|
Post by Orac on Nov 24, 2022 12:11:58 GMT
Would that be possible without plastic and rubber I think so. A capacitor is just two large conductive sheets separated by an insulator (perhaps paper or even air), a resistor is just a coil, a relay is just a coil (electro magnet) with a switch. You could perhaps even have a stab at very basic semiconductor devices - but that's perhaps quite adventurous and wouldn't have much utility until you had invented the internet. A lot of this tech is just knowing what to do and miniaturisation
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Nov 24, 2022 13:36:46 GMT
Would that be possible without plastic and rubber I think so. A capacitor is just two large conductive sheets separated by an insulator (perhaps paper or even air), a resistor is just a coil, a relay is just a coil (electro magnet) with a switch. You could perhaps even have a stab at very basic semiconductor devices - but that's perhaps quite adventurous and wouldn't have much utility until you had invented the internet. A lot of this tech is just knowing what to do and miniaturisation Wow! That would be a development.
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Nov 24, 2022 17:40:00 GMT
I think so. A capacitor is just two large conductive sheets separated by an insulator (perhaps paper or even air), a resistor is just a coil, a relay is just a coil (electro magnet) with a switch. You could perhaps even have a stab at very basic semiconductor devices - but that's perhaps quite adventurous and wouldn't have much utility until you had invented the internet. A lot of this tech is just knowing what to do and miniaturisation Wow! That would be a development. As you were the OP I just wished it were like desert island discs and you could take so many items with you. Would've made it a damn sight easier to answer lol.
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Nov 24, 2022 17:43:50 GMT
Wow! That would be a development. As you were the OP I just wished it were like desert island discs and you could take so many items with you. Would've made it a damn sight easier to answer lol. That's not a bad idea for a thread, Wapentake. Maybe you could start one.
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Nov 24, 2022 17:47:41 GMT
As you were the OP I just wished it were like desert island discs and you could take so many items with you. Would've made it a damn sight easier to answer lol. That's not a bad idea for a thread, Wapentake. Maybe you could start one. Might do in time but this is a good make you think thread and still has legs yet.
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Nov 24, 2022 18:30:41 GMT
I agree. I started one on another forum ''greatest/most influential inventions of all time'' which went on a long and interesting run. If I did it again I'd draw a distinction between inventions and developments though as was hard to argue against fire and language as the most influential. I put up a strong case for glass.
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Nov 24, 2022 18:53:57 GMT
I couldn't produce penicillin, but maybe I could convince a scientist to look into it. I suppose that doesn't really count, as it would apply to many things. Besides, all I know is that it's produced from mold. Point of order. Science hadn't been invented by the early 16th century. You might find a philosopher or an alchemist to help you out though.
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 2, 2022 21:01:33 GMT
I've just heard an interesting little tidbit on QI. Fry explained that the Chinese preference for tea held the development of their culture back by hundreds of years. According to him, the West's liking for wine caused glass to be developed to hold it. This led to dozens of other things. Glass was ground to make lenses, extending the intellectual lives of the leading lights in science, etc., by up to 20 years, telescopes were made possible, thus leading to all sorts of discoveries in astronomy. Amazing how one little development can change history.
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Dec 3, 2022 1:04:02 GMT
I've just heard an interesting little tidbit on QI. Fry explained that the Chinese preference for tea held the development of their culture back by hundreds of years. According to him, the West's liking for wine caused glass to be developed to hold it. This led to dozens of other things. Glass was ground to make lenses, extending the intellectual lives of the leading lights in science, etc., by up to 20 years, telescopes were made possible, thus leading to all sorts of discoveries in astronomy. Amazing how one little development can change history. ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/post/22389/threadIndeed. Lenses brought about the age of science and the Renaissance. Once we had microscopes and telescopes and spectacles to extend the working life of scientists and academics we were finally able to overtake the Chinese in innovations. Tea also made the industrial revolution possible. The move from agriculture to manufacturing brought people to the cities in big numbers before we had clean drinking water. If it hadn't coincided with cheaper imports from the new Indian colony making it cheap enough for the masses the poor wouldn't be able to drink tea which involved boiling the water, there would have been outbreaks of waterborne diseases that would have made the industrial revolution virtually impossible. We could have drunk beer all day but that wouldn't have been as good for productivity and we might not have had enough malted barley and hops to cope with demand anyway. Our love of tea could be one of the main reasons the industrial revolution happened in Britain and made us rich enough to conquer 25% of the world.
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Dec 3, 2022 1:20:29 GMT
The Chinese did drink wine they drank it out of fine porcelain cups though. We really admired their porcelain but just didn't know how to make it and the Chinese wouldn't share the recipe with us so we refined the old Roman technology of glass instead. The Rhetoric of life and I had a big discussion about glass in my thread on the US site that I mentioned a couple of posts above. He never really got his head around it and he made a running joke about my ''obsession with glass'' when I first arrived on the old site.
I won't post a link to the thread on the US forum as ''most important inventions'' will make an interesting topic here and I don't want to give away all the things we came up with before. A lot of the things we think were invented in the west were invented in China long before though. From paper to gunpowder and the printing press, the Chinese got there first, It might even be a thread His Grace the Baron might enjoy.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Dec 3, 2022 2:24:31 GMT
Before the baron gets over-excited, I think you will find that the printing press was not invented in China.
I have never heard anyone claim that paper or gunpowder was anything but Chinese
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Dec 3, 2022 2:32:33 GMT
Before the baron gets over-excited, I think you will find that the printing press was not invented in China. I have never heard anyone claim that paper or gunpowder was anything but Chinese It was. Long before Gutenberg. Gutenberg's innovation was moveable type but the Chinese had carved block printers hundreds of years before that.
|
|
|
Post by totheleft3 on Dec 3, 2022 6:13:19 GMT
Don't know about inventing or showing them anything but would like to be john calvin friend
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Dec 3, 2022 8:32:26 GMT
Don't know about inventing or showing them anything but would like to be john calvin friend I had to look him up if I'm honest ttl. It's not an area of particular interest to me. I'm guessing he was a major influence in the move away from rigid Catholic doctrine though. That move away is a part of the Renaissance and reinforced the move towards more critical thinking and eventually the scientific method and the modern world so I understand why you would befriend him. I find it ironic that the starting point for the scientific era was an act of God. I forget the exact date but the Lisbon earthquake on All Saints Day which occurred when most of the population was in church celebrating the important religious celebration when the quake hit the Portuguese city. It was a triple whammy too. First the earthquake, then a massive fire started by all the candles burning to honour the day and finally the tsunami created by the quake. That's enough to shake anyone's faith in God. How could a loving God make or allow such a thing to happen? Of course now we know it wasn't an act of God but a consequence of plate tectonics and the beginnings of the end of the totalitarian power of the Catholic church who had previously persecuted philosophers for suggesting things like the earth moved around the Sun rather than the other way around. That's not to say I think faith has no value or that it hasn't played a big part in who we are and what our culture and traditions have become over the centuries and also provided solace for vulnerable and successful people alike. It was a major barrier to learning before that fateful day though. I even have my own faith systems of beliefs and dogma. I'm a follower of mother Earth and a Pastafarian. All praise to Gaia and the Flying Spaghetti Monster, all praise his noodly appendages. Edit 1755, I thought it was a bit earlier than that.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Dec 3, 2022 10:44:46 GMT
Guttenberg's innovation was moveable type but the Chinese had carved block printers hundreds of years before that. That's not my understanding - moveable type started in China or Korea and was also used in Europe before the printing press (ie it it is a separate innovation). Printing by various methods took place well before the printing press
|
|