|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 13, 2024 22:32:36 GMT
You only got to look at yours and jonsky post to see about crime lol Quite so. It's a crime that I'm so understanding of thick inexperienced left wing pillocks. But hey, I've always been sympathetic to the less fortunate. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 14, 2024 1:33:02 GMT
You only got to look at yours and jonsky post to see about crime lol Quite so. It's a crime that I'm so understanding of thick inexperienced left wing pillocks. But hey, I've always been sympathetic to the less fortunate. What do you mean by inexperienced Red i |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 14, 2024 1:53:25 GMT
Quite so. It's a crime that I'm so understanding of thick inexperienced left wing pillocks. But hey, I've always been sympathetic to the less fortunate. What do you mean by inexperienced Red i What do I mean by inexperienced?.. Well I suppose you could google inexperienced, if that doesn't help click on synonyms. That's what I mean by inexperienced. Charlie in my experience, experience comes with age and I know how old you are, which is why I'm surprised you're a lefty. Don't get me wrong, we've all been there, I was a lefty for years. Not a hard core lefty but certainly someone who had lefty sympathies. But like most lefties I grew up, it's inevitable. Sooner or later everyone grows up. The reality of demonstrating for foreign causes is trendy for kids who have no life experience. But it doesn't last, it never does. Which is why the left, both Labour and the LibDems want ballot boxes in schools. Incredible. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 14, 2024 2:52:06 GMT
What do you mean by inexperienced Red i What do I mean by inexperienced?.. Well I suppose you could google inexperienced, if that doesn't help click on synonyms. That's what I mean by inexperienced. Charlie in my experience, experience comes with age and I know how old you are, which is why I'm surprised you're a lefty. Don't get me wrong, we've all been there, I was a lefty for years. Not a hard core lefty but certainly someone who had lefty sympathies. But like most lefties I grew up, it's inevitable. Sooner or later everyone grows up. The reality of demonstrating for foreign causes is trendy for kids who have no life experience. But it doesn't last, it never does. Which is why the left, both Labour and the LibDems want ballot boxes in schools. Incredible. I think all the lefties on here Red are older than kids . I say 50+ We lefties keep our facilities when we get older lol . |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 14, 2024 3:02:13 GMT
What do I mean by inexperienced?.. Well I suppose you could google inexperienced, if that doesn't help click on synonyms. That's what I mean by inexperienced. Charlie in my experience, experience comes with age and I know how old you are, which is why I'm surprised you're a lefty. Don't get me wrong, we've all been there, I was a lefty for years. Not a hard core lefty but certainly someone who had lefty sympathies. But like most lefties I grew up, it's inevitable. Sooner or later everyone grows up. The reality of demonstrating for foreign causes is trendy for kids who have no life experience. But it doesn't last, it never does. Which is why the left, both Labour and the LibDems want ballot boxes in schools. Incredible. I think all the lefties on here Red are older than kids . I say 50+ We lefties keep our facilities when we get older lol . Compared with the population at large, you could stand the population of this forum on a pinhead. It's no secret that people become more conservative as they grow older. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 14, 2024 3:05:05 GMT
More self centenRd yes
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 23, 2024 7:16:44 GMT
open borders working well..
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on May 23, 2024 8:48:57 GMT
Compared with the population at large, you could stand the population of this forum on a pinhead. It's no secret that people become more conservative as they grow older. Indeed it isn't. Eatwell and Goodwin cite an Oxford study which confirms their theory of a slow but steady drift 'rightwards' amongst the population as a whole. Per the study we become 0.38% more conservative each year, which over a long period of time is enough to account for the difference in support for Conservative policies between new, young voters and those of retirement age.
Note I wrote 'policies' not 'Party'.
Source: National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy, p14ff
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on May 23, 2024 10:36:24 GMT
Civil servants want to block such a scheme ? ... what could the reason be
Because Xenophobes and racists will attempt to use the data to further their ignorant views, that a dirty foreigner is much more likely to be a criminal because ..... they are foreign, or black, or Asian, or a dirty rotten Muslim.
And all the thicko's from the Berwick to Landsend will believe such shite, and Reform UK will jump on the data and USE IT to further their hatred, which could cause some real problems in society.
A certain political movement ( name barred on here ) from 1930s Germany indulged in the very same activities, and decent people dont want it here in Britain in the 21st century.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on May 23, 2024 10:40:31 GMT
But what if the data reinforces their 'ignorant views' which then turn out to have been correct? Should it be suppressed just for that reason?
Or are you saying the data should not be made public, whether or not it reinforces such views? If so, can you explain why without invoking Godwin's Law?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 23, 2024 11:21:02 GMT
Civil servants want to block such a scheme ? ... what could the reason be Because Xenophobes and racists will attempt to use the data to further their ignorant views, that a dirty foreigner is much more likely to be a criminal because ..... they are foreign, or black, or Asian, or a dirty rotten Muslim. If you were not certain that these 'ignorant views' were correct you wouldn't be so keen to block the publication of the stats. |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on May 23, 2024 15:51:12 GMT
But what if the data reinforces their 'ignorant views' which then turn out to have been correct? Should it be suppressed just for that reason? Or are you saying the data should not be made public, whether or not it reinforces such views? If so, can you explain why without invoking Godwin's Law? Because ther is no possible biologial, rational or scientific reason which backs up any argument or conclusion that a person who's skin pigment is dark or black is more liable to be criminaly minded. There is also no logical or sane argument that a person of a specific, or particular faith is more liable to be a criminal, its like saying people with brown hair are more likely to commit a crime as opposed to people with fair hair. Its just nonsense |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on May 23, 2024 15:53:04 GMT
Civil servants want to block such a scheme ? ... what could the reason be Because Xenophobes and racists will attempt to use the data to further their ignorant views, that a dirty foreigner is much more likely to be a criminal because ..... they are foreign, or black, or Asian, or a dirty rotten Muslim. If you were not certain that these 'ignorant views' were correct you wouldn't be so keen to block the publication of the stats. I refer you to my answer above |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 23, 2024 15:57:06 GMT
But what if the data reinforces their 'ignorant views' which then turn out to have been correct? Should it be suppressed just for that reason? Or are you saying the data should not be made public, whether or not it reinforces such views? If so, can you explain why without invoking Godwin's Law? Because ther is no possible biologial, rational or scientific reason which backs up any argument or conclusion that a person who's skin pigment is dark or black is more liable to be criminaly minded. There is also no logical or sane argument that a person of a specific, or particular faith is more liable to be a criminal, its like saying people with brown hair are more likely to commit a crime as opposed to people with fair hair. Its just nonsense I am afraid there is very much data to support differences in criminality amongst different racial groups, much is disputed but usually without good scientific or biological reasons other than your plain denial it is so. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 23, 2024 16:07:54 GMT
But what if the data reinforces their 'ignorant views' which then turn out to have been correct? Should it be suppressed just for that reason? Or are you saying the data should not be made public, whether or not it reinforces such views? If so, can you explain why without invoking Godwin's Law? Because ther is no possible biologial, rational or scientific reason which backs up any argument or conclusion that a person who's skin pigment is dark or black is more liable to be criminaly minded. There is also no logical or sane argument that a person of a specific, or particular faith is more liable to be a criminal, its like saying people with brown hair are more likely to commit a crime as opposed to people with fair hair. Its just nonsense Why should the public (and parliament) not have all the information when it comes to who to allow into the country?. For example other countries do publish these stats and show that a majority of rapes are carried out by migrants - information that can be used to help assist in determining the level of migration. |
|
