Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 29, 2024 22:36:57 GMT
What is it with fascists and their demands for censorship, where in their minds the media is only there to spread their propaganda? Even if GB News is a little bias, the BBC, ITV, Channel Four (cringe factory), the Guardian, the Independent, the Times and many more (inc. the snat ones) are also bias, where some of them are even forced funded by the public. In fact, it's only the BBC that I have opposed and this is because they threaten and intimidate people who try and avoid the shameless BBC tax, whilst the BBC is pumping out Woke propaganda and omitting essential details that don't play to their agenda.
GB News popularity is a direct result of media bias, but the lefty fascists don't see it like that. They just see something they disagree with which must be stamped out.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Feb 29, 2024 22:53:46 GMT
What is it with fascists and their demands for censorship, where in their minds the media is only there to spread their propaganda? Even if GB News is a little bias, the BBC, the Guardian, the Independent, the Times and many more (inc. the snat ones) are also bias, where some of them are even forced funded by the public. In fact, it's only the BBC that I have opposed and this is because they threaten and intimidate people who try and avoid the shameless BBC tax, whilst the BBC is pumping out Woke propaganda and omitting essential details to don't play to their agenda. GB News popularity is a direct result of media bias, but the lefty fascists don't see it like that. They just see something they disagree with which must be stamped out. Well yes, that's a pretty accurate summation. Perhaps people who rubbish GB News should ask themselves why GB News is so popular.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Feb 29, 2024 22:54:49 GMT
Do you really expect me to log this bullshit? It's about as easy to do as remember the positions of the raindrops on my front doorstep a week ago. I've cut it out now so it is fading from my memory fast. Not at all, but given the fact that you 'forensically check reports' I think it's reasonable to ask for just one example... I've mentioned many things. GB News often contradicts itself as well. One economist will say one thing and another will say the opposite. It basically has a set of policies and it gathers all the negative points on each and often by the looks of things from others who are equally stupid. I often spent my time correcting the mistakes in the comments but they were ignored or shouted down. It's very much the same as the Daily Mail and Talk TV. Sure I agree with some of the things they say and even campaign for, but they are all crooked. The sources I use come from people who are consistently reliable. One huge thing I disagree on is China is not a threat to the UK. China wants to do business with the UK so China makes money ans so do we. I can't see anything wrong with that approach. Their power comes from their economic proficiency. The sooner we learn that as a country the better. By being brilliant accountants you can make your country great, just as we did hundreds of years ago. We were cheap and highly productive. I think it took 3 years to build a line from Manchester to London with picks and shovels. Real men like. China follows that example. They actually respect our past achievements.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Feb 29, 2024 23:08:48 GMT
What is it with fascists and their demands for censorship, where in their minds the media is only there to spread their propaganda? Even if GB News is a little bias, the BBC, ITV, Channel Four (cringe factory), the Guardian, the Independent, the Times and many more (inc. the snat ones) are also bias, where some of them are even forced funded by the public. In fact, it's only the BBC that I have opposed and this is because they threaten and intimidate people who try and avoid the shameless BBC tax, whilst the BBC is pumping out Woke propaganda and omitting essential details that don't play to their agenda. GB News popularity is a direct result of media bias, but the lefty fascists don't see it like that. They just see something they disagree with which must be stamped out. They are all spreading propaganda. It is had to find a channel that you can rely on, but I find some of the independent bloggers excellent. It depends on the reason they started. Some start to be political and some aim to be educational. You can tell the good ones because they correct their own mistakes.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 29, 2024 23:09:33 GMT
What is it with fascists and their demands for censorship, where in their minds the media is only there to spread their propaganda? Even if GB News is a little bias, the BBC, the Guardian, the Independent, the Times and many more (inc. the snat ones) are also bias, where some of them are even forced funded by the public. In fact, it's only the BBC that I have opposed and this is because they threaten and intimidate people who try and avoid the shameless BBC tax, whilst the BBC is pumping out Woke propaganda and omitting essential details to don't play to their agenda. GB News popularity is a direct result of media bias, but the lefty fascists don't see it like that. They just see something they disagree with which must be stamped out. Well yes, that's a pretty accurate summation. Perhaps people who rubbish GB News should ask themselves why GB News is so popular. Popular = populist = bad. leftie handbook pp1.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Feb 29, 2024 23:14:21 GMT
Well yes, that's a pretty accurate summation. Perhaps people who rubbish GB News should ask themselves why GB News is so popular. Popular = populist = bad. leftie handbook pp1. Surely you know where the word commune comes from. (Latin com)
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Feb 29, 2024 23:19:38 GMT
Well yes, that's a pretty accurate summation. Perhaps people who rubbish GB News should ask themselves why GB News is so popular. Popular = populist = bad. leftie handbook pp1. Indeed, yet GB News popularity grows. Could it be that aggressive lefties are in fact, a tiny if vociferous minority.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Feb 29, 2024 23:20:39 GMT
Popular = populist = bad. leftie handbook pp1. Surely you know where the word commune comes from. (Latin com) Oh ffs stop it.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 29, 2024 23:24:02 GMT
Popular = populist = bad. leftie handbook pp1. Surely you know where the word commune comes from. (Latin com) I had a red bicycle too.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 29, 2024 23:48:17 GMT
Not sure why we need petitions to shut down sections of the media we disagree with - if you disagree with their output then don't watch it. The BBC are losing customers by the thousands as they refuse to pay for a tv license...
