Rwanda Bill: MP's give Lords bloody nose...

He says he will reverse it, and on this issue, I believe him. 

They havn't cleared the hurdles yet, opposition Lords are going to put back some of the ammendments when it goes back to The Lords, and if succesfull will at the very least delay the Bill becoming law.

Next, will come more legal challenges, and beyond that there's some strong hints from trade unions that they will refuse to co-operate with the deportations, knowing that the Supreme Court have categorically stated that deportations could lead to human rights abuses.

But I suppose that at £2 MILLION per person deported, its a really good way of spending tax payers money.

No doubt about it, the Lords will obviously attempt to delay prevaricate and slow things down as much as possible, which suggests they are more of a protest chamber than a revising chamber, but hey they know they're safe with Labour. 

The Supreme Court, another Blair monstrosity. It should be scrapped along with his Human Rights Act. Blair not only changed this country forever but he put in place legislation that ensured future governments couldn't easilly change it. And he still didn't get to be unelected EU president, lol he must have been gutted.

You left wing spineless anti English morons are fond of carping on about the rights of illegals and foreign criminals, but what about the rights of English people who were never asked if they wanted their country cities towns and neighbourhoods changed forever, and if they were stupid enough to comment they were shouted down as nasty bigoted far right extremists. 

You lot laughed at UKIP, and as Farage famously said, you're not laughing now. Today you're laughing at Reform UK, you lefties don't learn do you. 

And it's working, look at Londonistan.

Well said H, you know it makes sense. 

The UK was one of the only nations in the democratic world without a PROPER supreme court, we had an utterly preposterous situation where The House Of Lords was the senior court of appeal.

The creation of The United Kingdom Supreme Court made the court of final appeal more independent, and weakened political ties, which has got to be a good thing.

Every European nation excluding Belaruss and Russia ( which says a lot ) are party to the ECHR, including nations on the fringes of Europe, Turkey and Azerbaijan, and there is virtually no possibility of withdrawal from the ECHR as a majority of MPs from the four main political partys ( Con, Lab, LibDem, SNP ) are in favour of retention.

Creating level playing fields as regards to The Law, International Law, including international treaties and conventions which safeguard life and liberty is what its all about.

Nations who are party to the ECHR would not for example be allowed to have a "Guantanamo Bay", where "SUSPECTS" can be held indefinately without trial. Yet when foreign agents or foreign governments hold Americans without trial, the Americans call them "hostages".

You people of "The Populist Right" would protest if a British soldier was taken to court for murdering or executing an Iraqi civillian, but would also protest if an Iraqi murdered a British citizen. You cannot have justice which works only one way, but not the opposite way, it HAS TO be equal justice for all.

As that old saying goes  "The Law is THE LAW"