|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 7, 2024 10:11:22 GMT
Ridicule: the last refuge of someone with no tangible arguments. Well done, thanks for conceding the ground. All The Best Does that require a yes or no response? |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on May 7, 2024 10:39:37 GMT
Ridicule: the last refuge of someone with no tangible arguments. Well done, thanks for conceding the ground. All The Best Does that require a yes or no response? Neither, its a fact - as demonstrated by your post. No cogent argument left so you resort to ridicule. If you were half as clever as you seemingly think you are you'd concede the point and stop digging - pretty soon, if it is not already, that hole is going to be too big for you to climb out of. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 7, 2024 11:33:55 GMT
Does that require a yes or no response? Neither, its a fact - as demonstrated by your post. No cogent argument left so you resort to ridicule. If you were half as clever as you seemingly think you are you'd concede the point and stop digging - pretty soon, if it is not already, that hole is going to be too big for you to climb out of. All The Best No |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 7, 2024 18:57:34 GMT
No they did not, they restricted the powers of both the Monarch and the House of Lords. Charles 2 thought he was God on earth in terms of powers but the removal of his head quickly disabused him of that belief, the Lords wished total control to veto bills and in the end had to give way through compromise and negotiation. Resolutions come about through fair means and foul. If you believe we have the status quo from 300 odd years ago then you are just plain wrong. In order to have a power then it must be exercised once in a while with no consequence. Charles 2 tried and failed, the Lords tried and failed; what is the betting? This is a falsehood. Once does not have to use a power to retain the choice to use that power at some other time. All The Best Not so, having a power must be a known thing otherwise it is a belief in having a power. If it is not exercised then its use, the consequences of its use and the reaction of those against whom it is used are unknowns and in terms of having a power if the exercise of it leads to catastrophe for oneself and what you tried to stop is enacted anyway it is not really an actual power. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 7, 2024 19:00:28 GMT
Indeed. He could post “ I could shag Dua Lipa” and it’s true . There is less than zero chance of that happening . Then he could insist that anyone who doubts it answer this question “ Could I shag Dua Lipa …Yes or No?”…and insist he is really clever and everyone else is stupid .😁 Well, I have never shagged Dua Lipa; the Monarch has, in the past, refused to grant Royal Assent. Someone who was clever, who was not stupid, would recognise therefore that your analogy is fundamentally flawed. Just on case you need help here: Definition: Fundamentally and Definition: AnalogyAll The Best Nope.Anyone who was clever , who was not stupid, wouid recognise the analogy was fine . Dua Lipa has , in the past , been shagged . So it must be you that’s stupid then 👍 Just in case you need help : dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/stupid |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on May 7, 2024 19:04:48 GMT
This is a falsehood. Once does not have to use a power to retain the choice to use that power at some other time. All The Best Not so, having a power must be a known thing otherwise it is a belief in having a power. Utter rubbish. I have, literally, never seen such an utterly moronic argument in all my life. Do you even understand the basics of the English Language and English Law. The Police do NOT need to periodically arrest me for me to know they have the power to do so. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 7, 2024 19:06:58 GMT
Ridicule: the last refuge of someone with no tangible arguments. Well done, thanks for conceding the ground. All The Best Not necessarily. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 7, 2024 19:07:36 GMT
Not so, having a power must be a known thing otherwise it is a belief in having a power. Utter rubbish. I have, literally, never seen such an utterly moronic argument in all my life. Do you even understand the basics of the English Language and English Law. The Police do NOT need to periodically arrest me for me to know they have the power to do so. All The Best No |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 7, 2024 19:10:16 GMT
Ridicule: the last refuge of someone with no tangible arguments. Well done, thanks for conceding the ground. All The Best Not necessarily. Not suggesting what others posters should follow, but as of now my response to PV is of a simple yes or no that he demands, may I suggest other posters respond in kind with a simple yes or no response to PV |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 7, 2024 19:17:14 GMT
Not so, having a power must be a known thing otherwise it is a belief in having a power. Utter rubbish. I have, literally, never seen such an utterly moronic argument in all my life. Do you even understand the basics of the English Language and English Law. The Police do NOT need to periodically arrest me for me to know they have the power to do so. All The Best However we are not dealing with a power of arrest which is exercised many times daily and is a proven power with no counter consequences that work against that power. It is well known it is a power that exists and can be exercised on any individual. You have wandered into the untested domain of a power that exists in abstract form as it has not been exercised in any way that is meaningful so it exists but the consequences of exercising it are unknown. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on May 7, 2024 19:24:22 GMT
Not suggesting what others posters should follow, but as of now my response to PV is of a simple yes or no that he demands, may I suggest other posters respond in kind with a simple yes or no response to PV You want other posters to be as dishonest and dumb as you? I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy... All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on May 7, 2024 19:26:06 GMT
Utter rubbish. I have, literally, never seen such an utterly moronic argument in all my life. Do you even understand the basics of the English Language and English Law. The Police do NOT need to periodically arrest me for me to know they have the power to do so. All The Best However we are not dealing with a power of arrest which is exercised many times daily and is a proven power with no counter consequences that work against that power. It is well known it is a power that exists and can be exercised on any individual. You have wandered into the untested domain of a power that exists in abstract form as it has not been exercised in any way that is meaningful so it exists but the consequences of exercising it are unknown. But it has. Previous Monarchs HAVE refused to grant Royal Assent. Since those times NO CHANGES AT ALL have been made to Royal Assent. Ergo Royal Assent remains as it was when previously used. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 8, 2024 7:26:58 GMT
Not suggesting what others posters should follow, but as of now my response to PV is of a simple yes or no that he demands, may I suggest other posters respond in kind with a simple yes or no response to PV You want other posters to be as dishonest and dumb as you? I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy... All The Best No |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 8, 2024 8:33:38 GMT
However we are not dealing with a power of arrest which is exercised many times daily and is a proven power with no counter consequences that work against that power. It is well known it is a power that exists and can be exercised on any individual. You have wandered into the untested domain of a power that exists in abstract form as it has not been exercised in any way that is meaningful so it exists but the consequences of exercising it are unknown. But it has. Previous Monarchs HAVE refused to grant Royal Assent. Since those times NO CHANGES AT ALL have been made to Royal Assent. Ergo Royal Assent remains as it was when previously used. All The Best When was it exercised and in what circumstances? |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on May 8, 2024 8:49:49 GMT
|
|