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Mar 1, 2024 0:08:25 GMT
Baron, if anyone makes errors about China, it's you. How do I put this mildly? It's a fucking dictatorship which has killed millions. Those deaths were from one faction in China going after another faction.
45 million people dead Baron. There are no excuses. And the party which was in government at the time, is the party which is in government now. The Communist Party of China, a dictatorship. Stop defending the murderous bastards.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Mar 1, 2024 1:25:39 GMT
Those deaths were from one faction in China going after another faction.
45 million people dead Baron. There are no excuses. And the party which was in government at the time, is the party which is in government now. The Communist Party of China, a dictatorship. Stop defending the murderous bastards. The vast majority died in the famine and 45 million is wrong. The truth, in case you ever like to know it, is the numbers who died in the famine were unknown. Of course there are estimates, but they range widely because there is no way of knowing. It was so tragic that no one went around counting people. They had survival to worry about. Also you do like to put it all down to a simple thing like calling it a dictatorship, but the reasons it happened were various. No one did it on purpose.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2024 11:13:35 GMT
What is it with fascists and their demands for censorship, where in their minds the media is only there to spread their propaganda? Even if GB News is a little bias, the BBC, ITV, Channel Four (cringe factory), the Guardian, the Independent, the Times and many more (inc. the snat ones) are also bias, where some of them are even forced funded by the public. In fact, it's only the BBC that I have opposed and this is because they threaten and intimidate people who try and avoid the shameless BBC tax, whilst the BBC is pumping out Woke propaganda and omitting essential details that don't play to their agenda. GB News popularity is a direct result of media bias, but the lefty fascists don't see it like that. They just see something they disagree with which must be stamped out. They are all spreading propaganda. It is had to find a channel that you can rely on, but I find some of the independent bloggers excellent. It depends on the reason they started. Some start to be political and some aim to be educational. You can tell the good ones because they correct their own mistakes. The Scottish Nationalists and the totalitarian Left are only insisting on banning GB News. The rest of the media establishment doesn't seem to bother them.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Mar 1, 2024 11:55:03 GMT
45 million people dead Baron. There are no excuses. And the party which was in government at the time, is the party which is in government now. The Communist Party of China, a dictatorship. Stop defending the murderous bastards. The vast majority died in the famine and 45 million is wrong. The truth, in case you ever like to know it, is the numbers who died in the famine were unknown. Of course there are estimates, but they range widely because there is no way of knowing. It was so tragic that no one went around counting people. They had survival to worry about. Also you do like to put it all down to a simple thing like calling it a dictatorship, but the reasons it happened were various. No one did it on purpose. Has it occurred to you, that you might be mistaken? And that your sources (the Communist Party of China) might be lying, to make their murderous history look better than it actually was? Enough of us remember Tiananmen Square mate. Don't try to fool us, it won't work.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Mar 1, 2024 12:43:35 GMT
The vast majority died in the famine and 45 million is wrong. The truth, in case you ever like to know it, is the numbers who died in the famine were unknown. Of course there are estimates, but they range widely because there is no way of knowing. It was so tragic that no one went around counting people. They had survival to worry about. Also you do like to put it all down to a simple thing like calling it a dictatorship, but the reasons it happened were various. No one did it on purpose. Has it occurred to you, that you might be mistaken? And that your sources (the Communist Party of China) might be lying, to make their murderous history look better than it actually was? Enough of us remember Tiananmen Square mate. Don't try to fool us, it won't work. You said 45 million. You will have to explain how you know how many died in the famine when no one else does.
|
|