|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 10:02:19 GMT
Just in time for the labour infestation to be at the helm......What could possibly go wrong?
The EUSSR Parliament has approved a controversial shake-up of the bloc's migration system which advocates claim will better "protect" its borders.
After eight years of wrangling between the 27 member states, the compromise proposals aim to cut the time for asylum procedures and reduce immigration from the Middle East and Africa. The new system would mean the wider bloc would be obligated to take in migrants who arrive in mainly "frontline" countries like Greece and Italy - or be required to provide extra funds or resources instead.
|
|
|
Post by piglet on Apr 11, 2024 10:15:42 GMT
If people think the Tories are bad, things are about to get worse, much worse. Looking into mt crystal ball, i seee a parliament, with Labour in charge in a fulminating crescendo of crisis, when the general population realises that Labour are no improvement.
The NHS will be exposed as a death organisation, there will be no money to fund owt, pensions, social care, benefits etc. While train drivers are on 60k for a four day weeek, doing over time at an enhaced rate.
Thankyou very much madam. We pay ourselves way to much. To cut it short, the Tories have lost control of everything, they are in power but have none.
Labour will be like a house of playing cards in a high wind.
As a child, i had a lot of playing cards and built five storey houses. Its a skill.
Its going to be entertainment of the highest order, if sky could televise it they would charge a fortune. Imagine Labour reigning in public pay? HAAAAAAAA. Starmer has the face of a man lost, confused, slow, stumbling, imagine him in power. Contrary to opinion, good days coming, when Labour foul up again, they are done for good......all of this is building up into the birth of new politics, the old doesnt work anymore.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 11, 2024 10:19:57 GMT
Just in time for the labour infestation to be at the helm......What could possibly go wrong?
The EUSSR Parliament has approved a controversial shake-up of the bloc's migration system which advocates claim will better "protect" its borders.
After eight years of wrangling between the 27 member states, the compromise proposals aim to cut the time for asylum procedures and reduce immigration from the Middle East and Africa. The new system would mean the wider bloc would be obligated to take in migrants who arrive in mainly "frontline" countries like Greece and Italy - or be required to provide extra funds or resources instead.
As we are no longer a part of the EU the EU distribution of Immigrants and Asylum Seekers should not affect us.If it does it means our Government were incompetent in negotiating that Brexit Agreement. Rather predictably for a link provided by Jonksy it actually proves him wrong (it is perhaps his most proficient debating skill). The new provisions apply ONLY to EU Member States, of which we are not one. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Apr 11, 2024 10:27:47 GMT
The new EU regulations WILL NOT affect us because we are not a part of the EU
However, I congratulate the EU in reaching a consensus, and it is right that those nations which bare the brunt of the migrant crisis, the ones at the frontline, should be helped by others with not simply resources, but by a fair agreement to share the arrivals in order to evaluate and process.
Its called "common sense"
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Apr 11, 2024 10:58:15 GMT
Of course it makes rejoining the EU less likely - if as well as scrapping the Pound for the Euro we have to take in a share of the EU's asylum seekers as well as our own then they are going to struggle to get a majority to vote for that.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 11, 2024 11:06:14 GMT
The new EU regulations WILL NOT affect us because we are not a part of the EU However, I congratulate the EU in reaching a consensus, and it is right that those nations which bare the brunt of the migrant crisis, the ones at the frontline, should be helped by others with not simply resources, but by a fair agreement to share the arrivals in order to evaluate and process. Its called "common sense" LOLS. You neglect to mention that the 'migrant crisis' you speak of, is 100% designed and implemented by the EU. Yes it's out of control now and the EU are panicking and attempting to correct their incompetence, but make no mistake the architects of the great European migration disaster sit behind closed doors in Brussels.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 11, 2024 11:22:03 GMT
Channel 4 news last night, UK reporters at the French borders, where they recorded border police almost escorting the illegals in their dinghies, the dinghy had set sail while a pile of them were still left behind, so the dinghy does no more than turn back round to pick them, all this while border force police watch on.
When the footage was shown to the French border police they excuse was they'd already stopped 600 THAT DAY, and they were turning violent. FFS
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 11:31:11 GMT
Just in time for the labour infestation to be at the helm......What could possibly go wrong?
The EUSSR Parliament has approved a controversial shake-up of the bloc's migration system which advocates claim will better "protect" its borders.
After eight years of wrangling between the 27 member states, the compromise proposals aim to cut the time for asylum procedures and reduce immigration from the Middle East and Africa. The new system would mean the wider bloc would be obligated to take in migrants who arrive in mainly "frontline" countries like Greece and Italy - or be required to provide extra funds or resources instead.
As we are no longer a part of the EU the EU distribution of Immigrants and Asylum Seekers should not affect us.If it does it means our Government were incompetent in negotiating that Brexit Agreement.Rather predictably for a link provided by Jonksy it actually proves him wrong (it is perhaps his most proficient debating skill). The new provisions apply ONLY to EU Member States, of which we are not one. All The Best Well the usual left made sure o that one did they not?
We are supposedly not a member of the EUSSR NOW has that stopped the influx? Like fuck it has..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2024 13:03:46 GMT
The new EU regulations WILL NOT affect us because we are not a part of the EU However, I congratulate the EU in reaching a consensus, and it is right that those nations which bare the brunt of the migrant crisis, the ones at the frontline, should be helped by others with not simply resources, but by a fair agreement to share the arrivals in order to evaluate and process. Its called "common sense" LOLS. You neglect to mention that the 'migrant crisis' you speak of, is 100% designed and implemented by the EU. Yes it's out of control now and the EU are panicking and attempting to correct their incompetence, but make no mistake the architects of the great European migration disaster sit behind closed doors in Brussels. All our illegal immigrants are coming from the EU. They had to cross most of it to get to the French coast before boarding the 8am dinghy. witchfinder doesn't seem to appreciate the knock on effect of porous borders.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Apr 11, 2024 13:32:38 GMT
All our illegal immigrants are coming from the EU. Not true.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2024 13:39:21 GMT
All our illegal immigrants are coming from the EU. Not true. OK. I mean via the EU. Agreed?
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Apr 11, 2024 13:51:19 GMT
No. Many arrive directly from their home country, or via a transit country (not necessarily in the EU).
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 11, 2024 13:57:59 GMT
No. Many arrive directly from their home country, or via a transit country (not necessarily in the EU). Let's just keep it simple then, we'll just stick to the tens of thousands passing through EU borders to get to France to get to the UK, and yes they do come via other modes of transport to the UK, but not anything on the scale like the Channel crossings.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Apr 11, 2024 14:34:56 GMT
Of the 120,000 or so small boat arrivals since 2018 only those arriving since July 2023 are covered by the new legislation which (theoretically) categorises them as illegal migrants, inadmissible to make an asylum claim. I say theoretically since unless and until a safe country can be found to take them they are treated exactly the same as 'legal' arrivals in terms of asylum support and accommodation. In effect they form another backlog.
Whether or not that backlog will ever be cleared by deportation or removal to Rwanda, say, remains to be seen but the very strong probability is that another 'backlog clearance exercise' (i.e. amnesty) will be necessary, like the one Rishi conducted before Christmas to remove the 100,000 or so 'legacy' cases from the system.
In the meantime illegals continue to arrive via other channels and thousands of others who arrived legally on visitor or study visas become ilegal by overstaying, or by disappearing when their asylum claim is refused.
At any one point in time the number of channel arrivals who are actually classified as illegal is only a small fraction of the total illegal population.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Apr 11, 2024 14:36:04 GMT
duplicate deleted
|
|