|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 26, 2024 17:19:01 GMT
It's just been reported on GB News that the judge who granted chemical attacker Abdul Ezidi asylum did so even though he knew Ezedi was a liar. The Clapham chemical attacker was granted asylum despite the Home Office warning that he had failed a Christianity test and was “using religion for his own ends”. Newly released documents show an immigration judge accepted Abdul Ezedi’s conversion as genuine even though he could not answer basic Home Office questions about Christianity and was found to have repeatedly lied about his background. Ezedi, an Afghan who came to the UK illegally in 2016, died in the River Thames while on the run after attacking a 31-year-old mother and her two daughters with a corrosive substance near Clapham Common on Jan 31. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/26/clapham-attacker-abdul-ezedi-christianity-asylum/Another left wing Judge who should be investigated for bias/incompetence? Looks like it...
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Mar 26, 2024 18:14:36 GMT
It's just been reported on GB News that the judge who granted chemical attacker Abdul Ezidi asylum did so even though he knew Ezedi was a liar. The Clapham chemical attacker was granted asylum despite the Home Office warning that he had failed a Christianity test and was “using religion for his own ends”. Newly released documents show an immigration judge accepted Abdul Ezedi’s conversion as genuine even though he could not answer basic Home Office questions about Christianity and was found to have repeatedly lied about his background. Ezedi, an Afghan who came to the UK illegally in 2016, died in the River Thames while on the run after attacking a 31-year-old mother and her two daughters with a corrosive substance near Clapham Common on Jan 31. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/26/clapham-attacker-abdul-ezedi-christianity-asylum/Another left wing Judge who should be investigated for bias/incompetence? Looks like it... What left wing judge ? Do you mean this one Judge O’Hanlon granted asylum after concluding Ezedi’s conversion was “genuine”.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 26, 2024 18:24:10 GMT
It's just been reported on GB News that the judge who granted chemical attacker Abdul Ezidi asylum did so even though he knew Ezedi was a liar. The Clapham chemical attacker was granted asylum despite the Home Office warning that he had failed a Christianity test and was “using religion for his own ends”. Newly released documents show an immigration judge accepted Abdul Ezedi’s conversion as genuine even though he could not answer basic Home Office questions about Christianity and was found to have repeatedly lied about his background. Ezedi, an Afghan who came to the UK illegally in 2016, died in the River Thames while on the run after attacking a 31-year-old mother and her two daughters with a corrosive substance near Clapham Common on Jan 31. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/26/clapham-attacker-abdul-ezedi-christianity-asylum/Another left wing Judge who should be investigated for bias/incompetence? Looks like it... What left wing judge ? Do you mean this one Judge O’Hanlon granted asylum after concluding Ezedi’s conversion was “genuine”. Charlie, the judge surprisingly had prior knowledge from the Home Office that Ezidi was a convicted sex offender, had repeatedly lied, was using religious conversion to his own ends, and was a risk. The judge probably thought this advice from the Home Office would never be made public, unlucky. Quite clearly this judge is incompetent and the Lord Chancellor should dismiss him pdq.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 26, 2024 18:29:43 GMT
I notice they haven't officially confirmed it was his body fished out of the Thames.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Mar 26, 2024 18:30:27 GMT
What left wing judge ? Do you mean this one Judge O’Hanlon granted asylum after concluding Ezedi’s conversion was “genuine”. Charlie, the judge surprisingly had prior knowledge from the Home Office that Ezidi was a convicted sex offender, had repeatedly lied, was using religious conversion to his own ends, and was a risk. The judge probably thought this advice from the Home Office would never be made public, unlucky. Quite clearly this judge is incompetent and the Lord Chancellor should dismiss him pdq. Have you red the Telegraph article red ? He refused him Asylum 3 times Before. Until a Reverend Said he Attened church for 4yrs following his Conversion . Or you just relying on GB news story .
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 26, 2024 18:33:57 GMT
Charlie, the judge surprisingly had prior knowledge from the Home Office that Ezidi was a convicted sex offender, had repeatedly lied, was using religious conversion to his own ends, and was a risk. The judge probably thought this advice from the Home Office would never be made public, unlucky. Quite clearly this judge is incompetent and the Lord Chancellor should dismiss him pdq. Have you red the Telegraph article red ? He refused him Asylum 3 times Before. Until a Reverend Said he Attened church for 4yrs following his Conversion . Or you just relying on GB news story . I'm relying on the facts. Ezidi was a convicted sex offender, he repeatedly lied, he was using religious conversion to his own ends, and the Home Office considered him to be a risk. How many red flags does it take before an illegal immigrant and criminal is deported?
