Or "conceding defeat" as its otherwise known in debating circles. What ad-homs would that be hh? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 25, 2024 13:20:48 GMT
The Tory MPs on the payroll are not seasoned interviewers . They are also part of or used to be part of a failing government. Starmer is not only a barrister but a KC and ex DPP. If he can’t argue his case against a Tory MP with little experience as a interviewer , it tells us a great deal about him. , it's a propaganda outlet, that I suspect is why Starmer doesn't want anything to do with them, they're a Mickey Mouse outfit. States a brainwashed lefty....LOL |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 25, 2024 13:21:09 GMT
The Tory MPs on the payroll are not seasoned interviewers . They are also part of or used to be part of a failing government. Starmer is not only a barrister but a KC and ex DPP. If he can’t argue his case against a Tory MP with little experience as a interviewer , it tells us a great deal about him. It's obviously not a serious news station, it's a propaganda outlet, that I suspect is why Starmer doesn't want anything to do with them, they're a Mickey Mouse outfit. Starmer must be a Mickey Mouse KC and ex DPP if he can’t best a Tory MP interviewing him. |
|
