|
|
Post by om15 on Dec 3, 2022 13:39:21 GMT
For any readers that are confused about the situation regarding the missing money and current ongoing Police criminal investigation the full details can be found here, www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23157103.probe-snps-missing-600-000-ongoing/The outraged readers comments are of interest, the shrill denials from the Murrells of any wrongdoing are getting short shrift, especially from those who donated to the disappeared fund. |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Dec 3, 2022 13:39:31 GMT
Yes I am accusing you of waffling. Did you work that out all by yourself. I have read the post very carefully and I am dammed if I can see what I confirmed. Would you care to tell me what I was supposed to confirm No. I “worked out all by myself” the irony of you accusing me of waffling . Your inability to read a post ( or the posts that put it into perspective)is not my problem . OK. Let me repeat what I said and here it is verbatin. .. Well the UK government cares. It is spending billions of your money and refuses to say how much under the FOI act. To destroy the elected FM of Scotland. Nagging shrew of a wife that constantly rants it is voluntary. Just like you arfe doing. Sunak was elected as PM by nobody. It has just cost you and me some £71,00 for the UK government to be told by the Supreme Court, what it did not want to hear. The Union is not voluntary. On top of that. Once Scotland does go its merry way. England with the worst economy in the developed world, only Russia will beat that. Will have to at a minimum borrow £100 billion more than it does now. Just to stand still. You do know if it had not been for the Scottish economy in 1976 and SWcotland had been on its merry own. England would still be a bankrupt economic third world basket case in the hands of the IMF. The sick man of Europe where it is heading now. Dragging energy rich Scotland with it. The laughable bit. Johnston promoted himself Minister of the Union. FFS you could not make it up.So you are confirming that you were wrong when you said nobody in England and Wales cares if Scotland leaves the Union. That is what you said. . As the UK government spent £71,000 on the Supreme court producing a finding that the Union is not voluntary. To keep Scotland in the Union. Lets just say your idea of not caring is different from mine. You are also confirming that bankrupt England has the worst economy in the developed world, surpassed only by Russia and dragging Scotland with it. You are also confirming that Sunak was elected by nobody as PM. You are confirming that if Scotland had been on its merry own in 1976. England would still be a bankrupt economic third world basket case economy in the hands of the IMF. The sick man of Europe where it is heading now. Dragging energy rich Scotland with it. Well I am glad you confirmed what I said and sorts that out. And in the link below is the response from me to you. I am pleased to hear you confirmed it. ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/post/25367/thread |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Dec 3, 2022 13:56:44 GMT
For any readers that are confused about the situation regarding the missing money and current ongoing Police criminal investigation the full details can be found here, www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23157103.probe-snps-missing-600-000-ongoing/The outraged readers comments are of interest, the shrill denials from the Murrells of any wrongdoing are getting short shrift, especially from those who donated to the disappeared fund. Would you care to point out after 4 years where the current on going Police Criminal enquiry is Current. Which part of Police Scotland previously stated that a fraud allegation relating to the funds was “still being assessed to determine if an investigation is required”.. Translates to you it is ongoing. With the rant of the Unionist clowns to return the money. I think you should be looking at the gangster money donated to them. Two things. If it is missing and stolen by the Murrals, that is what you said, which is it. And any case how can something that is not there be returned. The second point. Who do they return it to. It was raised by raffles and the like. Which part of The finances of the SNP are independently audited, accounts are sent to the Electoral Commission in common with other parties and of course published, so there’s full scrutiny around that.” Do you not understand. So stop ranting utter garbage and the copy and paste has not changed since the last time I posted it. And it is not £6 million as in your idiotic post. You cannot even get that right. Now I have a better idea as I told you before. How about you writing to Police Scotland and tell them you have evidence the FM stole the money. I forgot. D.Ross ranted they were on strike. And your link matey the rants were coming from the Unionist clowns and like you have found the Murrals guilty. And there is nothing to stop the Scottish Government from holding a referendum. That is a devolved matter. The Scottish Government can hold as many as it likes. In the case of a indy ref. The supreme court has made it clear the Union is not voluntary. In the event of one being carried out. Legal or illegal does not matter one jot. It is the outcome that counts. www.parliament.scot/bills-and-laws/bills/referendums-scotland-bill |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 3, 2022 14:09:09 GMT
