|
|
Post by seniorcitizen007 on Mar 29, 2024 19:29:12 GMT
World-wide the amount of money migrant workers send back to their home countries is approaching a trillion dollars a year ... and this is only what the authorities are able to record.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 30, 2024 21:09:37 GMT
It's the end of March, we are three months into the year and so far the incompetent bunch of toerags in government have allowed no fewar that 5000 illegals to cross the channel this year. 5000 in three months, and lets not forget, that's the official figure. God only knows what the actual figure might be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 31, 2024 17:19:14 GMT
349 more landed on the South Coast yesterday the 30th March, it is never ending
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 1, 2024 14:28:47 GMT
Just been reported that at the moment the nationalities of three biggest groups of refugees crossing the channel from war torn France are:
Vietnamese
Chinese
Turkish.
So at best they are economic migrants, not as outraged lefties claim, refugees or asylum seekers. In fact, in reality they are criminals. But hey, lets not get reality confused with 1950's legislation.
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Apr 1, 2024 14:42:48 GMT
Just been reported that at the moment the nationalities of three biggest groups of refugees crossing the channel from war torn France are: Vietnamese Chinese Turkish. So at best they are economic migrants, not as outraged lefties claim, refugees or asylum seekers. In fact, in reality they are criminals. But hey, lets not get reality confused with 1950's legislation. But you got your way and took the UK's borders back. So it's about time you learned to control them — especially as the UK has immigration checkpoints in Calais and Dunkirk where UK Border Force officers have the power to arrest and detain individuals in the immigration control zones...
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 1, 2024 14:56:05 GMT
Just been reported that at the moment the nationalities of three biggest groups of refugees crossing the channel from war torn France are: Vietnamese Chinese Turkish. So at best they are economic migrants, not as outraged lefties claim, refugees or asylum seekers. In fact, in reality they are criminals. But hey, lets not get reality confused with 1950's legislation. But you got your way and took the UK's borders back. So it's about time you learned to control them — especially as the UK has immigration checkpoints in Calais and Dunkirk where UK Border Force officers have the power to arrest and detain individuals in the immigration control zones... Don't talk bloody rubbish. We are paying the French £millions in an attempt to encourage them, bribe them, cajole them, to get off their arses and control their own borders. The EU have built 20ft high anti immigrant fences patrolled by armed guards and dogs on their eastern border. However, the UK must be punished for Brexit. |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Apr 1, 2024 15:43:19 GMT
But you got your way and took the UK's borders back. So it's about time you learned to control them — especially as the UK has immigration checkpoints in Calais and Dunkirk where UK Border Force officers have the power to arrest and detain individuals in the immigration control zones... Don't talk bloody rubbish. We are paying the French £millions in an attempt to encourage them, bribe them, cajole them, to get off their arses and control their own borders. The EU have built 20ft high anti immigrant fences patrolled by armed guards and dogs on their eastern border. However, the UK must be punished for Brexit. Brexit is over and almost done. Pity it’s not panning out the way it was promised. Paying out millions to the French, the Rwandans, or anybody is obviously not the answer. It’s the UK’s shores that need protecting and the UK has been solely responsible for those for some time now — but somehow the UK doesn’t realise the current mass movements of people across the world cannot be dealt with by one nation alone… |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 1, 2024 16:02:04 GMT
Don't talk bloody rubbish. We are paying the French £millions in an attempt to encourage them, bribe them, cajole them, to get off their arses and control their own borders. The EU have built 20ft high anti immigrant fences patrolled by armed guards and dogs on their eastern border. However, the UK must be punished for Brexit. Brexit is over and almost done. Pity it’s not panning out the way it was promised. Paying out millions to the French, the Rwandans, or anybody is obviously not the answer. It’s the UK’s shores that need protecting and the UK has been solely responsible for those for some time now — but somehow the UK doesn’t realise the current mass movements of people across the world cannot be dealt with by one nation alone… Brexit could have worked, it should have worked, but unfortunately it doesn't matter what the majority want or voted for. The left wing pro EU establishment including the civil service and 70% of MP's did not want Brexit and were determined to stop it or make it as difficult and tortuous a process as possible. The majority in this country have been fucked over, but you know this. I agree Rwanda was never going to work, it's a gimmick. And the reason the government have been forced to rely on gimmicks is because Sunak, and his predecessors, were pro EU they did not/do not want to upset the EU. The government could stop the boats entering UK territorial waters, it would be unpopular with lefties and the EU would go mental, but international law would be on the governments side. The problem is, to implement international law in the best interests of the UK we first need a government who is willing to put the UK first. |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Apr 1, 2024 19:49:31 GMT
