|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 20, 2024 20:42:04 GMT
GN news seems to have triggered a few lefties a few times . Must be doing something right . Well, typically it is when someone triggers people from both sides of a debate that they are assumed to be doing something right. Only triggering people from one side of a debate tends to show an overt bias to the other side of the debate. Personally, I prefer News Sources to look dispassionately at all sides of the equation. All The Best If a new source looks dispassionately at all sides of the debate then by definition it wouldn’t be triggering both sides or in fact anyone. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 20, 2024 20:43:49 GMT
GN news seems to have triggered a few lefties a few times . Must be doing something right .
The same way that the BBC is allegedly not left wing yet every time it's criticised the lefties turn out en masse to defend it. It’s their cult like mindset . Lefties think that they are the moral arbiters. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2024 20:45:52 GMT
GN news seems to have triggered a few lefties a few times . Must be doing something right . And yet it was you right wing tossers that could not resist starting yet another thread about it. So I guess the regulators must be doing something right. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2024 20:48:49 GMT
The same way that the BBC is allegedly not left wing yet every time it's criticised the lefties turn out en masse to defend it. It’s their cult like mindset . Lefties think that they are the moral arbiters. What hilarious irony, lol |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 20, 2024 20:49:15 GMT
GN news seems to have triggered a few lefties a few times . Must be doing something right . And yet it was you right wing tossers that could not resist starting yet another thread about it. So I guess the regulators must be doing something right. Yup . And the lefties responded to it like a swarm of flies to shit 😁 |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 20, 2024 20:52:37 GMT
Said a man still droning on six hours after I last posted!  Seriously Shrieks, haven't you got Jews to be hating on or something, you anti-Semitic pillock. 🙄 You are just a twat trying to be provocative with lies, false labels and insults. Go shove your head up your arse which is where you usually keep it. You have never been able to provide the slightest evidence of my supposed antisemitism. But the evidence of you being a twat is everywhere, including in the very post I have just quoted. And of course you are yourself one of the obvious racists around here. Ok then Shrieks: You spent 15 pages defending an established anti-Semite, suspended from her own party for it, while claiming that I and everyone else that pointed out the flaw in your reasoning are "Racist" because you think so (despite your total inability to provide any evidence when challenged). So, on the balance of probability, the evidence for you being an anti-Semite is vastly greater than your evidence for myself and your other detractors being racist. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2024 20:55:13 GMT
Well, typically it is when someone triggers people from both sides of a debate that they are assumed to be doing something right. Only triggering people from one side of a debate tends to show an overt bias to the other side of the debate. Personally, I prefer News Sources to look dispassionately at all sides of the equation. All The Best If a new source looks dispassionately at all sides of the debate then by definition it wouldn’t be triggering both sides or in fact anyone. Or it could be triggering everyone. Both the right and the left seem to believe the BBC is biased against it. This in the opinion of some of it's defenders means it must be doing something right. I just think that on socio-economic issues it has a profound right wing bias, but on social libertarian and equality issues it's bias is much more left wing. But at heart it is a fierce defender of the Establishment, albeit from the devout socially liberal perspective which it's generally university educated movers and shakers have grown up with. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 20, 2024 21:00:12 GMT
If a new source looks dispassionately at all sides of the debate then by definition it wouldn’t be triggering both sides or in fact anyone. Or it could be triggering everyone. Both the right and the left seem to believe the BBC is biased against it. This in the opinion of some of it's defenders means it must be doing something right. I just think that on socio-economic issues it has a profound right wing bias, but on social libertarian and equality issues it's bias is much more left wing. But at heart it is a fierce defender of the Establishment, albeit from the devout socially liberal perspective which it's generally university educated movers and shakers have grown up with. Nope. If it looks dispassionately at all sides it wouldn’t trigger anyone . The BBC could trigger everyone by being bias towards left and right at different times but that’s not being dispassionate. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2024 21:02:25 GMT
You are just a twat trying to be provocative with lies, false labels and insults. Go shove your head up your arse which is where you usually keep it. You have never been able to provide the slightest evidence of my supposed antisemitism. But the evidence of you being a twat is everywhere, including in the very post I have just quoted. And of course you are yourself one of the obvious racists around here. Ok then Shrieks: You spent 15 pages defending an established anti-Semite, suspended from her own party for it, while claiming that I and everyone else that pointed out the flaw in your reasoning are "Racist" because you think so (despite your total inability to provide any evidence when challenged). So, on the balance of probability, the evidence for you being an anti-Semite is vastly greater than your evidence for myself and your other detractors being racist. Bollocks. I was primarily attacking Hester. Your need to attempt to explain away his obviously racist comments is itself strong evidence of your own racism. But we are going round in circles. If you come back at me with more shite you have already said umpteen times already I will most likely just respond next time, if at all, with a single word. Unless you surprise me by saying something original that has clearly been based upon thought. But that does not happen too often with you. You seem to feel far more comfortable talking shit and trying to get a rise out of people you cant better in a debate |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 20, 2024 21:03:53 GMT
The same way that the BBC is allegedly not left wing yet every time it's criticised the lefties turn out en masse to defend it. What is a "lefty"? People like you seem to think it is an insult for anyone who thinks differently to you; but even that doesn't really define it. All The Best Nah, disagreeing with me doesn't make someone a lefty.