No. I “worked out all by myself” the irony of you accusing me of waffling . Your inability to read a post ( or the posts that put it into perspective)is not my problem . OK. Let me repeat what I said and here it is verbatin. .. Well the UK government cares. It is spending billions of your money and refuses to say how much under the FOI act. To destroy the elected FM of Scotland. Nagging shrew of a wife that constantly rants it is voluntary. Just like you arfe doing. Sunak was elected as PM by nobody. It has just cost you and me some £71,00 for the UK government to be told by the Supreme Court, what it did not want to hear. The Union is not voluntary. On top of that. Once Scotland does go its merry way. England with the worst economy in the developed world, only Russia will beat that. Will have to at a minimum borrow £100 billion more than it does now. Just to stand still. You do know if it had not been for the Scottish economy in 1976 and SWcotland had been on its merry own. England would still be a bankrupt economic third world basket case in the hands of the IMF. The sick man of Europe where it is heading now. Dragging energy rich Scotland with it. The laughable bit. Johnston promoted himself Minister of the Union. FFS you could not make it up.So you are confirming that you were wrong when you said nobody in England and Wales cares if Scotland leaves the Union. That is what you said. . As the UK government spent £71,000 on the Supreme court producing a finding that the Union is not voluntary. To keep Scotland in the Union. Lets just say your idea of not caring is different from mine. You are also confirming that bankrupt England has the worst economy in the developed world, surpassed only by Russia and dragging Scotland with it. You are also confirming that Sunak was elected by nobody as PM. You are confirming that if Scotland had been on its merry own in 1976. England would still be a bankrupt economic third world basket case economy in the hands of the IMF. The sick man of Europe where it is heading now. Dragging energy rich Scotland with it. Well I am glad you confirmed what I said and sorts that out. And in the link below is the response from me to you. I am pleased to hear you confirmed it. ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/post/25367/thread I have to hand it to you . You never fail to amuse .😉 |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Dec 3, 2022 14:15:11 GMT
OK. Let me repeat what I said and here it is verbatin. .. Well the UK government cares. It is spending billions of your money and refuses to say how much under the FOI act. To destroy the elected FM of Scotland. Nagging shrew of a wife that constantly rants it is voluntary. Just like you arfe doing. Sunak was elected as PM by nobody. It has just cost you and me some £71,00 for the UK government to be told by the Supreme Court, what it did not want to hear. The Union is not voluntary. On top of that. Once Scotland does go its merry way. England with the worst economy in the developed world, only Russia will beat that. Will have to at a minimum borrow £100 billion more than it does now. Just to stand still. You do know if it had not been for the Scottish economy in 1976 and SWcotland had been on its merry own. England would still be a bankrupt economic third world basket case in the hands of the IMF. The sick man of Europe where it is heading now. Dragging energy rich Scotland with it. The laughable bit. Johnston promoted himself Minister of the Union. FFS you could not make it up.So you are confirming that you were wrong when you said nobody in England and Wales cares if Scotland leaves the Union. That is what you said. . As the UK government spent £71,000 on the Supreme court producing a finding that the Union is not voluntary. To keep Scotland in the Union. Lets just say your idea of not caring is different from mine. You are also confirming that bankrupt England has the worst economy in the developed world, surpassed only by Russia and dragging Scotland with it. You are also confirming that Sunak was elected by nobody as PM. You are confirming that if Scotland had been on its merry own in 1976. England would still be a bankrupt economic third world basket case economy in the hands of the IMF. The sick man of Europe where it is heading now. Dragging energy rich Scotland with it. Well I am glad you confirmed what I said and sorts that out. And in the link below is the response from me to you. I am pleased to hear you confirmed it. ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/post/25367/thread I have to hand it to you . You never fail to amuse .😉 Yeh. Very amusing as you confirm what I said was correct. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 3, 2022 14:16:10 GMT
I have to hand it to you . You never fail to amuse .😉 Yeh. Very amusing as you confirm what I said was correct. I didn’t . |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Dec 3, 2022 14:22:44 GMT
Yeh. Very amusing as you confirm what I said was correct. I didn’t . Well then. What did I confirm. You asked me to read the post that you stated I confirmed. Have you a problem in answering simple questions. What the hell is it with silly Englishmen who have this hate filled bollocks about the Jocks and do not even know why. So let me ask you a nice simple question. What the hell are you on about that I confirmed. You just ranted drivel for the sake of ranting drivel. And do not have a clue why. Do you. You are another silly Englsihman who feels a need to make a total prat of yourself on subjects you have about as much idea about as a diesel driven donut. |
|
|
|
Post by morayloon on Dec 3, 2022 14:23:32 GMT
