|
Post by Vinny on May 22, 2024 16:04:02 GMT
Of course I have answers. Embargo China. Move away from lithium ion batteries, utilise hydrogen more. Do as JCB do. I agree with the sentiment, but realistically I think any trade embargo would only hurt the UK. Rather than an abrupt halt, I think the government should slowly distance itself from China and cheap Chinese goods. A trade embargo by every developed country is needed.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 22, 2024 16:05:54 GMT
I agree with the sentiment, but realistically I think any trade embargo would only hurt the UK. Rather than an abrupt halt, I think the government should slowly distance itself from China and cheap Chinese goods. A trade embargo by every developed country is needed. You know that would never happen.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 22, 2024 16:17:13 GMT
Sadly, but nevertheless, it is what is needed against every dictatorship.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on May 22, 2024 18:10:07 GMT
China's government is an enemy regime. It's intelligence service is an enemy force. Those engaged in espionage against us, for China are those they'd kill to keep quiet, if caught by us. We had no motive to kill anyone who has info we'd be interested in. They have motive to prevent us finding out that info, i.e. the details of the rest of the Chinese spy network. Exactly I agree
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 22, 2024 18:29:20 GMT
Of course I have answers. Embargo China. Move away from lithium ion batteries, utilise hydrogen more. Do as JCB do. It's the wrong bet, but when JCB made that decision they decided electric was good for small diggers, but the ones that do motorways needed more power and they needed to run for a whole shift without being taken out of action to recharge since large digger hire is costly business. The way it is with electric is it is always the battery which is the problem. You can get a 500bhp electric motor that is so compact it can fit to each wheel of a car and then you have 2000bhp with ms computer accuracy regarding torque. It is as close to perfect as you would ever want. With batteries the main two issues are the cost and the energy density. As energy density increases it gives you larger parts of the overall market that can be achieved by electric. The highest bracket is commercial air travel which needs 1200wh/kg to be viable. So as energy density rises you start to see electric trucks and you can have electric boats as well. The story with hydrogen is you still have the Carnot limit to how much efficiency you get from your engine and how much energy you get is going to scale with the size of the engine as it does today. With batteries the energy density over time has increased far more than the extra power that can be got from a combustion engine because combustion engines are the result of 150 years of technical refinement, where batteries are a pretty new thing, at least the lithium ones are. Just the other day China published a paper in Nature for water batteries that can achieve 1200wh/kg. It's just at the lab stage right now, but I reckon something far more energy dense will be available in 5-10 years. If it were my money I would bet electric. You are welcome to do as you please with your own money. One thing going for China though is the amount of solar radiation per square meter year that falls on them is far more than with us. They are closer to the equator. Our advantage is north of the UK has some of the fastest wind speeds. Besides a UK government report said hydrogen was uneconomic in all cases except possibly for buses due to the economics of recharging time, meaning you need more buses. One thing you can do though is have detachable batteries so you drop the battery and jack up a recharged one into your bus or whatever.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 22, 2024 18:35:08 GMT
No excuses for dictatorships. No appeasement either. Fuck the Chinese Communist dictatorship.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 24, 2024 8:21:56 GMT
We've gone soft. Treason can kill. So can farmers with Shotguns
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 24, 2024 8:26:20 GMT
He was probably murdered to shut him up. Dunno about probably, but certainly possibly.
Either way, it suggests that he's guilty and he's either topped himself because he knew the game was up or, as you say, the Chinese did for him before he could talk.
Interesting.
Nice to see the Conspiracy theoriest are alive and well on this board lol
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 24, 2024 8:38:01 GMT
We've gone soft. Treason can kill. So can farmers with Shotguns Don't burgle farms then.... Simples.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 24, 2024 12:02:55 GMT
So can farmers with Shotguns Don't burgle farms then.... Simples. The Death penalty for burglary now is it .
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 24, 2024 12:03:55 GMT
Break into my home and attack me with a knife and I won't be held responsible for whatever I need to do in self defence.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 24, 2024 12:06:03 GMT
Break into my home and attack me with a knife and I won't be held responsible for whatever I need to do in self defence. There no evidence he was attacked none so ever .
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 24, 2024 12:12:08 GMT
And none that he wasn't. You weren't there.
If someone broke into your home, would you not consider that a threat?
I know of someone who at gunpoint ejected a burglar from his property, a burglar who was armed with a knife and had threatened to use it, before discovering to his horror, that the owner was substantially better armed than he was and had both barrels pointed straight at him.
Now, in that case, the owner did not fire, burglar was at the bottom of the stairs and he was at the top. Had the burglar advanced, he would have used lethal force. And so would you, if you'd been in his shoes.
Not to be evil, not to become a murderer, but to survive and ensure your family survived.
When someone breaks into a home and threatens the occupants, if they are hurt, it's their fault, not the owner's.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2024 12:14:13 GMT
Break into my home and attack me with a knife and I won't be held responsible for whatever I need to do in self defence. I think you're supposed to be disarmed and wait for them to kill your family. Keep in mind the Left ALWAYS support the criminal, as they support Hamas terrorists over the victims, and all other criminals in the UK. They're not fussy when recruiting.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 24, 2024 12:51:30 GMT
And none that he wasn't. You weren't there. If someone broke into your home, would you not consider that a threat? I know of someone who at gunpoint ejected a burglar from his property, a burglar who was armed with a knife and had threatened to use it, before discovering to his horror, that the owner was substantially better armed than he was and had both barrels pointed straight at him. Now, in that case, the owner did not fire, burglar was at the bottom of the stairs and he was at the top. Had the burglar advanced, he would have used lethal force. And so would you, if you'd been in his shoes. Not to be evil, not to become a murderer, but to survive and ensure your family survived. When someone breaks into a home and threatens the occupants, if they are hurt, it's their fault, not the owner's. neither was you there but you keep coming out with the same rubbish
|
|