Brexit is over and almost done. Pity it’s not panning out the way it was promised. Paying out millions to the French, the Rwandans, or anybody is obviously not the answer. It’s the UK’s shores that need protecting and the UK has been solely responsible for those for some time now — but somehow the UK doesn’t realise the current mass movements of people across the world cannot be dealt with by one nation alone… Brexit could have worked, it should have worked, but unfortunately it doesn't matter what the majority want or voted for. The left wing pro EU establishment including the civil service and 70% of MP's did not want Brexit and were determined to stop it or make it as difficult and tortuous a process as possible. The majority in this country have been fucked over, but you know this. I agree Rwanda was never going to work, it's a gimmick. And the reason the government have been forced to rely on gimmicks is because Sunak, and his predecessors, were pro EU they did not/do not want to upset the EU. The government could stop the boats entering UK territorial waters, it would be unpopular with lefties and the EU would go mental, but international law would be on the governments side. The problem is, to implement international law in the best interests of the UK we first need a government who is willing to put the UK first. The worrying thing is that you might actually believe that diatribe, and are not just spouting the GBNews and Daily Mail opinions that you’ve been fed. Leaving the EU was supposed to let the UK make its own decisions and reclaim its sovereignty. Gathering together a difficult to identify collection of groups that you say is now thwarting the majority of UK peoples wishes is ludicrous. When has Sunak ever advocated the UK’s membership of the EU…? |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 1, 2024 20:03:04 GMT
Brexit could have worked, it should have worked, but unfortunately it doesn't matter what the majority want or voted for. The left wing pro EU establishment including the civil service and 70% of MP's did not want Brexit and were determined to stop it or make it as difficult and tortuous a process as possible. The majority in this country have been fucked over, but you know this. I agree Rwanda was never going to work, it's a gimmick. And the reason the government have been forced to rely on gimmicks is because Sunak, and his predecessors, were pro EU they did not/do not want to upset the EU. The government could stop the boats entering UK territorial waters, it would be unpopular with lefties and the EU would go mental, but international law would be on the governments side. The problem is, to implement international law in the best interests of the UK we first need a government who is willing to put the UK first. The worrying thing is that you might actually believe that diatribe, and are not just spouting the GBNews and Daily Mail opinions that you’ve been fed. Leaving the EU was supposed to let the UK make its own decisions and reclaim its sovereignty. Gathering together a difficult to identify collection of groups that you say is now thwarting the majority of UK peoples wishes is ludicrous. When has Sunak ever advocated the UK’s membership of the EU…? Well how typical, you dismiss everything I said as 'diatribe' without providing a single scrap of evidence to the contrary. Once a lefty always a lefty I guess... |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Apr 1, 2024 20:14:19 GMT
It is estimated that if the crossings continue as they have so far this year, 50,000 Alleged Asylum Seekers will unlawfully enter England by the end of the year, the only thing that delays them getting here is bad weather
|
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Apr 1, 2024 20:16:24 GMT
Brexit could have worked, it should have worked, but unfortunately it doesn't matter what the majority want or voted for. The left wing pro EU establishment including the civil service and 70% of MP's did not want Brexit and were determined to stop it or make it as difficult and tortuous a process as possible. The majority in this country have been fucked over, but you know this. I agree Rwanda was never going to work, it's a gimmick. And the reason the government have been forced to rely on gimmicks is because Sunak, and his predecessors, were pro EU they did not/do not want to upset the EU. The government could stop the boats entering UK territorial waters, it would be unpopular with lefties and the EU would go mental, but international law would be on the governments side. The problem is, to implement international law in the best interests of the UK we first need a government who is willing to put the UK first. The worrying thing is that you might actually believe that diatribe, and are not just spouting the GBNews and Daily Mail opinions that you’ve been fed. Leaving the EU was supposed to let the UK make its own decisions and reclaim its sovereignty. Gathering together a difficult to identify collection of groups that you say is now thwarting the majority of UK peoples wishes is ludicrous. When has Sunak ever advocated the UK’s membership of the EU…? Leaving the EU was the start of the process of taking back control, we have almost removed the largely unelected/unaccountable control bureaucracy of the EU yet have now to deal with the directly elected largely unrepresentative bureaucracy that is our own political domain that has been infected with the professional politician and the serving time politicians on the way to grander climes. Once again we know what we voted for in 2019, the political class know what we voted for in 2019 and once again they largely ignore that and go their own undeclared way. Taking back control is to do with the electorate and their relationship with Westminster and vice versa, that process is underway and there will be tears and tantrums and hiccups along the way. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 1, 2024 20:16:53 GMT
It is estimated that if the crossings continue as they have so far this year, 50,000 Alleged Asylum Seekers will unlawfully enter England by the end of the year, the only thing that delays them getting here is bad weather You're watching GB News H, good man, you know it makes sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Apr 2, 2024 17:40:55 GMT
I wonder why they keep coming...
|
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Apr 3, 2024 20:06:06 GMT
Just been reported that at the moment the nationalities of three biggest groups of refugees crossing the channel from war torn France are: Vietnamese Chinese Turkish. So at best they are economic migrants, not as outraged lefties claim, refugees or asylum seekers. In fact, in reality they are criminals. But hey, lets not get reality confused with 1950's legislation. But you got your way and took the UK's borders back. So it's about time you learned to control them — especially as the UK has immigration checkpoints in Calais and Dunkirk where UK Border Force officers have the power to arrest and detain individuals in the immigration control zones...
Earth calling these alleged asylum seekers don't go anywhere near any Checkpoints or Border Control or Ferry Port at all, they pay International Organised Criminal Gangs for a seat on Rubber Boat, which are carried down to a deserted beach somewhere on the French Coast in the early hours of the morning and set sail for the UK , if they get to England they enter my country unlawfully |
|