Scraping the barrel now: accusing me of dishonesty And lack of intelligence. And, questioning my understanding of the English language is a bit rich coming from you who wrote "would of" rather than the correct "would have" In addition I paraphrased what you wrote, the meaning did not change. You'll have to explain how you meant that last line to be read because as far as I'm concerned what you said was: A Scottish Nationalist's worst nightmare would be to gain independence only to find that the English don't care. Tell me what other meaning your words have. Anyway, why would we care what English people thought about our leaving the Union. I suspect that you realise that you have been caught misrepresenting my post and are now trying to save face by nit picking . Not nit picking. Rather my posts have all argued the same thing. I note that you make no attempt to correct my reading of that sentence. So, it seems it is your inability to write a clear and understandable sentence that is the problem here and not my "nit picking". Paraphrasing is not misrepresentation. Perhaps you could take me through what you actually thought you were posting. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 3, 2022 14:23:54 GMT
Well then. What did I confirm. You asked me to read the post that you stated I confirmed. Have you a problem in answering simple questions. What the hell is it with silly Englishmen who have this hate filled bollocks about the Jocks and do not even know why. So let me ask you a nice simple question. What the hell are you on about that I confirmed. You just ranted drivel for the sake of ranting drivel. And do not have a clue why. Do you. Come again? |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Dec 3, 2022 14:28:34 GMT
Well then. What did I confirm. You asked me to read the post that you stated I confirmed. Have you a problem in answering simple questions. What the hell is it with silly Englishmen who have this hate filled bollocks about the Jocks and do not even know why. So let me ask you a nice simple question. What the hell are you on about that I confirmed. You just ranted drivel for the sake of ranting drivel. And do not have a clue why. Do you. Come again? OK. Well then. What did I confirm. You asked me to read the post that you stated I confirmed. Have you a problem in answering simple questions. What the hell is it with silly Englishmen who have this hate filled bollocks about the Jocks and do not even know why. So let me ask you a nice simple question. What the hell are you on about that I confirmed. You just ranted drivel for the sake of ranting drivel. And do not have a clue why. Do you. You are just another silly Englishman who has this continual need to make a prat of himself on matters that he does not have one clue. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 3, 2022 14:28:50 GMT
I suspect that you realise that you have been caught misrepresenting my post and are now trying to save face by nit picking . Not nit picking. Rather my posts have all argued the same thing. I note that you make no attempt to correct my reading of that sentence. So, it seems it is your inability to write a clear and understandable sentence that is the problem here and not my "nit picking". Paraphrasing is not misrepresentation. Perhaps you could take me through what you actually thought you were posting. You cut and pasted the sentence I posted and you wrote and posted the misrepresentation. You didn't paraphrase . There is a difference between ‘ the Scot’s worst nightmare is the English being indifferent ‘ and ‘ the English will be indifferent’. I think your false claim that they mean the same thing confirms my point . Ill not repeat this again . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 3, 2022 14:29:29 GMT
OK. Well then. What did I confirm. You asked me to read the post that you stated I confirmed. Have you a problem in answering simple questions. What the hell is it with silly Englishmen who have this hate filled bollocks about the Jocks and do not even know why. So let me ask you a nice simple question. What the hell are you on about that I confirmed. You just ranted drivel for the sake of ranting drivel. And do not have a clue why. Do you. You are just another silly Englishman who has this continual need to make a prat of himself on matters that he does not have one clue. Read the posts and find out. |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Dec 3, 2022 14:30:15 GMT
Not nit picking. Rather my posts have all argued the same thing. I note that you make no attempt to correct my reading of that sentence. So, it seems it is your inability to write a clear and understandable sentence that is the problem here and not my "nit picking". Paraphrasing is not misrepresentation. Perhaps you could take me through what you actually thought you were posting. I think your false claim that they mean the same thing confirms my point . Ill not repeat this again . What are you confirming now. You make as much sense as a diesel driven donut |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Dec 3, 2022 14:31:09 GMT
OK. Well then. What did I confirm. You asked me to read the post that you stated I confirmed. Have you a problem in answering simple questions. What the hell is it with silly Englishmen who have this hate filled bollocks about the Jocks and do not even know why. So let me ask you a nice simple question. What the hell are you on about that I confirmed. You just ranted drivel for the sake of ranting drivel. And do not have a clue why. Do you. You are just another silly Englishman who has this continual need to make a prat of himself on matters that he does not have one clue. Read the posts and find out. I read the post. What did I confirm |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Dec 3, 2022 14:32:45 GMT
Read the posts and find out. I read the post. What did I confirm Read it carefully . |
|
