|
Post by Bentley on Apr 22, 2024 14:44:17 GMT
Bullshit . You are a Jew hater hiding spouting β Zionismβ. You are so utterly stupid or dishonest that you claim that to say that Asia will become the dominant world region is racist . You are a mentally unstable anti Jew moron . Made up in your head all of it to cover for yourself. I know I shouldn't play with the lesser spotted Zionist trolls but on this occasion I thought somebody should point out how brainwashed you are, Yes sheepy those Jewish puppeteers feeding us from their Zionist tests again . Straight jacket alert for Sheepy the plonker! π
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Apr 22, 2024 15:01:36 GMT
Made up in your head all of it to cover for yourself. I know I shouldn't play with the lesser spotted Zionist trolls but on this occasion I thought somebody should point out how brainwashed you are, Yes sheepy those Jewish puppeteers feeding us from their Zionist tests again . Straight jacket alert for Sheepy the plonker! π You are going to have lock a lot of populist Jews up with me Einstein.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 22, 2024 15:03:38 GMT
Yes sheepy those Jewish puppeteers feeding us from their Zionist tests again . Straight jacket alert for Sheepy the plonker! π You are going to have lock a lot of populist Jews up with me Einstein. Maybe they will have a teat for you ..or a puppet .
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Apr 22, 2024 15:07:23 GMT
You are going to have lock a lot of populist Jews up with me Einstein. Maybe they will have a teat for you ..or a puppet . Now what Einstein you have been run ragged?
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 22, 2024 15:10:05 GMT
Maybe they will have a teat for you ..or a puppet . Now what Einstein you have been run ragged? I need a nice Zionist teat to feed on. Maybe you can make one up in your fevered little head for me .
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Apr 22, 2024 15:11:26 GMT
Now what Einstein you have been run ragged? I need a nice Zionist teat to feed on. Maybe you can make one up in your fevered little head for me . Take it from me you don't, it has sent you crazy already, strong cool aid that one.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 22, 2024 15:12:49 GMT
I need a nice Zionist teat to feed on. Maybe you can make one up in your fevered little head for me . Take it from me you don't, it has sent you crazy already, strong cool aid that one. Thatβs funny coming from a mentally unstable Jew hater.
|
|
|
Post by morayloon on Apr 22, 2024 15:22:49 GMT
1. It was not an anti Jewish rally... And again it clearly is if an "Openly Jewish" person isn't safe there simply by reason of being an openly Jewish person. Which was exactly the chaps point, which you and your fellow travellers are apparently too dim to grasp. It was a rally against the genocidal actions of the Israeli state, and its Zionist leadership. For which you, and your fellow travellers, seem quite happy to penalise British Jews who have absolutely nothing to do with it. Which, if you weren't so blinkered by your rabid anti-Semitism, you'd probably realise. But we are where we are. It was a pro-Palestinian rally which the person wanted to infiltrate. As doing so would possibly create a reaction from the marchers, surely, the policeman was correct in standing firm to a publicity seeking individual. Not only was the policeman attempting to prevent any escalation from peacefulness to hostility, he was preventing the man from putting himself in danger. Thepolice officer ought to receive a commendation for his patience in dealing with 5that person. Penalising? Do you mean that preventing a man from putting himself in harms way is somehow "penalising" that person? I would say that the policeman did what every right thinking person would have done in that situation.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Apr 22, 2024 15:29:26 GMT
Safe from who - the peaceful demonstration? When did I say it was peaceful please quote me if you can on that. Safe from the demonstrators peaceful or not and safe from his own stupidity on a contrived walk with others. Well if people going about their lawful business need to be kept safe from these protests then surely time to shut down the protests?. We have enough violence on the streets without allowing a mob to congregate every Saturday who could turn violent in a second.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 22, 2024 15:31:02 GMT