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 26, 2024 18:35:03 GMT
What left wing judge ? Do you mean this one Judge O’Hanlon granted asylum after concluding Ezedi’s conversion was “genuine”. Charlie, the judge surprisingly had prior knowledge from the Home Office that Ezidi was a convicted sex offender, had repeatedly lied, was using religious conversion to his own ends, and was a risk. The judge probably thought this advice from the Home Office would never be made public, unlucky. Quite clearly this judge is incompetent and the Lord Chancellor should dismiss him pdq. His first two requests for Asylum were refused, his third after he allegedly converted to Christianity was successful !!!!, allegedly he had to be escorted in the Church and out of it in order to protect other members of the congregations who knew he was a sex offender and flasher.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 26, 2024 18:35:40 GMT
It's just been reported on GB News that the judge who granted chemical attacker Abdul Ezidi asylum did so even though he knew Ezedi was a liar. The Clapham chemical attacker was granted asylum despite the Home Office warning that he had failed a Christianity test and was “using religion for his own ends”. Newly released documents show an immigration judge accepted Abdul Ezedi’s conversion as genuine even though he could not answer basic Home Office questions about Christianity and was found to have repeatedly lied about his background. Ezedi, an Afghan who came to the UK illegally in 2016, died in the River Thames while on the run after attacking a 31-year-old mother and her two daughters with a corrosive substance near Clapham Common on Jan 31. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/26/clapham-attacker-abdul-ezedi-christianity-asylum/Another left wing Judge who should be investigated for bias/incompetence? Looks like it... He might have been a left wing judge but you need to post proof if you are to make such a strong assertion.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Mar 26, 2024 18:37:49 GMT
Have you red the Telegraph article red ? He refused him Asylum 3 times Before. Until a Reverend Said he Attened church for 4yrs following his Conversion . Or you just relying on GB news story . I'm relying on the facts. Ezidi was a convicted sex offender, he repeatedly lied, he was using religious conversion to his own ends, and the Home Office considered him to be a risk. How many red flags does it take before an illegal immigrant and criminal is deported? Well I agree there but don't think there anything about him being a convicted sex offender in the Telegraph article I have a look again .
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 26, 2024 18:38:10 GMT
Actually, if the sex offending criminal had been deported he would still be alive wouldn't he. Hey ho, swings & roundabouts.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 26, 2024 18:40:39 GMT
It's just been reported on GB News that the judge who granted chemical attacker Abdul Ezidi asylum did so even though he knew Ezedi was a liar. The Clapham chemical attacker was granted asylum despite the Home Office warning that he had failed a Christianity test and was “using religion for his own ends”. Newly released documents show an immigration judge accepted Abdul Ezedi’s conversion as genuine even though he could not answer basic Home Office questions about Christianity and was found to have repeatedly lied about his background. Ezedi, an Afghan who came to the UK illegally in 2016, died in the River Thames while on the run after attacking a 31-year-old mother and her two daughters with a corrosive substance near Clapham Common on Jan 31. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/26/clapham-attacker-abdul-ezedi-christianity-asylum/Another left wing Judge who should be investigated for bias/incompetence? Looks like it... He might have been a left wing judge but you need to post proof if you are to make such a strong assertion. No you're quite wrong. You can demand anything you like however, I certainly do not have to provide anything.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Mar 26, 2024 18:43:33 GMT
Actually, if the sex offending criminal had been deported he would still be alive wouldn't he. Hey ho, swings & roundabouts. Just Checked yep he should of been chucked out of the country
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 26, 2024 18:47:31 GMT
Actually, if the sex offending criminal had been deported he would still be alive wouldn't he. Hey ho, swings & roundabouts. And a woman would have not have been disfigured for life, nor would her two children have been physically injured and mentally traumatised as he tried to run them over, he meant to kill all three of them IMO
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 26, 2024 18:49:18 GMT
Actually, if the sex offending criminal had been deported he would still be alive wouldn't he. Hey ho, swings & roundabouts. Just Checked yep he should of been chucked out of the country Well said Charlie. I knew you were a sensible chap.
|
|