But people screaming "Racist" at anyone that disagrees with them certainly does.
Although that's not the only defining factor.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 20, 2024 21:10:50 GMT
Bollocks. I was not primarily attacking Hester... I agree, which is why I never said you were. ...Your need to attempt to explain away his obviously racist comments... What racist comments? ...But we are going round in circles... Again, we agree: You misunderstood the first time and you keep doing it. ...If you come back at me with more shite. I've simply stated fact, Shrieks. Which is why you can only shout: "Racist" whilst defending an anti-Semite. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 20, 2024 21:54:12 GMT
What is a "lefty"? People like you seem to think it is an insult for anyone who thinks differently to you; but even that doesn't really define it. All The Best Nah, disagreeing with me doesn't make someone a lefty.
But people screaming "Racist" at anyone that disagrees with them certainly does.
Although that's not the only defining factor.
Even if that person has expressed views that could reasonably be seen as racist? Note: Not saying anyone has, just trying to see what "lefty" means, because usually it is an utterly meaningless ad hom. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Mar 20, 2024 22:08:42 GMT
GB news will be like Trump, the deep state are out to get Trump, now GB news are on the list. If you deviate from proscibed dogma, your history. The dogma being the deep-state is out to get Trump? The ONLY person responsible for Trump being mired in court cases is Trump. He breaks the law. He commits Rape / Sexual Assault. He lies in official documents about the financial health of his companies. No one bats an eye-lid. The moment someone decides to hold the serial criminal to account people start screaming "deep-state witch-hunt"? What a crock of shit. He deserves those court cases. He deserves to be held accountable. He deserves to loose assets if he refuses to stump up $400 Million despite him alleging he is worth multi $billions. Likewise BG News deserve to be held accountable when the break the rules that govern their industry. It really is not rocket science, is it? All The Best I agree Trump is at best a disaster for the US at worst the rest of the world but then when you see the alternative Alzheimer Joe is as bad,how the US got to this point only they know. As far as GB news it’s the media they use the politicians and vice versa,if though action is taken against them will the same be done regards the Beeb journalists liking online comments about Hamas (that’s from someone appalled about Nutanyahus actions in Gaza) I always remember spittingimage portraying journalists as pigs and some are any ideas what some politicians be portrayed as? Answers on a postcard  |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 20, 2024 22:26:29 GMT
Yep, it's almost a full house of lying leftwing idiots trying to back up each other's troll. Still, it does amuse me when they're desperately trying to convince the forum that they're highly intelligent. It reeks of insecurity.
We on the left are merely pointing out the obvious bias of GB News, along with the fact that it has been found by a regulatory authority to have broken the rules on multiple occasions re broadcasting impartiality. Which none of their more mainstream and popular rivals have.
Really? - yes OFCOM seem to be picking on GB News for some unknown reason ( ) but bias is not very hard to find in the major players. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 21, 2024 5:38:17 GMT
...just trying to see what "lefty" means, because usually it is an utterly meaningless ad hom... And so is "Racist" in many cases. And screaming "Racist" without any evidence is the hallmark of the rabid left. |
|