And again it clearly is if an "Openly Jewish" person isn't safe there simply by reason of being an openly Jewish person. Which was exactly the chaps point, which you and your fellow travellers are apparently too dim to grasp. For which you, and your fellow travellers, seem quite happy to penalise British Jews who have absolutely nothing to do with it. Which, if you weren't so blinkered by your rabid anti-Semitism, you'd probably realise. But we are where we are. It was a pro-Palestinian rally which the person wanted to infiltrate. As doing so would possibly create a reaction from the marchers, surely, the policeman was correct in standing firm to a publicity seeking individual. Not only was the policeman attempting to prevent any escalation from peacefulness to hostility, he was preventing the man from putting himself in danger. Thepolice officer ought to receive a commendation for his patience in dealing with 5that person. Penalising? Do you mean that preventing a man from putting himself in harms way is somehow "penalising" that person? I would say that the policeman did what every right thinking person would have done in that situation. The police told him that was antagonising the group and would be arrested if he stayed . They did NOT tell him that he was in the presence of Jew haters and for his own protection they needed to take him away from danger. .Do you see the difference?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2024 15:35:52 GMT
If the police do not have the resources to ensure the rights of people are not breached, further pro-Palestinian marches should be banned. They did it in other countries as they recognised the hatred that would spew onto the streets as people who are something else (Jew haters) masquerade as pro-Palestinians.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Apr 22, 2024 15:39:56 GMT
If the police do not have the resources to ensure the rights of people are not breached, further pro-Palestinian marches should be banned. They did it in other countries as they recognised the hatred that would spew onto the streets as people who are something else (Jew haters) masquerade as pro-Palestinians. So, you push people's rights of peaceful protests aside, because you don't like what they are saying, because there might be a few haters or might not. I don't think so, by peaceful protest the only people still getting murdered is in Gaza. I might go as far as say I don't think you are the type, but it might turn to other means which some would be gleeful about.
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Apr 22, 2024 15:55:20 GMT
When did I say it was peaceful please quote me if you can on that. Safe from the demonstrators peaceful or not and safe from his own stupidity on a contrived walk with others. Well if people going about their lawful business need to be kept safe from these protests then surely time to shut down the protests?. We have enough violence on the streets without allowing a mob to congregate every Saturday who could turn violent in a second. So you didnβt see me post that the protests are interminable or that if they are to continue they should be in a static designated area so London can return to some normality.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 22, 2024 16:05:05 GMT
I don't know what the police are telling the Jewish communities. However, if you have someone hell-bent on causing a disturbance, if not a riot, that person should be arrested. What leads you to believe he was intent on causing a riot? - all he wanted to do was walk home after visiting the Synagogue. It seems that any claim is valid to avoid acknowledging the threat from the pro-hamas protestors. Why do you persist in pushing this very obvious lie? There is no evidence at all the protesting against inhumane acts and war crimes in Gaza is necessarily or intrinsically linked with being pro-Hamas. It is entirely possible (and very probable) to oppose what Israel is doing in Gaza in relation to lack of aid, civilian casualties etc AND to oppose the abhorrent barbarism of Hamas terrorists. In fact I'd go further and say that it is also the ONLY moral stance to take All The Best
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Apr 22, 2024 16:13:02 GMT
It was a pro-Palestinian rally which the person wanted to infiltrate... Or an anti-Semitic hate march at which a Jew would clearly not be safe. Which was exactly the chaps point that you keep missing. ...As doing so would possibly create a reaction from the marchers... Only if they were anti-Semitic, which was again the chaps point. ...surely, the policeman was correct in standing firm to a publicity seeking individual. Not only was the policeman attempting to prevent any escalation from peacefulness to hostility, he was preventing the man from putting himself in danger... From an anti-Semitic mob, which both the chap and the police officer clearly recognised as such. And therein lies the problem. ...Thepolice officer ought to receive a commendation for his patience in dealing with 5that person... The individual officers actions were pragmatic, I'll give him that. But, if he was correct, then the overall police response of allowing a hate march to proceed was clearly wrong. ...Penalising? Do you mean that preventing a man from putting himself in harms way is somehow "penalising" that person? Yep. His rights were curtailed while criminality was allowed to proceed. It's epic victim blaming. ...I would say that the policeman did what every right thinking person would have done in that situation. No. The job of the police is to prevent and detect crime, not censure the victims.
As a right thinking civilian, I might well drag a victim away from a group of criminals but the job of the police is to deal with the criminals, not drag away the victim.
|
|