Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2024 18:21:24 GMT
Labour will certainly stop illegals crossing the channel in dinghies. I mean, there wont be any need to pay people smugglers. Labour will send ferries for them. I've not heard that they would send ferries over, Red. Perhaps you have a link for that. I would really like to hear what their actually policy is on illegals crossing the channel. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 10, 2024 18:25:09 GMT
Labour will certainly stop illegals crossing the channel in dinghies. I mean, there wont be any need to pay people smugglers. Labour will send ferries for them. I've not heard that they would send ferries over, Red. Perhaps you have a link for that. I would really like to hear what their actually policy is on illegals crossing the channel. Ned, trust me on this one.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2024 18:29:48 GMT
Well Labour have already said that the numbers will probably be higher - they have no interest in reducing them anyway. Migration could increase in the “short term” under a Labour government, the party’s chairman has suggested.
The change could happen under Sir Keir Starmer’s plans to plug gaps in the workforce, Anneliese Dodds said.
However, she insisted that the party would not set a target for reducing the annual number of arrivals, saying that to do so was “not sensible”.
She repeatedly refused to say whether Labour would look to cut net migration in the longer term if it wins power at the next general election.Weird that, that is exactly what I said. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2024 18:30:27 GMT
Labour will certainly stop illegals crossing the channel in dinghies. I mean, there wont be any need to pay people smugglers. Labour will send ferries for them. Oh, I see another joke. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2024 18:31:27 GMT
Labour will certainly stop illegals crossing the channel in dinghies. I mean, there wont be any need to pay people smugglers. Labour will send ferries for them. I've not heard that they would send ferries over, Red. Perhaps you have a link for that. I would really like to hear what their actually policy is on illegals crossing the channel. Set up asylum claim facilities in France, they have been telling people this for months. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 10, 2024 18:45:37 GMT
I've not heard that they would send ferries over, Red. Perhaps you have a link for that. I would really like to hear what their actually policy is on illegals crossing the channel. Set up asylum claim facilities in France, they have been telling people this for months. That is not the policy - they want safe routes into the UK for asylum seekers, which will exponentially increase numbers. |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Mar 10, 2024 19:29:42 GMT
I suppose your thoughts on immigration depends on a couple of things; 1. Why are you in Broadmoor? 2. Is there any danger of you being released? OK I jest. But to say you don't mind immigrants suggests you are unaware of the realities of what is happening to this once great country. Borchester, I think you're older than me, so I guess you remember this country before the EU, before mass immigration, before we had foreign enclaves and prisons full of foreign prisoners. What prison full of forigners prisoners red ? These two There are two prisons which hold exclusively foreign prisoners awaiting deportation: HMP Maidstone in Kent and HMP Huntercombe near Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire
www.theguardian.com/society/2023/oct/16/moj-to-free-up-cells-by-deporting-more-foreign-prisoners-and-axing-short-terms
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 10, 2024 19:33:29 GMT
Labour will certainly stop illegals crossing the channel in dinghies. I mean, there wont be any need to pay people smugglers. Labour will send ferries for them. Oh, I see another joke. Redders! Oh bless, they let you out. Ref my previous, no it's not a joke, as you will see if Labour win the election. |
|
|
|
Post by Hutchyns on Mar 10, 2024 21:01:34 GMT
I agree, the ferries scheme is the only sensible option. The People smuggling trade is so lucrative and so profitable that more and more will set up business doing it. Massive profits from charging huge fees for a cramped place on a dodgy rubber boat ..... with safety features almost non-existent. But the money still accumulates hand over fist allowing you to buy even more boats and cater for even more 'passengers'.
So all the money goes to the People smugglers, and all the expenses land in the lap of the British Taxpayer who has to cover the hotel bills, the food, the dentistry, the weekly pocket money etc etc.
Why don't WE make a profit instead and charge £5000 a head for a seat on a ferry to come over if you're 35 year old Schoolboy with no documentation ? Warmer, more comfortable and far safer than a rubber dinghy. We'd be making amounts of money that would make a substantial dent in those hotel bills, rather than the Smugglers (or the French Government) pocketing it.
Let's be realistic, there's no chance that in the next decade or so our Woke Politicians will be getting us out of the ECHR, or that we'll ever send more than 15 people to Rwanda, or that the Lefty Lawyers won't continue to run rings around us. Why keep covering the expenses, but not joining in by taking a big share of the profits ? Let's ease the burden on the taxpayer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 10, 2024 21:06:43 GMT
I suspect the Labour government will make a deal with France to cut the illegal immigrants coming across the channel by 50% .
Then no matter how many come over in the dinghies Starmer will claim there would have been twice as many without the deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 11, 2024 2:01:32 GMT
I suspect the Labour government will make a deal with France to cut the illegal immigrants coming across the channel by 50% . Then no matter how many come over in the dinghies Starmer will claim there would have been twice as many without the deal. No, the deal Starmer makes will be with the EU not France, and it will be a deal that does not benefit the UK. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2024 11:54:20 GMT
Set up asylum claim facilities in France, they have been telling people this for months. That is not the policy - they want safe routes into the UK for asylum seekers, which will exponentially increase numbers. Not the full story, they want to be able to return failed asylum seekers to France. France have offered the UK the facilities to vet asylum seekers in France. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 11, 2024 12:19:57 GMT
That is not the policy - they want safe routes into the UK for asylum seekers, which will exponentially increase numbers. Not the full story, they want to be able to return failed asylum seekers to France. France have offered the UK the facilities to vet asylum seekers in France. ..and in return Labour will take in a share of France's asylum claims.. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 11, 2024 14:34:28 GMT
The Brexit boo hooers contradict themselves .
First they sneer that Brexit hasn’t decreased immigration and then they whine that there isn’t enough immigration .
I’m sure the new Labour administration will help them get a grip …not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Mar 11, 2024 14:39:48 GMT
And where are they going to live ? In houses & flats all over the country that will be secretly bought by the Home Office while British people languish for years on housing waiting lists. This is happening now, under a conservative government. Can you imagine what it's going to be like under a Starmer Labour government. Exactly the same I would guess. It's like all the bastards in Westminster are working for the same party. |
|
